Firefangledfeathers (talk | contribs) m Reverted 1 edit by Par âpre aux astres (talk) to last revision by ClueBot III |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{nobots}} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
{{trout me}} |
|||
| algo=old(90d) |
|||
{{User:Ivanvector/Protection notice}} |
|||
{{Ombox |
|||
| counter=1 |
|||
| type = speedy |
|||
| maxarchivesize=100K |
|||
| image = [[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|50px|link=|alt=]] |
|||
| archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}} |
|||
| text = {{large|'''SCAM WARNING!'''}} |
|||
| minthreadsleft=4 |
|||
If you have been contacted or solicited by anyone asking for payment to get a draft into article space, improve a draft, or restore a deleted article, such offers are <u>'''not legitimate'''</u> and you should contact '''''{{no spam|paid-en-wp|wikipedia.org}}''''' immediately. Please see [[WP:SCAM|this page]] for more information. |
|||
| minthreadstoarchive=1 |
|||
| style = border-width: 1px; |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{DailyBracketBot}} |
|||
{{trout me}} |
|||
<!-- User talk header added by subst'ing the {{Usertalksuper}} template, modifying with new instructions. --> |
<!-- User talk header added by subst'ing the {{Usertalksuper}} template, modifying with new instructions. --> |
||
{{tmbox |image=[[Image:Nuvola apps edu languages.svg|none|50px| ]] |text='''''Welcome to my talk page!'''''<br> |
{{tmbox |image=[[Image:Nuvola apps edu languages.svg|none|50px| ]] |text='''''Welcome to my talk page!'''''<br> |
||
Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
* Thanks for stopping by! |
* Thanks for stopping by! |
||
[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=edit§ion=new}} '''⇒ Start a new Talk topic.'''] |
[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=edit§ion=new}} '''⇒ Start a new Talk topic.'''] |
||
}} |
|||
}}<!-- from 'subst:Usertalksuper' --> |
|||
{{tmbox |image=[[File:Gnome-envelope.svg]] |text='''[[Special:EmailUser/{{PAGENAME}}|Click here to email me.]]''' Emails sent through this form are private, however I may share their content privately with other users for administrative purposes. Please do ''not'' use {{tl|ygm}} on this page: if you email me I will have already received an on-wiki notification.}} |
|||
{{busy|[[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] ([[User talk:Ivanvector#top|talk]])}} |
|||
{{archives|banner=yes}} |
|||
{{Archives |auto=yes |search=yes |title=[[Help:Archiving a talk page|Archives]] ([[{{#titleparts:{{TALKPAGENAME}}|1}}/Archive index|index]]) |bot=MiszaBot III |age=90 }} |
|||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis |
|||
| archiveprefix=User talk:Ivanvector/Archive |
|||
== Edits on Contractor Relationship Management and deletionism == |
|||
| age=504 |
|||
| header={{aan}} |
|||
Just trying to clarify on the deletion of the article on Contractor Relationship Management. I ask a favor, please send me text of the deleted article so I can re-think and find more sources(I do not have access). |
|||
| numberstart=13 |
|||
To directly access the deleted revisions of a page, type "Special:Undelete/<target>" in the search box, where "<target>" is the name of the desired page. |
|||
| maxarchsize=100000 |
|||
| minkeepthreads=5 |
|||
I need to better explain in the article that it is a software, whereas the concept of Contractor Management differs in scope. Thanks for your contributions to wikipedia, greatly appreciate it and look forward to learning the ways as I read up more. |
|||
| format= %%i |
|||
[[User:Zutralife|Zutralife]] ([[User talk:Zutralife|talk]]) 22:28, 23 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
| archivebox=no |
|||
}} |
|||
<small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Zutralife|Zutralife]] ([[User talk:Zutralife|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zutralife|contribs]]) 22:27, 23 July 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Hi {{ul|Zutralife}}! Thanks for your contribution. I'm not an administrator, I don't have the authority to delete pages. What I did was edit the page to create a [[WP:REDIRECT|redirect]] because I think the article you created doesn't quite meet the [[WP:GNG|general notability guideline]]. Every page edit is kept in the page's ''history'' which you can see from the "View history" tab at the top of the page. Your article's history is [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Contractor_Relationship_Management&action=history here]. You can even undo my edit if you want, but I think you should try to find more sources first. Also, when you write on talk pages please remember to sign your post by typing <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> after your comment. Cheers! [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] ([[User talk:Ivanvector#top|talk]]) 22:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Please comment on [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#rfc_A757E9B|Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)]] == |
|||
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the [[Wikipedia:Request for comment|request for comment]] on '''[[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#rfc_A757E9B|Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)]]'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding|suggestions for responding]]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from [[Wikipedia:Feedback request service]]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 12524 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 00:06, 5 August 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Pointless message == |
|||
(cur | prev) 13:47, 8 August 2014 Ivanvector (talk | contribs) . . (223,043 bytes) '''(+753)''' . . (→Yes, all list entries must be cited: reply) (undo | ) |
|||
(cur | prev) 13:46, 8 August 2014 The Mol Man (talk | contribs) . . (222,290 bytes) '''(+752)''' . . (undo) |
|||
You just had to one up me, eh? |
|||
<small>Sorry for the pointless message, it's morning, and I'm not in the best state of mind. When I saw those numbers I just ''had'' to bring it up.</small> [[User:The Mol Man|mol]][[User talk:The Mol Man|uɐɯ]] 13:53, 8 August 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:Ha! Wasn't intended ;) I didn't overwrite your edit, did I? [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] ([[User talk:Ivanvector#top|talk]]) 14:15, 8 August 2014 (UTC) |
|||
::Nope. You just happened to have exactly 1 more byte. [[User:The Mol Man|mol]][[User talk:The Mol Man|uɐɯ]] 14:16, 8 August 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Please comment on [[Talk:Donald Trump#rfc_A9F5B2B|Talk:Donald Trump]] == |
|||
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the [[Wikipedia:Request for comment|request for comment]] on '''[[Talk:Donald Trump#rfc_A9F5B2B|Talk:Donald Trump]]'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding|suggestions for responding]]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from [[Wikipedia:Feedback request service]]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 13124 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 00:01, 21 August 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Please comment on [[Talk:European Conservatives and Reformists#rfc_CDE0AAE|Talk:European Conservatives and Reformists]] == |
|||
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the [[Wikipedia:Request for comment|request for comment]] on '''[[Talk:European Conservatives and Reformists#rfc_CDE0AAE|Talk:European Conservatives and Reformists]]'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding|suggestions for responding]]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from [[Wikipedia:Feedback request service]]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 13774 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 00:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Please comment on [[Talk:Ed Miliband#rfc_751B99A|Talk:Ed Miliband]] == |
|||
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the [[Wikipedia:Request for comment|request for comment]] on '''[[Talk:Ed Miliband#rfc_751B99A|Talk:Ed Miliband]]'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding|suggestions for responding]]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from [[Wikipedia:Feedback request service]]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 14514 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 00:05, 21 September 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== everycandidate.org == |
|||
Hey there Ivanvector, you're doing some great work on the Toronto municipal election 2014 page. A project I'm working on is collecting and releasing related data that you might be interested in: http://everycandidate.org All of the data is accessible from the "Open Data" page. Cheers, Phillip. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/64.231.8.111|64.231.8.111]] ([[User talk:64.231.8.111|talk]]) 01:39, 30 September 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Thanks for the link! Unfortunately it looks to me like your site would be unsuitable to use here as a [[WP:RS|reliable source]], because it appears to be a [[WP:SPS|self-published]] website which builds content based on user submissions, and we can't verify the expertise or reliability of such contributions. It looks like a fine site but I don't think it can be used here. [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] ([[User talk:Ivanvector#top|talk]]) 16:45, 30 September 2014 (UTC) |
|||
==[[Alpine Mountain Schnauzer]]== |
|||
I was going to ask for a speedy deletion "Article appears to be a hoax. No [[WP:RS]]. No assertion of [[WP:Notability]]}}" and you beat me to it. Good job! <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 19:46, 1 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:I couldn't find a good [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion criteria]] to flag it under, but it felt like an awful lot of [[WP:NOTBURO|bureaucratic nonsense]] to have to go through AfD for it. But [[WP:CHEAP|redirects are cheap]]. Incidentally I was going to ask, since you added it to the list at [[Mountain dog]], if you knew in fact that the breed was real and I just couldn't find it. But then I figured you were probably just cleaning up. [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] ([[User talk:Ivanvector#top|talk]]) 19:49, 1 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
::You were very quick. The addition of the breed was a [[SNAFU]] or oversight. |
|||
::I am, however, rather proud of the [[Mountain dog]] list which I created. It is a formulation that appeared in lots of dog literature, without putting it together in one place. The phrase has been loosely used for years. I happen to know something about them, as I've owned a [[Bernese Mountain Dog]], a Landseer [[Newfoundland]], and two [[Leonberger]]s. |
|||
::A list sometimes is a useful device. I have a couple of other lists I did. [[List of magic museums]] and [[Trial film]]s (as a lawyer I knew something about this), both of which I thought brought together some useful stuff in one place. These were things that were not easily found elsewhere on the internet. By and large, its hard to put together a list in wikipedia and not have it get deleted. Thanks for your help. <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 20:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:::FYI: |
|||
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Alpine Mountain Schnauzer]]== |
|||
[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]] |
|||
A tag has been placed on [[:Alpine Mountain Schnauzer]], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason: |
|||
<center>''Article appears to be a hoax. No WP:RS. No assertion of WP:Notability Not a recognized breed by anyone.''</center> |
|||
Under the [[WP:CSD#General criteria|criteria for speedy deletion]], articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. |
|||
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:Alpine Mountain Schnauzer|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request [[WP:RFUD|here]]. <!-- Template:Db-reason-notice --> <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 22:07, 1 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== A [[Dobos torte]] for you! == |
|||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Dobos cake (Gerbeaud Confectionery Budapest Hungary).jpg|120px]] |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> has given you a [[Dobos Torte]] to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. |
|||
== Just FYI == |
|||
After being blocked for a month both back at it again https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_page_protection%2FIncrease&diff=1228216139&oldid=1228212906 <span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">[[User:Moxy|Moxy]]</span>🍁 01:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
To give a Dobos Torte and spread the [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]], just place {{tls|Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
|||
|} <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 22:15, 1 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== EFFPR revdel == |
|||
== Please comment on [[Talk:Joni Ernst#rfc_4E6FEB8|Talk:Joni Ernst]] == |
|||
Could you revdel all your edits up to, and including, my edit at rev. 1228510570? The "filter log" and "user filter log" buttons open up the filter log for the page name that was put in, where you can still see the page title. [[User:Rusty4321|<span style="background-color:#272;color:#ff0">'''Rusty4321'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Rusty4321|talk]] [[Special:Contribs/Rusty4321|contribs]]</sup> 16:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to [[Talk:Joni Ernst#rfc_4E6FEB8|participate in the request for comment]] on '''Talk:Joni Ernst'''. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see [[WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding]]. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at [[WP:Feedback request service]]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 15265 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 00:06, 7 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:{{yo|Rusty4321}} {{done}}, thanks for catching that. [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] (<sup>[[User talk:Ivanvector|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ivanvector|Edits]]</sub>) 16:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Bracket Errors on 7 October == |
|||
== Threads == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=628707480 your edit] to [[November 8]] may have broken the [[syntax]] by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:November 8|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].</span> |
|||
:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: |
|||
*<nowiki>[[1991]] &ndash; [[Riker Lynch]], American singer and bass player for the band [[R5 (band)|R5]]</nowiki>{{red|''')'''}}<nowiki></nowiki> |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow [[User:BracketBot#Opting out|these opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, <!-- (-1, 0, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 21:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
I see this is getting out of hand. |
|||
== Reviewing == |
|||
I devotes are fine to impose their preferred version. I also see if is fine for users to simply propose noting and just be in opposition to something and claim it is the only gig in town. I have restarted the discussion as a clean break. I’d like to point out I made two clear proposals which were engaged with by two other users. The four claiming to have done notes in consensus have not engaged and have just been oppose, with actual reasoning. I am just frustrated and feel like I am being pushed around and having ck structure discussions an attempting diverted off I. To obfuscation comments which feel like just oppose what ever is do. I am just really POed I’m proofing stuff that a courr ed of users are ranging with if but others are just trying to steamroller and ignore anything I propose. What’s the point if a discussion if no proposals and ready are to be given other than oppose everything and actual proposals and reasons are to just be ignored. I am just departed as all o want is engagement with pfoposskk k scans actual props ok x not done word keys discussion about what s ‘default’ is or weather the bot is deprecated. |
|||
If the proposals I was making were engage with I would be wanting to scream WTF. I just want an actual discussion on the issues with numbers. Not this impose what I feel like and attack the only person making proposals. |
|||
Hi there. I saw that as a reviewer you approved [[Special:Diff/629047427|this edit]]. FYI, the article has actually been protected, through pending changes, to specifically avoid this type of unsourced additions of BLP information such as birthdays. The reviewer right is supposed to be used to uphold Wikipedia's policies such as [[WP:VERIFICATION]]. In this case, this unsourced edit should have been rejected. Thank you for your consideration. [[User:Dr.K.|Δρ.Κ.]] <small><sup style="position:relative">[[User talk:Dr.K.|λόγος]]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.5ex;*left:-5.5ex">[[Special:Contributions/Dr.K.|πράξις]]</span></sup></small> 20:48, 10 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:Hi {{ul|Dr.K.}}! Thanks for your note. I appreciate your advice, however as I noted in my review summary (which I don't know how to link to), the information that was added in that edit was properly sourced through the linked articles, which conforms with [[WP:BLP]] and [[WP:V]] in my experience. Thus, the information was verifiable (I verified it, the source is [http://world.kbs.co.kr/english/program/program_artist_detail.htm?No=106531 here]), the edit was not a violation of the policy and was not vandalism, so there was no reason to reject it. I see that you have reverted the edit; I am not going to undo your revert but please consider attempting to verify the information rather than just deleting it next time. Thanks again for your message. [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] ([[User talk:Ivanvector#top|talk]]) 04:53, 11 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Please lend a girl a hand and engage with actual proposals and not he part of the no no no brigade. [[User:PicturePerfect666|PicturePerfect666]] ([[User talk:PicturePerfect666|talk]]) 18:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::K-pop is a very abused area in terms of adding unverified information relating to birthdays and positions. Most of the time there are no supporting sources or if there are they are in Korean and are not easy to find using English search terms. It is also not practical and time-consuming to verify the information by going to multiple member sub-articles individually to verify the information shown in the central group article. This problem is further exacerbated given the large number of K-pop groups most of which have many members. The [[WP:BURDEN|burden]] lies with the editor who adds the information to provide sources which will comply with verification, not with the editor who removes it. If an editor does not provide the source required for WP:V s/he should be made aware about the use of sources or about providing an edit-summary when adding the unsourced information. Unfortunately I have no access to your review summary either. Had I seen it I could have added the source myself. Alternatively you could have helped out as well, but I don't want to put you under pressure. [[User:Dr.K.|Δρ.Κ.]] <small><sup style="position:relative">[[User talk:Dr.K.|λόγος]]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.5ex;*left:-5.5ex">[[Special:Contributions/Dr.K.|πράξις]]</span></sup></small> 10:48, 11 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:{{yo|PicturePerfect666}} I feel like we've had this discussion before, but you seem to not be accepting good-faith criticism. I am trying to engage with your new discussion in good faith, and I disagree with your position on archiving but I am not out to get you, I just want to find common ground to get through the dispute. Wikipedia is a collaborative project with ''millions'' of editors in every country on Earth, and you ''will'' from time to time encounter people who don't agree with you. The way we resolve those disagreements is through discussion, and the nature of this process is that sometimes we don't get our way, or have to compromise to move forward. And sometimes, even if you are ''sure'' that you are right, you need to be able to recognize that you're [[WP:DEADHORSE|beating a dead horse]] and that it's okay to walk away. If you don't then yeah, you'll get frustrated and you'll start to see everyone as being out to get you, if you don't do something that gets you blocked or just walk away from Wikipedia entirely. I've been there, it sucks. You might like the essay [[WP:DGAF|don't give a fuck]], which isn't meant to be taken seriously but I like it as a reminder not to get too personally invested in anything here, it's just a website after all. [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] (<sup>[[User talk:Ivanvector|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ivanvector|Edits]]</sub>) 19:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::I understand what you're saying - K-pop is indeed a popular target for information being added by eager fans and inexperienced editors with no effort to provide sourcing, and those edits are clear BLP violations and are required to be reverted. When I come across such an edit, I revert it with a note to the policy, and in most cases I notify the editor (though for IPs with little edit history I usually don't bother). The edit we're talking about was not such an edit. I verified the information in two clicks. It was not a BLP violation and should not have been reverted. Per [[WP:MINREF]], there is a very limited scope of information which is ''required'' to be sourced where it appears, and in my experience a living person's birthday does not fall within that scope unless it is disputed. Of course it is ideal to provide a source, but providing an inline citation for every single bit of information in an article (even a BLP) is [[WP:CITEKILL|citation overkill]] and just makes articles unreadable. There was no requirement to provide an inline source in this case, in my opinion, thus the policy was upheld, and the edit was approved. [[WP:PC]] is for preventing edits which are ''clear violations'', not for preventing edits which are ''imperfect''. Also, the pending changes log does not seem to have an entry for this article. [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] ([[User talk:Ivanvector#top|talk]]) 13:23, 11 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:PP666, there are actually really good reasons to include the most recent discussions -- even if they're ''years'' old, sometimes -- at an article talk. It lets people easily see what's been discussed most recently at that article talk. It lets people easily see who has been involved in those discussions. I very recently came into a talk page with a concern, and saw that the same concern had been discussed three years earlier, so I knew who to ping. [[User:Valereee|Valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 20:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::Per WP:V, "All content must be verifiable." There are no exemptions, BLP or not. Also per WP:V: "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be replaced without an inline citation to a reliable source". There are very good reasons for removing unsourced material, especially in K-pop articles. If unsourced information were to be allowed to enter such articles it would cause endless edit-wars between fans to keep changing the birthdays and positions, as it has been happening for a long time. Even fans cannot agree on birthdays and positions and they keep changing them. Only by following WP:V we can bring some sense of order to this edit-warring madness. Most of the time I become aware of an edit in a K-pop article when a fan has changed a birthday or position. And this happens often. And it happens to sourced information, as well as unsourced. Only when the changed birthday or position is referenced I know that the edit is unconstructive. If they are not cited, noone knows and therefore an edit to information which is unsourced invites more edit-warring by someone who does not agree with it in the future. This becomes an endless cycle of reverting. It is much safer and better therefore for unsourced birthday and position information to remain out of the K-pop articles because, if unsourced, it keeps being edit-warred upon by fans. There is also no issue with citation overkill when one deals with individual information such as individual birthdays of the members of a group. [[User:Dr.K.|Δρ.Κ.]] <small><sup style="position:relative">[[User talk:Dr.K.|λόγος]]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.5ex;*left:-5.5ex">[[Special:Contributions/Dr.K.|πράξις]]</span></sup></small> 18:26, 11 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Information regarding sockpuppets == |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for October 19== |
|||
<S>Over the past few days, I have noticed a concerning trend in the South Asian military history articles on Wikipedia. A significant number of articles that are of relatively low importance are being rapidly created and then promptly deleted. What is particularly noteworthy is the speed at which these articles are appearing and disappearing. The root cause that I have identified behind this issue is the persistent "vandalism" of existing articles by certain users. I have compiled a list of names that should be closely monitored and considered for inclusion on a list of frequent vandals.How can I go for the block of the vandals or what steps should I follow to apply for their block? |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Rob Ramage]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Alain Cote]]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
(1)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rawn3012]<br>(2)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mohammad_Umar_Ali]- A confirmed sockpuppet of User-[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rawn3012]'''''Check confirmation points below'''''<br>(3)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Based_Kashmiri]<br>(4)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PadFoot2008]<br>(5)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ratnahastin] |
|||
'''Proofs''':- |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:01, 19 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
(1)'''Rawn3012 being sockpuppet of Mohammad Umar Ali:-''' |
|||
:[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|18px|link=|alt=]] '''Fixed'''. Thanks. [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] ([[User talk:Ivanvector#top|talk]]) 19:23, 19 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mohammad_Umar_Ali] |
|||
1)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kingdom_of_Mewar_-_Delhi_Sultanate_Conflict_(1326_to_1518)] |
|||
2)[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mewar%E2%80%93Delhi_Sultanate_Wars&diff=prev&oldid=1211572133] |
|||
3)[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Khanwa&diff=prev&oldid=1228434276] |
|||
4)[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mewar-Malwa_conflict&diff=prev&oldid=1211728927] |
|||
5)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Maratha%E2%80%93Nizam_wars] |
|||
'''(2)Supporting Based Kashmiri(sock/meatpuppet) :''' |
|||
1)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Siege_of_Orchha_(1635)] |
|||
2)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Based_Kashmiri] |
|||
3)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Maratha_invasion_of_Awadh] |
|||
'''(3)User Editing articles together with BHUPENDRA JOGI:-''' |
|||
1)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mewar-Malwa_conflict] |
|||
2)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Bhutala]-----> edited by bhupendra jogi and Mohammad Umar Ali |
|||
3)[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mewar-Malwa_conflict&action=history] |
|||
'''(4)BHUPENDRA JOGI edited Mewar Malwa conflicts:-''' |
|||
1)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mewar-Malwa_conflict] |
|||
2)Warned for his distruptive edits-(especially on Rajput pages, Similiar to Rawn3012:-[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:BHUPENDRA_JOGI] |
|||
'''(5)Editing Articles in a vandalising manner:-'''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mewar-Malwa_conflict&action=history] |
|||
Same article Created By User Mohammed Umar Ali |
|||
'''(2)Engaged in Edit Warring:''' |
|||
1)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Battle_of_Mandalgarh_and_Banas] |
|||
'''(6)Rawn3012 Supporting Ratnahastin and Based Kashmiri:''' |
|||
1)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Maratha%E2%80%93Nizam_wars] |
|||
'''(7)Links of Ratnahastin and Padfoot2008''': |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Early_Mughal%E2%80%93Sikh_wars] |
|||
'''(8)Involvement of user padfoot2008''':- |
|||
->Continuously editing the some articles in the similiar way the user based kashmiri did and supporting Rawn3012,Based.Kashmiri and Mohammad Umar Ali.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?offset=20240612125139&target=PadFoot2008&title=Special:Contributions/PadFoot2008] |
|||
->Destroying some articles and supporting another articles without [[WP:NPOV]] !!! |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Capture_of_Hooly_Honore&diff=prev&oldid=1228471816] |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mughal_conquest_of_Baglana&diff=prev&oldid=1228472313] |
|||
[[User:Roberthooke003|Roberthooke003]] ([[User talk:Roberthooke003|talk]]) 04:14, 22 June 2024 (UTC)</s> [[WP:SOCKSTRIKE|Blocked sock]]. <span style="font-family:'forte'">[[User:Ratnahastin|<span style="color:#A52A2A;">Ratnahastin</span>]] <b>([[User talk:Ratnahastin|talk]])</b></span> 05:52, 24 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:The above user is probably a sockpuppet, see this [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/AdityaNakul#Suspected_sockpuppets_7], Thanks. <span style="font-family:'forte'">[[User:Ratnahastin|<span style="color:#A52A2A;">Ratnahastin</span>]] <b>([[User talk:Ratnahastin|talk]])</b></span> 07:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Rajiv Dixit]] == |
|||
== Please comment on [[Talk:2014 military intervention against ISIS#rfc_7923B83|Talk:2014 military intervention against ISIS]] == |
|||
My talkpage ping may not have worked so dropping you this note about [[Talk:Rajiv_Dixit#Activist_vs_conspiracy_theorist|a discussion]] I started on the article talkpage that parallels your [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rajiv_Dixit&diff=prev&oldid=1218251074 previous edit summary advise]. No immediate admin action is needed but some extra eyes would be good. Cheers. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare|talk]]) 19:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to [[Talk:2014 military intervention against ISIS#rfc_7923B83|participate in the request for comment]] on '''Talk:2014 military intervention against ISIS'''. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see [[WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding]]. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at [[WP:Feedback request service]]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 15926 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 00:07, 22 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:Thanks for your note; you're right, your ping didn't work. I'm busy for the next few days but will try to have a look. [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] (<sup>[[User talk:Ivanvector|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ivanvector|Edits]]</sub>) 20:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:28, 26 June 2024
Archives: Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Just FYI
After being blocked for a month both back at it again https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_page_protection%2FIncrease&diff=1228216139&oldid=1228212906 Moxy🍁 01:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
EFFPR revdel
Could you revdel all your edits up to, and including, my edit at rev. 1228510570? The "filter log" and "user filter log" buttons open up the filter log for the page name that was put in, where you can still see the page title. Rusty4321 talk contribs 16:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Rusty4321:
Done, thanks for catching that. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Threads
I see this is getting out of hand. I devotes are fine to impose their preferred version. I also see if is fine for users to simply propose noting and just be in opposition to something and claim it is the only gig in town. I have restarted the discussion as a clean break. I’d like to point out I made two clear proposals which were engaged with by two other users. The four claiming to have done notes in consensus have not engaged and have just been oppose, with actual reasoning. I am just frustrated and feel like I am being pushed around and having ck structure discussions an attempting diverted off I. To obfuscation comments which feel like just oppose what ever is do. I am just really POed I’m proofing stuff that a courr ed of users are ranging with if but others are just trying to steamroller and ignore anything I propose. What’s the point if a discussion if no proposals and ready are to be given other than oppose everything and actual proposals and reasons are to just be ignored. I am just departed as all o want is engagement with pfoposskk k scans actual props ok x not done word keys discussion about what s ‘default’ is or weather the bot is deprecated.
If the proposals I was making were engage with I would be wanting to scream WTF. I just want an actual discussion on the issues with numbers. Not this impose what I feel like and attack the only person making proposals.
Please lend a girl a hand and engage with actual proposals and not he part of the no no no brigade. PicturePerfect666 (talk) 18:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- @PicturePerfect666: I feel like we've had this discussion before, but you seem to not be accepting good-faith criticism. I am trying to engage with your new discussion in good faith, and I disagree with your position on archiving but I am not out to get you, I just want to find common ground to get through the dispute. Wikipedia is a collaborative project with millions of editors in every country on Earth, and you will from time to time encounter people who don't agree with you. The way we resolve those disagreements is through discussion, and the nature of this process is that sometimes we don't get our way, or have to compromise to move forward. And sometimes, even if you are sure that you are right, you need to be able to recognize that you're beating a dead horse and that it's okay to walk away. If you don't then yeah, you'll get frustrated and you'll start to see everyone as being out to get you, if you don't do something that gets you blocked or just walk away from Wikipedia entirely. I've been there, it sucks. You might like the essay don't give a fuck, which isn't meant to be taken seriously but I like it as a reminder not to get too personally invested in anything here, it's just a website after all. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- PP666, there are actually really good reasons to include the most recent discussions -- even if they're years old, sometimes -- at an article talk. It lets people easily see what's been discussed most recently at that article talk. It lets people easily see who has been involved in those discussions. I very recently came into a talk page with a concern, and saw that the same concern had been discussed three years earlier, so I knew who to ping. Valereee (talk) 20:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Information regarding sockpuppets
Over the past few days, I have noticed a concerning trend in the South Asian military history articles on Wikipedia. A significant number of articles that are of relatively low importance are being rapidly created and then promptly deleted. What is particularly noteworthy is the speed at which these articles are appearing and disappearing. The root cause that I have identified behind this issue is the persistent "vandalism" of existing articles by certain users. I have compiled a list of names that should be closely monitored and considered for inclusion on a list of frequent vandals.How can I go for the block of the vandals or what steps should I follow to apply for their block?
(1)[1]
(2)[2]- A confirmed sockpuppet of User-[3]Check confirmation points below
(3)[4]
(4)[5]
(5)[6]
Proofs:-
(1)Rawn3012 being sockpuppet of Mohammad Umar Ali:-
[7]
1)[8]
2)[9]
3)[10]
4)[11]
5)[12]
(2)Supporting Based Kashmiri(sock/meatpuppet) :
1)[13]
2)[14]
3)[15]
(3)User Editing articles together with BHUPENDRA JOGI:-
1)[16]
2)[17]-----> edited by bhupendra jogi and Mohammad Umar Ali
3)[18]
(4)BHUPENDRA JOGI edited Mewar Malwa conflicts:-
1)[19]
2)Warned for his distruptive edits-(especially on Rajput pages, Similiar to Rawn3012:-[20]
(5)Editing Articles in a vandalising manner:-[21]
Same article Created By User Mohammed Umar Ali
(2)Engaged in Edit Warring:
1)[22]
(6)Rawn3012 Supporting Ratnahastin and Based Kashmiri:
1)[23]
(7)Links of Ratnahastin and Padfoot2008:
[24]
(8)Involvement of user padfoot2008:-
->Continuously editing the some articles in the similiar way the user based kashmiri did and supporting Rawn3012,Based.Kashmiri and Mohammad Umar Ali.[25]
->Destroying some articles and supporting another articles without WP:NPOV !!!
[26]
[27]
Roberthooke003 (talk) 04:14, 22 June 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock. Ratnahastin (talk) 05:52, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above user is probably a sockpuppet, see this [28], Thanks. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
My talkpage ping may not have worked so dropping you this note about a discussion I started on the article talkpage that parallels your previous edit summary advise. No immediate admin action is needed but some extra eyes would be good. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 19:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note; you're right, your ping didn't work. I'm busy for the next few days but will try to have a look. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC)