59.89.95.15 (talk) Undid revision 635068662 by 59.89.95.15 (talk) |
59.89.95.15 (talk) |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
== ''[[Chandramukhi]]'' == |
== ''[[Chandramukhi]]'' == |
||
Hey bro, you interested in conducting a GA review on Rajinikanth's comeback film {{Smiley}} [[User:Ssven2|Ssven2]] ([[User talk:Ssven2|talk]]) 08:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC) |
Hey bro, you interested in conducting a GA review on Rajinikanth's comeback film {{Smiley}} [[User:Ssven2|Ssven2]] ([[User talk:Ssven2|talk]]) 08:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC) |
||
:I'm afraid I have to pass. Maybe something else later! :) --[[User:Krimuk90|<span style="font-family: Courier;color:#00703C"> '''KRIMUK'''</span>''<span style="font-family: Courier;color:#CC5500">'''90'''</span>'']] [[User talk: |
:I'm afraid I have to pass. Maybe something else later! :) --[[User:Krimuk90|<span style="font-family: Courier;color:#00703C"> '''KRIMUK'''</span>''<span style="font-family: Courier;color:#CC5500">'''90'''</span>'']] [[User talk:Katrina Mukti D'souza Kapoor|<span style="color:#1B1B1B">'''✉'''</span>]] 03:52, 4 November 2014 (UTC) |
||
== ''[[Rani Mukerji]]'' == |
== ''[[Rani Mukerji]]'' == |
Revision as of 06:52, 23 November 2014
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3f/F%C3%BCren-W-Pano.jpg/1080px-F%C3%BCren-W-Pano.jpg)
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." — Albert Einstein
Archives
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hey bro, you interested in conducting a GA review on Rajinikanth's comeback film Ssven2 (talk) 08:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I have to pass. Maybe something else later! :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 03:52, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello Krimuk90 I saw that you keep reverting my edits and I want to know why? According to the Biyer Phool article here in Wikipedia the film released in 1996. Rani said in a interview (that I used as a source) that she started her career when she was 17. She is born in 1978. And she had to be 14 years old if the movie really released in 1992. Did you watch the movie Biyer Phool? She does not look like 14. Biyer Phool | Bengali Movie Video Songs | Prasenjit, Rani Mukherjee: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLteSRTKLf30zXopusuIGjhWosw4sBbzwl Here are some songs. Have a look. She looks like 17 not like 14. It would be great if we could agree on that topic. Thank you for your attention. Have a nice day Getoutoftheway (talk) 15:18, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- Getoutoftheway, there are sevral sources which give the release year as 1992:
- http://movies.ndtv.com/bollywood/rani-mukherjee-in-a-bengali-film-597119
- http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/celebrity-profile/rani-mukerji.htm
- http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-sundaymagazine/i-am-single-ready-to-mingle/article661869.ece
- http://www.hindustantimes.com/news-feed/chunk-ht-ui-entertainmentsectionpage-celebrityintro/rani-mukerji/article1-1042696.aspx
- http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bengali/movies/news/Aditya-is-very-down-to-earth-says-Rani-Chopras-aunt/articleshow/34102659.cms
- http://www.sify.com/news/bollywood-actor-rani-mukherji-turns-34-news-entertainment-mdvobvhfbdhsi.html
And I found none that say 1996. What say you? Are newspaper articles written by experts more reliable than Wikipedia articles, written by normal people? Kailash29792 (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- They use copy paste. No one really does rechechere these days. Here is a part of an interview of Rani Mukerji "You know my first film was Raja ki Ayegi Baraat not biyer phool. I shot for Raja ki ayegi Baraat first and then my father's film biyer phool but they released on the same day, 18th October 1996."
http://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainmenttags/rani-mukerji/must-read-rani-mukerjee-interview She even said that in an interview in video format. Saregama Bengali should know when the movie was shot. And honestly Rani M. does not look like 14 on this picture. Raja Ki Aayegi Baaraat http://www.lightscamerabollywood.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Rani-Mukherji-Biography-02-02.-jpg.jpg Biyer Phool http://www.lightscamerabollywood.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Rani-Mukherji-Biography-25-25.-jpg.jpg It does not look like that those movies were shot 4 years apart. And this website says 1996 http://www.lightscamerabollywood.com/rani-mukherji-biography/ Getoutoftheway (talk) 16:14, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- If you can provide a well-reputed newspaper or book source that says the same, then we will be able to make the change. I agree, she does not look 14, but I can't do much about it when all the newspaper sources say that. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 03:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Spuul and Bollywoodlife say 1996
- If you can provide a well-reputed newspaper or book source that says the same, then we will be able to make the change. I agree, she does not look 14, but I can't do much about it when all the newspaper sources say that. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 03:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
https://spuul.com/stars/95-rani-mukerji http://www.bollywoodlife.com/celeb/rani-mukerji/ . Is that good enough? It's very hard to do research on that topic. The movie is not even listed in Ram Mukherjees film list in imdb and he was the director. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0611550/ This article says that Rani was shooting for Raja Ki Aayegi Baaraat and Biyer Phool at the same time. http://www.telegraphindia.com/1080404/jsp/entertainment/story_9095682.jsp Thank you anyways Getoutoftheway (talk) 19:14, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the Telegraph link. It helps. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 09:58, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- so can we finally change the year to 1996?
- Thanks for the Telegraph link. It helps. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 09:58, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Getoutoftheway (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- No. Because Telegraph does not mention the year. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- Kailash29792 Telegrapfindia mentioned, that she was shooting for RKAB and BP at the same time. So when Rani says she began her carrier with 17 it has to be 1996. It's easy mathematic. It's not possible, that one of them released 4 years earlier. The other source may have copy that from Wiki how they usually do. Now we are at a point where we have many sources. Some of them say 1992 and other 1996 like this one
- http://www.bengalivideo.in/categorylist/1295/biyer_phool_(1996)/default/1
- http://www.nthwall.com/be/movie/Biyer-Phool-1996/9765400380
- https://spuul.com/stars/95-rani-mukerji
- http://www.bollywoodlife.com/celeb/rani-mukerji/
and now we have to think. Does she look like 14 in BP? No she does not. Are there videos which say 1992? No. Did she say something about BP in an interview? Yes she said, that she shot for RKAB at first and then BP but BP released first. According to Pinkvilla both of them released on the same date. 18th October 1996. http://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainmenttags/rani-mukerji/must-read-rani-mukerjee-interview Getoutoftheway (talk) 07:39, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hello there! It's me again (I just changed my username, don't be confused)
Why do I get no answer from you Krimuk90? I think 1992 is not correct and some articles say the same.
- http://www.rentreminders.com/news/Biyer-Phool.html
- http://www.wonderslist.com/top-10-iconic-bollywood-actress/
- http://celebrity.psyphil.com/rani-mukherjee-movie-list-rani-mukherji-latest-movies-new-film-released/
If you do not agree then it is OK. But the articles which say 1992 are not reliable. Isn't it better to not write a year than writing a wrong year? You see that no one is really sure. So please think about it. (please don't write, that I have to search reliable sources, because above this one there are many articles) Look at this article. They copied the whole text from Wikipedia.
It's also possible that other journalists copied the information and did no research and that is why there are so many articles which say 1992. Did you understand me? Thank you and have a nice day --Shwayze (talk) 14:15, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- I am getting sick of these! Can you provide ONE leading newspaper or book source that says 1992? You can't claim that all of them copied from Wikipedia. And how come all the sources that say 1996 are only random blog sources or sources that are unreliable; in which universe is pinkvilla considered a WP:RS! I am not doubting you, and am myself doubtful of the fact that the film came out in 1992, but on Wiki, I need to follow policy, and mention whatever is present in the reliable sources. So stop with this already, unless you can find ONE good source saying 1996. And please do not post anymore links of sites like psyphil and rentreminders etc. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 02:47, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- I am actually really sorry for bothering you. I taught Spuul is a reliable source. According to WP:NEWSBLOG blogs are reliable sources as long they have a neutral point of view (which I thing they have). If we could just remove the year it would be OK, in my opinion. It would be a good solution. Have a nice day --Shwayze (talk) 16:33, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Reliable sources and verifiability
I'd like to follow up on the message posted here by TheRedPenOfDoom, a message that you quickly removed. Wikipedia's rules about verifiability expressly state that "All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed."
(my emphasis). And that's a Wikipedia policy, not something you can choose to ignore. Thomas.W talk 15:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thomas.W The sources were already present in the article. No filmography table, including the FAs, have an inline citation for every film, when there are multiple sources in the article. I did not choose to ignore policy, and I hope the next time you post such a message on behalf of TRPoD, you check the facts and not blindly follow his lead. Also, I can choose to remove what I want from my talk page without asking for permission. Cheers! -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 01:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for my misbehaviour
Respected Samarojit Sir,I really apologize you for the misbehavior. I just wanted you to ask you that if we can add exact height of Actor Arjun Kapoor and other actors from the google knowledge graph.https://www.google.com/#q=arjun+kapoor here is the link which can help you to identify that the height information should be written or not. The height information if is incorrect then I want you to contact google to delete height information because most of the actor's google knowledge graph has first half of information is connected with Wikipedia that's way I am confused please reply me back.Mriduls.sharma (talk) 15:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
You Have Email!
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Mail-message-new.svg/40px-Mail-message-new.svg.png)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.