dablink notification message (see the FAQ) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 68:
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:06, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
==Copyright problem: Richard Haine==
Hello, and [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|welcome to Wikipedia]]! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as [[Richard Haine]], but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/3264112/Group-Captain-Dickie-Haine.html, and therefore to constitute a [[Wikipedia:Copyright violations|violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies]]. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]]. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.
If you believe that the article is ''not'' a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
*Have the author release the text under the [[Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License|Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License]] (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Richard Haine]] and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, '''Richard Haine''', in their email. '''See [[Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission]] for instructions.'''
*If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org ''or'' a postal message to the [[wmf:Contact_us|Wikimedia Foundation]] permitting re-use ''under the [[Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License|Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License]] and [[Wikipedia:Text of GNU Free Documentation License|GNU Free Documentation License]]'', and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Richard Haine]]. '''See [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for instructions.'''
*If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "''under the [[Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License|Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License]] (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0''", or that the work is ''released into the public domain'', or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at [[Talk:Richard Haine]] with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow [[Wikipedia:Guide to layout|Wikipedia article layout]]. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]].
See [[Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries]] for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [{{fullurl:Talk:Richard Haine/Temp|action=edit&preload=Template:Copyvio/preload}} this temporary page]. Leave a note at [[Talk:Richard Haine]] saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web --> — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] <span style="color:red">🍁</span> ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 12:52, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Revision as of 12:52, 11 May 2019
A Dobos torte for you!
7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:03, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Support for Alex Simpson (attorney) article
I'd like to say thank you for voting to "Keep" the article I created about Alex Simpson, the attorney for the California Innocence Project, when it was (successfully, alas) proposed for deletion. I thought your points were well taken, but these were completely ignored by the other volunteer editors, which I thought not very respectful. They were not very respectful to me, either
In case you want to see it, the history of the discussion for the proposed deletion of this article can be found here. Dylanexpert (talk) 22:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Dylanexpert I c. It is very disheartening to go through an AFD. I hope you keep writing articles. I am sorry it got deleted. Lubbad85 (☎) 23:03, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Dick Bacon) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Dick Bacon.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Hi, Interesting article, well done! I reworded some of the text as it was a bit too close to the published test and was giving a copyvio warning. All good now though, keep up the good work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren (talk) 03:03, 16 April 2019 (UTC) @Hughesdarren: Thanks for checking it out and for helping Lubbad85 (☎) 03:06, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Burst 1958-1960 Gibson Les Paul Standard has been accepted
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
~Kvng (talk) 13:42, 26 April 2019 (UTC)We have done a 5X expansion. I intend to submit a WP:DYK. I will include all the contributors. Any suggestions for a hook? 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:33, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Good morning! Good idea - Notable pre internet celebrity. I am not sure as I have never been involved in this project. Lubbad85 (☎) 13:20, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- User:7&6=thirteen Also it Seems to me that BLP claims are inappropriately used on the afd - threats to exceed 3RR etc. It is actually defined as bullying to WP:CRYCRYBLP Lubbad85 (☎) 14:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- WP:BLP is the ubiquitous go to in WP:AFD discussions. They will read it to mean what they want it to mean. At best, it is an ambiguous recitation of aspirations, not a clearly delineated policy. It's a guide, but it often can be (and is) weaponized. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:08, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Christopher Kaelin
Hi, I basically went after the usual criteria in WP:PROF and didn't directly see those satisfied. What I see so far is one article in which Kaelin was a co-author (the press release does not describe him as the principal investigator as well) and one first-author article in Science. The criterion, as elaborated in WP:PROF, is supposed to be similar to the criteria according to which a university would offer him tenure; I don't think that what is linked in the article so far would qualify. Markus Pössel (talk) 15:34, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Markus Pössel, thank you for the opinion and guidance. I am adding secondary sources. Will work to improve the article. I believe these criteria apply.
- The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.
- The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity. Lubbad85 (☎) 15:41, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chuck Whittall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Developer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Haine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pilot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Richard Haine
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Richard Haine, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/3264112/Group-Captain-Dickie-Haine.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Richard Haine and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Richard Haine, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Richard Haine. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Richard Haine with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at . Leave a note at Talk:Richard Haine saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:52, 11 May 2019 (UTC)