The Banner (talk | contribs) →Advice: new section |
No edit summary |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
:You better do, otherwise you wel get many more blocks for breaking the rules. [[User:Night of the Big Wind|Night of the Big Wind]] ([[User talk:Night of the Big Wind|talk]]) 13:47, 29 May 2011 (UTC) |
:You better do, otherwise you wel get many more blocks for breaking the rules. [[User:Night of the Big Wind|Night of the Big Wind]] ([[User talk:Night of the Big Wind|talk]]) 13:47, 29 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
Look I already told you I am not reading the millions of rules so stop telling me I have to cause I won't. I am not wasting all of my time when I could be doing be productive things with my life. You still ignore the fact you broke one of the rules by insulting another user on Wikipedia, and your acting as of you didn't do anything wrong. |
Look I already told you I am not reading the millions of rules so stop telling me I have to cause I won't. I am not wasting all of my time when I could be doing be productive things with my life. You still ignore the fact you broke one of the rules by insulting another user on Wikipedia, and your acting as of you didn't do anything wrong. |
||
Looking at the template on my user page one of the rules says no personal attacks. So it's ok for you to break the rules of Wikipedia, and insult other users and not get in any trouble ? I don't get it. |
|||
:Maybe I became rude towards you. But please by aware that you started an editwar over some unsourced addition in an article where it did not belong, even with references. And just claimed that all the others were wrong and you were right. Unfortunately, that was not the case. So please, use the talkpage of an article the next time you don't agree with a revert of your edit. It saves a lot of trouble when you just ask why it is reverted. [[User:Night of the Big Wind|Night of the Big Wind]] ([[User talk:Night of the Big Wind|talk]]) 13:47, 29 May 2011 (UTC) <small>If you sign your edit on talkpages with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, the system will autoimagically reoplace this by your username, date and time.</small> |
|||
Please be aware that you called me an idiot which is in violation of Wikipedia's policy of civility. That's not fair for me to get blocked and you get away for what you did. |
|||
:Stop whining and start taking advice. [[User:Night of the Big Wind|Night of the Big Wind]] ([[User talk:Night of the Big Wind|talk]]) 17:52, 29 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Advice == |
|||
This seems to be a good advice for you: [[Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user]]. You can ''request'' a mentor to help you during the often difficult start at Wikipedia. [[User:Night of the Big Wind|Night of the Big Wind]] ([[User talk:Night of the Big Wind|talk]]) 17:55, 29 May 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:30, 30 May 2011
|
May 2011
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Columbidae. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Columbidae was changed by Icex15 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956147 on 2011-05-26T22:34:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:34, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 01:35, 27 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Columbidae. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 01:40, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Columbidae, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Columbidae was changed by Icex15 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969626 on 2011-05-28T21:03:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:03, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here Wow I didn't even do anything wrong. I was falsely accused of vandalizing Columbidae when I didn't. There was a rude user called Night of the Big Wind who was being harsh and was telling me to I had to edit Feral Pigeon. I didn't know there was a Feral Pigeon page, and I tried to explain to him that I am still new to editing Wikipedia, and he was acting like I have been editing for years. He also left an edit on my user page calling me an idiot by saying "please turn your F****ng brain on". I find that edit very inpolilite and disrespectful. He should be blocked as well or at least give him a warning notice. ;}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:54, 28 May 2011 (UTC)- Even so, You have the template with information on your talkpage. I had told you what you were doing wrong and where the information should go. And again you reverted the page. The link to the Feral pigeon is on the top of the article. May I suggest that the next time you add something and it is reverted by an experienced editor, that you ask that editor on his talkpage why he has reverted? That saves you a lot of trouble. Night of the Big Wind (talk) 23:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
That doesn't give you the right to insult people calling them stupid, and I don't have the time to look at all of the thousands of rules.
- You better do, otherwise you wel get many more blocks for breaking the rules. Night of the Big Wind (talk) 13:47, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Look I already told you I am not reading the millions of rules so stop telling me I have to cause I won't. I am not wasting all of my time when I could be doing be productive things with my life. You still ignore the fact you broke one of the rules by insulting another user on Wikipedia, and your acting as of you didn't do anything wrong.