Welcome!
Welcome!
Hello, Keith Okamoto, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! GlassCobra 02:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
July 2009
What is your source that Kingston and McCool will still have their titles? Or that they will defend them in singles matches? Do not add in matches that have not been announced yet. TJ Spyke 20:13, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page I Survived a Japanese Game Show (season 2) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Pakaran 04:30, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page I Survived a Japanese Game Show (season 2). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Pakaran 04:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article WWE Raw, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TJ Spyke 15:49, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
February 2010
STOP adding the WWE employees template to a TV show. That template is for EMPLOYEE pages. Under your bizarre logic, The Simpsons would contain the templates Template:EmmyAward ComedySupportingActress 1976-2000, Template:EmmyAward VoiceOver 1990-2000, Template:Simpsons cast, and Template:Spinal Tap (among others) just because members of the show have those. TJ Spyke 21:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Nevermind, I don't really care enough to keep arguing over it. TJ Spyke 21:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Talk:America's Best Dance Crew (season 5). Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.
If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. 5 albert square (talk) 01:14, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
WWE: NXT
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Do not removed the sourced information again or you will be reported for WP:3R. Thank you. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 00:12, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter, the information was stated on WWE television which is a reliable source. There is no source to support that ALL of the rookies will go to Raw or Smackdown. It's that simple. Source vs. No Source. Source wins. If Michael Cole misspoke doesn't matter. Until the show airs tonight and they announce otherwise, the information is sourced and, thus, stays in the article. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 00:19, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
WWE NXT
You are vandalising this page by removing a Reliable source. 81.141.102.84 (talk) 21:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Your source is not a reliable source.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 22:47, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- WP:PW/MOS well if you'd bother to check the Manual of Style you'd see WrestleView is under "Websites proven reliable", Wrestling News World falls under the sites such as LordsofPain and WrestleZone. 81.141.102.84 (talk) 08:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- If you'd like we can resolve this issue by asking a more experience editor as to which source is more reliable. 81.141.102.84 (talk) 08:44, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WWE NXT. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. TJ Spyke 23:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Total Drama Island has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Hamtechperson 02:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
America's Best Dance Crew (Season 5)
I just got your message. I'm still kind of new to Wikipedia.
Problem already fixed. I don't know why someone would post fake results on the episode progress chart this early in the season. The page might need semi-protection (the problem is...it might not technically be vandalism, so there's nothing we can really do about it unless it happens on multiple occasions). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolf of Ice (talk • contribs) 00:01, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Why do you keep reverting my removal of the stub template for Frank the Entertainer in a Basement Affair? Per the Wikiproject TV Assessment Guide, as well as per WP:Stub, it is obviously not a stub anymore, so the template should be removed. Also, I had asked for discussion, not a generic revert. Wikipedia is a grounds for communications over changes. Please discuss your reasoning for reverting my work. Thanks. Jrh7925 (talk) 04:50, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Frank the Entertainer in a Basement Affair. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:09, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
2010 WWE Draft
Well I've only redirected the page, so it hasn't been deleted. All of the edit history (including your edit) is still there right now and will still be there when the article is restored once we get some more info on the draft. Hope this helps. -- Θakster 21:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- No problemo. -- Θakster 21:56, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
March 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. –Turian (talk) 04:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. –Turian (talk) 22:22, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
WWE Championship
WWE.com lists the belt both on the Raw and Smackdown pages.
They list it on the Raw page because it's considered Raw property, and on the SD page due to a SD guy holding it.
Batista beat up Bret Hart and in return Vince McMahon gave him a title shot at his time of choosing.
Batista is a SD guy who is on Raw because of his deal with Vince and quite frankly hasn't been on SD since winning the belt. Batista is pretty much a SD guy now in name only.
But to the point at hand, as long as WWE.com lists the WWE Title on the Raw page, it's considered Raw property.
Thank You.
Vjmlhds 18:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
WWE.com made it a point to put it on the Raw page to show that the belt itself is considered Raw's property.
Besides, how can it be considered SD "Exclusive" when John Cena (Raw) will be fighting Batista for it at WrestleMania?
Bottom line--the belt is a Raw belt held by a SD wrestler due to a business deal.
Vjmlhds 19:09, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
I know it's on the SD page.
My point is that it's also listed on the Raw page, which means that they still consider the belt to be Raw's property--just so happens an SD guy is holding it.
Thus the WWE Championship is considered to still be Raw's World Championship.
Vjmlhds 19:16, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
It's neither Raw or SD exclusive technically.
WWE considers it Raw's belt, thus they list it on the Raw page, but they have to respect the fact that an SD guy is holding it, thus it's listed on the SD page as well.
But taking into account Batista has spent all his time on Raw since winning the belt, and WWE still lists it as a Raw title, it can't be considered SD "Exclusive".
Vjmlhds 19:24, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
WWE long ago made it a point that the tag team belts belong to both brands and the champions can bounce back and forth.
And you must not be watching Raw, because they made it quite clear that Batista was basically given carte blanche by Vince to have free reign and go and do whatever he wants to do because he beat up Bret Hart.
Like I said WWE is making a point of listing the WWE Title on the Raw page to make clear it's Raw's belt, while also respecting the fact that an SD guy holds it.
Vjmlhds 19:37, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
So you're just going to ignore the fact that WWE.com lists it as a Raw title?
It's Raw's title held by a SD guy due to a business deal. Both brands have claim to the belt as per WWE.com.
But you can't just shut Raw out of the mix.
Vjmlhds 19:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Reverted
I am having a hard time assuming good faith when taking in consideration you reverting an edit of mine on the WWE Roster page. I removed some information because the references did not meet the criteria of reliable sources. I do not understand why you reverted my constructive edit and not even explained why.
However, I have a duty as a Wikipedia editor to help you:
• Help:Edit summary will explain what the edit summary section during an edit is there for and why you should always explain the edits you are making.
• WP:VERIFY might help you understand why the source (SESCOOPS) listed in the WWE Roster article is not a reliable source.
• WP:STATUSQUO will explain why reverting constructive edits is only a "last resort" action.
I point this out on your talk page so we can avoid an edit war as neither of us want to suffer a [[WP:3RR}3RR violation]]. You have been on Wikipedia since 2007 and therefore you should already be oriented with the rules around here.
Thank you for your time,
Raaggio 03:21, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Be More Mindful When Editing
I looked through your contributions and was shocked to see that all you seem to do is revert other people's info. I find this to be a problem, especially since you never use an edit summary. Please be more constructive, diligent, and mindful of others when you edit and revert. Thanks. –Turian (talk) 01:14, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, the info was correct, but the source the user used was in another languange. I was only removing it until someone had the source in english. I know I've been on here since 2007, but I've never been on here fully until now. Sorry for all the trouble I've made.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 01:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- It seems you read what I said, but you didn't apply it since you were blocked. Please provide an edit summary when reverting otherwise we don't know why you reverted the edit. Also, if there is a problem, take it to the talk page. If you don't, I can only assume that you will be blocked for an even longer period of time. –Turian (talk) 20:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Dumbfounded
I am extremely dumbfounded to find you reverted my edit where it was perfectly fine. 81.141.102.111 (talk) 18:15, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Once again, the coding is perfectly acceptable there's no reason for reverting the edit. 81.141.102.111 (talk) 18:29, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- There's no reason for you to be removing an update to the Championship. 81.141.102.111 (talk) 18:58, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Keith Okamoto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was just trying to get english info on Alex Riley and The Usos being the new FCW Heavyweight and FCW Tag Team titles.
Decline reason:
I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Kuru (talk) 19:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
My I offer a helpful hint
Hi I Know you are blocked right now but when you return. When you go to revert something that looks to be a good edit before you go to revert it check to see if it has a good source and if it doesn't try to find a source that can be used to back up the new info if none can be found then revert it. You have any question's by all means stop by my talk page and ask I will be happy to try and answer and questions that you have.--Steam Iron 19:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Once again
Once again I find you reverting perfectly good edits [1] [2], they were sourced and I don't see why you would feel the need to remove this information. 81.141.102.111 (talk) 23:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Someone will eventually get to it, just because there is an inconsistency doesn't mean it's incorrect, Wikipedia even acknowledges its inconsistency in some of the policies and guidelines. 81.141.102.111 (talk) 00:45, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Please Use edit summary
Could you please use edit summary's it makes it really hard to understand as to why you went and did some thing to an article--Steam Iron 05:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC) When you edit a page right above the save page button is the edit summary space to type in a summary as to what you changed on the page ie. removed vandalism or just added some thing to the page that you thing should be there. If you have any more questions fell free to ask me on my talk page i would be happy to answer them.--Steam Iron 06:06, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
FCW
Check the list at WP:PW/MOS. The reliable sources are there as are the sources to avoid. !! Justa Punk !! 09:06, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. –Turian (talk) 02:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)