El Machete Guerrero (talk | contribs) →74.248.71.191: new section |
Jéské Couriano (talk | contribs) →74.248.71.191: Proof? |
||
Line 233: | Line 233: | ||
Did you not read my summary? The IP is a sockpuppet who is currently blocked. He is playing you and the system. [[User:El Machete Guerrero|El Machete Guerrero]] ([[User talk:El Machete Guerrero|talk]]) 07:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC) |
Did you not read my summary? The IP is a sockpuppet who is currently blocked. He is playing you and the system. [[User:El Machete Guerrero|El Machete Guerrero]] ([[User talk:El Machete Guerrero|talk]]) 07:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Proof? -<font color="32CD32">''[[User:Jéské Couriano|Jeremy]]''</font> <font color="4682B4"><sup>([[User talk:Jéské Couriano|v^_^v]] [[Wikipedia:Trading card game|Cardmaker]])</sup></font> 07:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:27, 17 March 2009
no archives yet (create) |
- NOTE: If you leave a message for me here, I will respond to it here.
- NOTE: If you need to ask me a question regarding certain users, be aware that I will look into the history.
- NOTE: I reserve the right to remove any posts by anons unrelated to building an encyclopedia. Personal attacks, vandalism, Internet memes, etc. will be reverted on sight.
Page protection - Thank you
I just wanted to say thank you for adding the protection to my userpage, I much prefer it to be in it's current semi-protected state. Thank you again! ZX81 talk 21:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Better it's semi'd than you get harassed. -Jéské Couriano (v^_^v) 21:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- I completely agree with you. The Wiki protection page said a user page could be protected after it had been vandalised (which it has a few times now), but I wasn't sure how much vandalism was needed before I could request protection so I'm glad you did it before I got round to asking! ZX81 talk 21:25, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Here's a hint: If your userpage starts being redirected, request protection immediately - that usually means that JarlaxleArtemis has posted an edit URL on 4chan and thus that there'll be 80 more coming your way. -Jéské Couriano (v^_^v) 21:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- I completely agree with you. The Wiki protection page said a user page could be protected after it had been vandalised (which it has a few times now), but I wasn't sure how much vandalism was needed before I could request protection so I'm glad you did it before I got round to asking! ZX81 talk 21:25, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
How to find discussion on blocking?
Hi, I saw [this] block log and wanted to know how to find the discussion that led to the block. I did global searches for "Priyesh.786" and "User:Priyesh.786" in all namespaces and wasn't able to find anything. Thanks, Bongomatic 23:32, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- The user was constantly posting material copyrighted by two Indian universities and was repeatedly recreating the articles that I and other administrators had deleted as copyvios; he came back as User:Mamboitaliana100 and continued, stopping only when I explained to him that we couldn't accept his submissions after he asked me to unprot one of the pages he tended to recreate. See User talk:Jéské Couriano/Archive 6#unprotect page "Kurukshetra University". -Jéské Couriano (v^_^v) 23:37, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I know who it is (I did many of the speedy nominations and identified the sources). I just wanted to know whether there were discussions to block the user, or if such determinations can be unilateral and undocumented. Tx Bongomatic 13:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- For blatant and unrepentant copyright violations, the rule is block on sight, sooner rather than later on the off-chance the violator happens to be PT. -Jéské Couriano (v^_^v) 13:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I know who it is (I did many of the speedy nominations and identified the sources). I just wanted to know whether there were discussions to block the user, or if such determinations can be unilateral and undocumented. Tx Bongomatic 13:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Your Opinion
Hi,
I wanted to know you opinion on starting a MFD on castrated ram's userpage. I am concerned it is a shrine. From other Wikis where they have also vandalised links to page including Uncyclopedia and Wikibooks along with numerous others. There's even a definition at urban dictionary about them. If the page stays do you think it may inspire copycats? Regards--DFS454 (talk) 13:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Please provide a link to the userpage - I'm not familiar with that user, and he doesn't seem to exist. Also, the Urban Dictionary entry is for the literal sense (i.e. a castrated male sheep). -Jéské Couriano (v^_^v) 13:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry if I was being ambiguous I thought I saw you using the Moniker for them DFS454 (talk) 14:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- The "wethers" don't have userpages other than IP pages. And in any case, I'm not the person you should be asking given that I have an axe to grind against Jarl. Find someone more neutral. -Jéské Couriano (v^_^v) 14:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry if I was being ambiguous I thought I saw you using the Moniker for them DFS454 (talk) 14:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Drizzt Do'Urden
Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article Drizzt Do'Urden, I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the review page, and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) BOZ (talk) 20:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Sockpuppets
Well, that was fun, eh? What glorious lives we admins lead. Kafziel Complaint Department 05:57, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- I caught it after I read the AIV report that had gotten his right to make new accounts revoked; I was just boggled at the number of attack accounts made because someone forgot to check a box and the fact the blocking admin missed the sockfarm. -Jéské Couriano (v^_^v) 05:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- What's weird is, the "prevent account creation" box is checked by default. So Bongwarrior had to un-check it. I have no idea why. Kafziel Complaint Department 06:01, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- It was a username softblock. SOP for those is to uncheck that box, so I can understand why he did it, but given the name, I would have hardblocked the name. -Jéské Couriano (v^_^v) 06:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for those blocks but when blocking grawp accounts please block with email and talkpage blocked as well or else he abuses those as well --Chris 06:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Had I known beyond a doubt they were Jarl socks I'd've done so, Chris. -Jéské Couriano (v^_^v) 06:32, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for those blocks but when blocking grawp accounts please block with email and talkpage blocked as well or else he abuses those as well --Chris 06:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- It was a username softblock. SOP for those is to uncheck that box, so I can understand why he did it, but given the name, I would have hardblocked the name. -Jéské Couriano (v^_^v) 06:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- What's weird is, the "prevent account creation" box is checked by default. So Bongwarrior had to un-check it. I have no idea why. Kafziel Complaint Department 06:01, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Someone needs a dab of joy! ^_^
You might wanna take a wikibreak when you start doing things like this... So I'ma give you a Smile! :-D
- 'Bout the only joy I'm getting nowadays is getting rid of Jarl socks and Ubering Heavies, Yama. Nevertheless, I appreciate the thought. -Jéské Couriano (v^_^v) 21:13, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
User talk:Curps
Please reconsider your move to unprotect this page. After you approved this request, Barrier, mate went on a move spree and then nominated a page for deletion in a bad faith manner; likely his account was hijacked by a page-move vandal. He has since been indefinitely blocked and I'm not sure if unprotection is prudent based on the requestor. Nate • (chatter) 07:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- I've reversed it; thank you for the info. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 08:27, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- I've also tweaked the block to negate possible email access; there's a good chance this is an ED Joe job against Grawp or a genuinely compromised account (or both), and in either case should not have access to the emailuser function. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 08:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick action on this. Nate • (chatter) 09:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Null persp; I apologize for not being faster. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 09:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick action on this. Nate • (chatter) 09:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- I've also tweaked the block to negate possible email access; there's a good chance this is an ED Joe job against Grawp or a genuinely compromised account (or both), and in either case should not have access to the emailuser function. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 08:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Protection
Sorry - just have to do it. This is just nuts ... - Alison ❤ 09:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- Undone. I'm headed that way in ~ 14 minutes; I'll prot it myself then. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 09:17, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ufff - it's wrecking my watchlist (and head) :/ - Alison ❤ 09:19, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm camping the page right now. I don't need a prot until I need to go to bed. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 09:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ufff - it's wrecking my watchlist (and head) :/ - Alison ❤ 09:19, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Request
Hey Jeske, would you be able to restore User:Grsz11/Review archive. Thanks in advance. Grsz11 02:38, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- All 23 edits? (I just want to ask before I restore all of them) -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 02:40, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sure, I just need to copy some stuff and then i'll db it again. Grsz11 02:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Done When you're done, ping me and I'll kill it again. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 02:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sure, I just need to copy some stuff and then i'll db it again. Grsz11 02:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Protection
Not a problem. Happens to me all the time. :) seresin ( ¡? ) 04:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Should we call that a 'cock block'?
Or should I be embarrassed for that and ashamed of myself? HalfShadow 04:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Get our mind outta the gutter ;P I've fixed it already and blocked the right account; I'd gotten distracted before I hit "block". -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 04:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Apologies accepted. Thanks for the prompt response! Brianyoumans (talk) 04:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. I'm going to go put the block notice on the correct page now... (rakes self) -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 04:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Apologies accepted. Thanks for the prompt response! Brianyoumans (talk) 04:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Don't do this again
Unacceptable. If you must block an account in violation of AGF, use a less offensive summary. Consider this a warning. Cool Hand Luke 19:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Notice that that section is c&p'd from the section above verbatim. I've already been scolded and blasted for it. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 19:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- I saw, but it didn't seem to sink in then. Cool Hand Luke 20:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- For the record, CHL, I've just hidden the block comment so that admins/oversighters only can see it ... in deference to the editor. Per oversight-l email, I'm doing it here as policy is currently somewhat gray re. revision visibility and I feel bad for the blocked editor. Commenting here for visibility and accountability - Alison ❤ 20:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- I saw, but it didn't seem to sink in then. Cool Hand Luke 20:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
On wikibreak
Hey all. Jéské is currently on two weeks' wikibreak, so if you've admin stuff, feel free to ask me or another admin for assistance. He deserves the rest - Alison ❤ 05:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
I assume you missed the fact, that the talk page you deleted was actually Talk:Austria–Hungary moved by a vandal. --Pjacobi (talk) 10:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- I had thought I'd gotten the correct page. My apologies (I notice it's been fixed since; I was on break when you posted the above). -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 08:20, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
I am somewhat annoyed that you decided to delete this article under an incorrect criterion, after I had declined it just minutes before and tagged for prod. I request you revise this mistake. Regards SoWhy 08:10, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- I had not noticed your decline when I speedied it. I see no assertations of notability in that article; I will not object if you reinstate and reprod, be aware. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 08:11, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- You should really check the page history before deleting things...and, I know you are an admin and longer than I am, but please read A7. It does only allow deletion for real persons, organisations and web content. Not logical concepts, even if they derive from a webcomic. Regards SoWhy 08:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- I just came back from a Wikibreak, SoWhy; my apologies for the rust. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 08:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Article fully restored, along with PROD. As I'm not aware which edits are from the current incarnation and which edits are not, I restored all of them. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 08:18, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks and no problem, no harm done. That's why I came here after all, instead of just undoing your actions. Have a nice day
SoWhy 08:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Good timing; it's 0:20 over here :P -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 08:20, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks and no problem, no harm done. That's why I came here after all, instead of just undoing your actions. Have a nice day
- Article fully restored, along with PROD. As I'm not aware which edits are from the current incarnation and which edits are not, I restored all of them. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 08:18, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- I just came back from a Wikibreak, SoWhy; my apologies for the rust. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 08:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- You should really check the page history before deleting things...and, I know you are an admin and longer than I am, but please read A7. It does only allow deletion for real persons, organisations and web content. Not logical concepts, even if they derive from a webcomic. Regards SoWhy 08:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
South Pasadena Middle School now
You protected the high school article - now the kiddies have moved on to South Pasadena Middle School. Thanks! :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 03:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- Done. Tell me when they move on to the elementary school. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 03:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- As a side note I've indef'd the main account behind it. He still denies it, but his contributions are very damning. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 03:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
The Legend of Spyro page protection
As well as Spyro (series) The Legend of Spyro: A New Beginning The Legend of Spyro: The Eternal Night and The Legend of Spyro: Dawn of the Dragon.
Thank you for the full protection on all above articles. However no progress has been made. The opposing party left one reply to my original message and hasn't bothered to continue talking about this. Thus I went to the Requests for Protection and requested for an unprotection and was told to contact you about it.
So could you please protect the coresponding pages and watch them incase the opposing party tries to make the edits he refused to discuss. Thank you.
- I'll unprotect all of them. I fixed your link above, hopefully you did not mind. If he shows up again, don't edit-war with him if you can avoid it. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 23:25, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing the link, stuff like that happens to me more often then i'd like it to. If he tries to make the controvertial edits then i'll contact you. Thanks for being a good Admin. We need more like you.Wise dude321 (talk) 23:34, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- You can feel free to revert him, just don't edit-war while doing it. He's technically being disruptive by refusing consensus. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 00:37, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing the link, stuff like that happens to me more often then i'd like it to. If he tries to make the controvertial edits then i'll contact you. Thanks for being a good Admin. We need more like you.Wise dude321 (talk) 23:34, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Convert
Why d'ya convert 'mon and 'pets? I like them. --98.162.148.46 (talk) 01:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Because it's a challenge. Those two really don't have much on them, even if you look. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 02:38, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
anesthesia
I believe mmackinnon and I are at an impasse. He is particularly interested in including an AANA talking point that happens to be misleading; I am particularly interested in leaving that out. Since he doesn't want a neutral position (but insists on the misleading talking point), mere facts aren't going to convince him. I'd like to ask you to change the section to leave out "CRNAs do not require Anesthesiologist supervision in any state and only require surgeon/dentist/podiatrists to sign the chart for medicare billing in all but 16 states."
I'd obviously prefer my version, but would settle for something like "the precise scope of nurse anesthetist practice varies state by state".
Separately, Finavon and Depstein have contributions that ought to enter the page; these are not politically controversial. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Riffington (talk • contribs) 19:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Absolutely not. I cannot edit on behalf of any party on a page I myself protected. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 21:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Well, what is the next step? Surely it must be something other than "wait until August and then fix things"...Riffington (talk) 00:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Ask for unprotection if discussion is not happening. But do not make editprotected requests to request disputed edits. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 00:47, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Oh, it was mmackinnon who requested the editprotect, not me. I am not really sure how the moderation system works.Riffington (talk) 03:13, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Here's how it goes. When someone requests a full-protection due to a dispute on an article, the article will remain locked down until all parties establish a consensus, or until one of the major sides starts refusing to discuss. While it is protected, people may use {{editprotected}} on the article's talk page to request edits be made to the article, but these edits cannot be to, or directly tied with, the subject matter in dispute or else the administrator servicing the request will reject it. The admin who protected the article is not permitted to involve himself in the dispute. If you think protection's served its purpose or is failing, you can request an unprotection at WP:Requests for page protection and an admin will see to it, probably after requesting you take it up with me first. Note that if discussion related to the dispute is still taking place on the talk page of an article, I will be disinclined to unprotect it. -Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 20:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
User Name
I'm not changing my username. Why do you want me to change it?--JoeCool950 (talk) 18:04, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'm saying rename your *old* username. The one you had before you were JoeCool950. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 20:24, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- That one doesn't exist, I've always had JoeCool950.--JoeCool950 (talk) 01:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'd doublecheck if I were you, in particular check "What links here" and look for redirects to your user page. One of the accounts with a userpage redirect to yours was blocked as a Grawp sock. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 11:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- You'll have to tell me what username your talking about, because my username as I recall was not blocked as a Grawp sock. Tell me though what a Grawp sock is, so I can let you know.--JoeCool950 (talk) 03:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Grawp. And the username is the one you were renamed from, according to the logs: Joey Kaminski (talk · contribs). -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 05:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I've already had Joey Kaminski (talk · contribs) changed back to my original one JoeCool950 (talk · contribs). Joey Kaminski (talk · contribs) shouldn't exist. If it's not against the rules, I could move it myself, but if so, I'll request for the page to be deleted.--JoeCool950 (talk) 05:27, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Did someone try to use that name Joey Kaminski (talk · contribs)? That's what it looks like. Thanks for deleting it. I figured that was the best way.--JoeCool950 (talk) 05:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Someone did. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 05:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Did someone try to use that name Joey Kaminski (talk · contribs)? That's what it looks like. Thanks for deleting it. I figured that was the best way.--JoeCool950 (talk) 05:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- You can't move a page with edits onto another one with edits. I'll kill it for you if you wish. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 05:34, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I've put a request for a deletion. If I ever do decide to use that name again, then I can, not that I want to now, but just asking?--JoeCool950 (talk) 05:36, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Not until you have it renamed first; at present it's blocked indefinitely, no email, no talk page as a sockpuppet of JarlaxleArtemis/Grawp. You will also have to talk to stewards at Meta or thru IRC (#wikimedia-stewards) to dissolve the resultant unified account. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 05:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I've deleted the user page and the user talk page redirect. I wish you luck. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 05:42, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- That's why then there was a block on the Joey Kaminski (talk · contribs), since someone tried to use it. Hopefully, you guys were able to figure out who it was. I think then, it was a safe thing to have it deleted. Would you mind watching my current one JoeCool950 (talk · contribs) and if someone else tries to use it, let me know, just like with Joey Kaminski (talk · contribs). Thanks.--JoeCool950 (talk) 05:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Not until you have it renamed first; at present it's blocked indefinitely, no email, no talk page as a sockpuppet of JarlaxleArtemis/Grawp. You will also have to talk to stewards at Meta or thru IRC (#wikimedia-stewards) to dissolve the resultant unified account. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 05:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- You'll have to tell me what username your talking about, because my username as I recall was not blocked as a Grawp sock. Tell me though what a Grawp sock is, so I can let you know.--JoeCool950 (talk) 03:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'd doublecheck if I were you, in particular check "What links here" and look for redirects to your user page. One of the accounts with a userpage redirect to yours was blocked as a Grawp sock. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 11:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- That one doesn't exist, I've always had JoeCool950.--JoeCool950 (talk) 01:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- (RI) So long as you keep using JoeCool950, there's no risk of someone taking it. However, I'll ask on IRC for the namewatcher botop to add the string "JoeCool". -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 06:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Since it redirected to JoeCool950 (talk · contribs), don't know if it would be a safe thing or not?JoeCool950 (talk) 06:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- You still have JoeCool950. The name-watcher bot only triggers when someone creates a new user account with that specific string. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 06:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I did send the guy who blocked the username and thanked him for catching that. I'm wondering should Joey Kaminski (talk · contribs) stayed blocked, or since they know it wasn't me, if they'll unblock it.--JoeCool950 (talk) 06:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- You still have JoeCool950. The name-watcher bot only triggers when someone creates a new user account with that specific string. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 06:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Since it redirected to JoeCool950 (talk · contribs), don't know if it would be a safe thing or not?JoeCool950 (talk) 06:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Question
What do you mean I would have to talk to stewards at Meta or thru IRC (#wikimedia-stewards) to dissolve the resultant unified account of Joey Kaminski (talk · contribs)? I'm not even on wikimedia? Is that how it got caught? By the way, sorry for all the questions, just trying to figure out how it got hacked into in the first place.--JoeCool950 (talk) 06:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- It got caught because it started doing Hagger pagemoves, and it wasn't hacked. When a user is renamed, the old username becomes unregistered (which is why it's recommended to reregister the old account as an anti-impersonation measure). When I say contact stewards on meta, I mean at Meta-Wiki, the hub for all the Wikimedia Foundation wikis, or thru IRC (using a program such as chatzilla) - they are the only ones with the power to nullify existing unified accounts, but they can only do so if all instances of that name is gone first, so you may be asked to work with them so that they can remove the unified account as soon as the local (English Wikipedia) account is renamed. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 07:08, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Must you have an account with Wikimedia to contact them? I don't have an account with Wikimedia. I tried to contact them last night, but it shows I don't have an account on Wikimedia. The only account I've got is the Wikipedia account?--JoeCool950 (talk) 02:52, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- An alternative is to unify your Wikipedia account. Once you have JoeCool950 unified, you'll also have a Meta account, though you may have to log out and then log back in to sign into it. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 03:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- I just put the wikipedia website with my user name. The one that was hacked into, so they can see what they can do and left them my talk page. Was that o.k. to do? I don't think it's worth having two accounts, so once they fix the other one, what should we do with that one. I didn't even know that I still had the Joey Kaminski account. I thought once they switched it back to JoeCool950, that the user name Joey Kaminski no longer existed? Let me know what I need to do for the future, if I change JoeCool950? Thanks.--JoeCool950 (talk) 03:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- If that wasn't o.k. just let me know and I'll unify the JoeCool950 account to get into wikimedia to get the user name Joey Kaminski fixed, or see what they can do. Once it's fixed, is it safe to use that account again, since someone got into there?--JoeCool950 (talk) 03:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- The Joey Kaminski account was unclaimed. Upon being renamed, the account becomes unregistered, so anyone may take it. The only account you've had since the rename was JoeCool950. My $.02 is leave the page deleted - he's not gonna be able to use it since standard operating procedure vs. Grawp is to lock him out of the emailuser function and his own talk pages (else he goatses them). Unify JoeCool950, ask the stewards for help and cooperate with them, and reregister Joey Kaminski when they gave you the all clear and give it a random password. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 03:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm going to have them take the unify account off of Joey Kaminski, or do what ever needs to be done, but I think I will though once they fix it, keep it deleted. If I keep it deleted though, is it even worth asking a steward to take care of that stuff?--JoeCool950 (talk) 04:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Is there away to take off the blocking on the account Joey Kaminski, since we had it deleted, or should we keep that account blocked. Not really understanding. A steward replied and told me the account was already blocked, so just wondering if the blocking can be taken off the account Joey Kaminski, since we deleted it? I did contact a stewart and replied back that I wanted the unify account removed on the Joey Kaminski account... We'll see what they say. I'll keep checking periodically and let you know what they say.--JoeCool950 (talk) 04:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Since it involves a renaming of the Joey Kaminski account, the block will move with the name. Ask if the SUL can be removed from the Joey Kaminski account so that you can reregister the account as an anti-impersonation measure (since it is a past username). If it helps, post a request at WP:CHU to help speed the process. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 04:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Is there away to take off the blocking on the account Joey Kaminski, since we had it deleted, or should we keep that account blocked. Not really understanding. A steward replied and told me the account was already blocked, so just wondering if the blocking can be taken off the account Joey Kaminski, since we deleted it? I did contact a stewart and replied back that I wanted the unify account removed on the Joey Kaminski account... We'll see what they say. I'll keep checking periodically and let you know what they say.--JoeCool950 (talk) 04:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm going to have them take the unify account off of Joey Kaminski, or do what ever needs to be done, but I think I will though once they fix it, keep it deleted. If I keep it deleted though, is it even worth asking a steward to take care of that stuff?--JoeCool950 (talk) 04:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- The Joey Kaminski account was unclaimed. Upon being renamed, the account becomes unregistered, so anyone may take it. The only account you've had since the rename was JoeCool950. My $.02 is leave the page deleted - he's not gonna be able to use it since standard operating procedure vs. Grawp is to lock him out of the emailuser function and his own talk pages (else he goatses them). Unify JoeCool950, ask the stewards for help and cooperate with them, and reregister Joey Kaminski when they gave you the all clear and give it a random password. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 03:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- If that wasn't o.k. just let me know and I'll unify the JoeCool950 account to get into wikimedia to get the user name Joey Kaminski fixed, or see what they can do. Once it's fixed, is it safe to use that account again, since someone got into there?--JoeCool950 (talk) 03:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- I just put the wikipedia website with my user name. The one that was hacked into, so they can see what they can do and left them my talk page. Was that o.k. to do? I don't think it's worth having two accounts, so once they fix the other one, what should we do with that one. I didn't even know that I still had the Joey Kaminski account. I thought once they switched it back to JoeCool950, that the user name Joey Kaminski no longer existed? Let me know what I need to do for the future, if I change JoeCool950? Thanks.--JoeCool950 (talk) 03:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- An alternative is to unify your Wikipedia account. Once you have JoeCool950 unified, you'll also have a Meta account, though you may have to log out and then log back in to sign into it. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 03:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Must you have an account with Wikimedia to contact them? I don't have an account with Wikimedia. I tried to contact them last night, but it shows I don't have an account on Wikimedia. The only account I've got is the Wikipedia account?--JoeCool950 (talk) 02:52, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
The Joey Kaminski Username
I told them to remove the SUL from the Joey Kaminski account and just told them that it will show that the account is blocked, but asked for them to remove that. After that's done, should I reregister the account as an anit-impersonation measure, since I'm not going to use it. If so, what type of username should I type in there, or request it as, or just put anti-impersonation measure on there?--JoeCool950 (talk) 04:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Once the account is renamed and the SUL gone, register the Joey Kaminski account and slap a random password in here. I did the same thing when Grawp somehow managed to circumvent the anti-spoofing measures and got my old name ("Jeske Couriano", without the diacritics), so I know what I'm talking about. Once that is done, feel free to toy with the userspace (even redirecting it to JoeCool950 as it was before, if need be). -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 05:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
RE:CHU reuest
Okay, thanks, I'll Change the sig mczack26 speaktome 16:27, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- As an aside, why are people complaining about your sig starting in lowercase? There are several people here who have similar sigs (many of which are admins); why is yours being singled out? -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 21:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I did an editor review and it was mentioned that my username didn't meet Wiki Specifications. Mczack26 speaktome 15:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Your username, lowercase or no, does pass WP:U, so trust me when I say they're full of blarney. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 21:23, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- I did an editor review and it was mentioned that my username didn't meet Wiki Specifications. Mczack26 speaktome 15:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi
OK i understand what you are saying i just did not want it added because i was just following what it said on the talk page that don't add thing without reliable resources i was not trying to go against any of Wiki's rules. Kyle1278 (talk) 02:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- I saw you discussion on the Talk:List of Pokémon (241–260) i guess no one is perfect i was not trying to prevent the person from adding it i was as i said before just following the rules that where put on the talk page and sorry if it felt like it was an attack in any way it was not meant like that at all. Kyle1278 (talk) 03:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't intend it to be mean. You made a similar mistake I did when I fought against adding SIHULM to the Pokémon list article. Everyone makes mistakes every now and again, chummer, don't sweat it. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 03:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Name Change in
The stewards said that would be fine and told me what you said to request it under WP:CHU. Since I'm using the JoeCool950 name, I'll let you guys decide what to change the name to and then you guys can take the block off of it, use it for someone new signing into Wikipedia, if that makes since to you. If you want, you can even handle the changing the Joey Kaminski user name to some account user name for someone new which is what should be done with that username. If someone decides to use Joey Kaminski after me then, it will be on them and not me. Just wanted to clue you in and that's why I lef NEW (NEW) on the request page. Thanks.--JoeCool950 (talk) 05:53, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Would you be able to handle taking off the blocking off of that once the user name Joey Kaminski is changed to a user account name. Thanks.--JoeCool950 (talk) 06:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- The block will be on the new name, not Joey Kaminski (the block log moves with the name now). -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 06:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- That will work. Once I see the that it has been changed, I'll have the stewards nullify the SUL, or should I leave it up to the person that hacked into it. That's what one steward said about the current Joey Kaminski account that were requesting to change. This another steward said (:Hello JoeCool950, I have locked that account since its only contributions are vandalic, which user is impersonated by it? If the user who is impersonated wants that name he will have to ask for renames on en.wiki (should be uncontroversial, vandal edits there) and on pl.wiki (0 edits there). Afterwards he can come here and ask for the deletion of this global name so he can register it new, to coordinate this better he may visit ##wikimedia-stewards connect. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 05:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC) ) Hopefully that makes since. The template channel part if your just reading probably doesn't but he's saying there for whoever the impersonator was to visit wikimedia-stewards themselves. Just wanted to know once the Joey Kaminski account that's blocked is changed, should I still request myself for the stewards to nullify the SUL, or have someone new do that? That's what I'm asking?--JoeCool950 (talk) 06:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. Once you notice it's been renamed, contact the stewards *immediately*. I'll help back you up. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 06:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- That will work. Once I see the that it has been changed, I'll have the stewards nullify the SUL, or should I leave it up to the person that hacked into it. That's what one steward said about the current Joey Kaminski account that were requesting to change. This another steward said (:Hello JoeCool950, I have locked that account since its only contributions are vandalic, which user is impersonated by it? If the user who is impersonated wants that name he will have to ask for renames on en.wiki (should be uncontroversial, vandal edits there) and on pl.wiki (0 edits there). Afterwards he can come here and ask for the deletion of this global name so he can register it new, to coordinate this better he may visit ##wikimedia-stewards connect. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 05:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC) ) Hopefully that makes since. The template channel part if your just reading probably doesn't but he's saying there for whoever the impersonator was to visit wikimedia-stewards themselves. Just wanted to know once the Joey Kaminski account that's blocked is changed, should I still request myself for the stewards to nullify the SUL, or have someone new do that? That's what I'm asking?--JoeCool950 (talk) 06:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- The block will be on the new name, not Joey Kaminski (the block log moves with the name now). -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 06:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Huh?
I saw a comment of your's. It is signed Jeremy but your name is Jeske. Why the difference. Why not just sign your name Jeske to avoid confusion? FK20 (talk) 01:21, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- It's signed Jeremy because /b/ won't stop forcing it on me. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 01:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, although ...
...I had already replied at his talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ah. My bad. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 03:23, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you...
...for your welcome. No worries about the rollback - it took me a while to figure out what was going on over there, but looks like somewhere in the midst of it someone didn't revert back far enough and the vandal actually reverted themselves...or something. Use once then dispose of safely (talk) 23:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- The vandal did revert himself after Sinebot signed his initial post there. I'm already emailing Oversight over the edits to permanently remove them from view. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 23:58, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Ooops!
Hey Jeske
That was not my intention and i apologize. I did not know any other way to contact you to refute the arguments made. Sorry again.Mmackinnon (talk) 21:24, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- In the future, if I remove something from my talk page, please do not reinstate it. The same follows for any other user (and you have the same right). -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 21:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Yah I actually thought i must not have saved it or something. My fault there.Mmackinnon (talk) 21:27, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Page protection
Thank you, doing a good job. Former D&D DM myself ;) 74.248.71.136 (talk) 07:23, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. I'm on my way to rebuke El Machete for altering your RFPP request. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 07:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
74.248.71.191
Did you not read my summary? The IP is a sockpuppet who is currently blocked. He is playing you and the system. El Machete Guerrero (talk) 07:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- Proof? -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 07:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)