![]() |
ATTENTION SCUM. You are the lowest form of life on Earth. You are not even human fucking beings. You are nothing but unorganized grab-asstic pieces of amphibian shit! Because I am hard, you will not like me. But the more you hate me, the more you will learn. I am hard but I am fair. Here you are all equally worthless. |
---|
Template:DailyBracketBot Template:Archive box collapsible
Blue Jasmine Accolades page
Hi, hope you're well. I've done some recent work on one of your articles: Blue Jasmine using such articles as Black Swan and The Hurt Locker as templates for what a featured list looks like and I was wondering if you thought it was ready for submission as a featured list and if not how it could be improved. The only thing I can think of is that lead in maybe needs more detail but it's hard when the film hasn't been nominated or won comparatively many awards. Many thanks for your assistance. Cowlibob (talk) 17:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Very unhelpful edit comment
this was very unhelful, wrong, and franky WP:UNCIVIL CombatWombat42 (talk) 19:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Please stop edit warring.
Do you want some whine with your cheese? you are Edit Warring at Henrik Norby, please stop CombatWombat42 (talk) 19:20, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Now that the CSD has been officially declined: CombatWombat was right by the letter of the law, Lugnuts was right by the spirit of the law (IMO); since CSDs can cause an article to be deleted immediately, there was some urgency and thus edit-warring, while still not right, wasn't totally unjustified, so let's call this one a draw, yeah? Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:24, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not right in the spirit, the reson that phrase exsists is that a creator cannot ever be trusted to judge his own work. Lugnuts was edit warring with multiple editors. I am very happy to have you decline, as a matter of fact I probably would have declined, but why is that phrase there if not to stop this exact situation. Maybey Lugnuts, or you should try to have the conseneus template changed? not try to ignore it. CombatWombat42 (talk) 19:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note that Wombat hasn't got a clue what notability is about. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 19:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- "Cannot ever" is a pretty strong statement; too strong for my taste. Usually, you're right. That rule is in there because very frequently, when someone creates a page that's obviously not acceptable for Wikipedia, their first reaction to a CSD is to remove the tag, which prevents the CSD from being carried out. But this wasn't some spammer who had just created an article or some vandal who had just created an attack page; this was an established editor who had created a short but eminently reasonable stub that had been around for two years without problems. Moreover, keep in mind that this wasn't an A7 (no significance/importance asserted) tag, even though the WP:SPORTCRIT guideline that Lugnuts pointed out in his edit summary would've been plenty to satisfy an A7 tag (which is a lower bar than notability anyway). This was an A3 "no content whatsoever" tag, which was obviously untrue; even though it's a stub, there's plenty of content there, far more than is necessary to satisfy the requirements of A3. This was a completely different case than what the "no removals by author" is intended for, and invoking IAR to remove that tag was eminently reasonable. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- And what was the cost to Wikipedia in folowing policy and allowing any other editor to come along and decline? The way I see it the WP:IAR argument is just about the weakest one ever. I have a problem with people going around ignoring policy because they think they are better than it, which Lugnuts obviously thinks he is, no resonable admin would have speedily deleted that page and we all know it, so why not follow policy? CombatWombat42 (talk) 20:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Because it's ridiculous to have to leave a giant CSD tag that isn't even close to applicable while hoping that any admin who is passing along won't delete it out of hand without really looking at it (as much as I dislike it, it happens). There is a time for absolute, inflexible adherence to the rules (dealing with copyright violations comes to mind), but this isn't it. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 20:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- So your justification for invoking IAR is "it's ridiculous" in your opinion? That dosn't sound like something a resonable person would say. CombatWombat42 (talk) 20:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Well, that's a thought-terminating cliché. "It's ridiculous" is the best, and in some sense the only, good justification for invoking IAR. IAR is a sanity check; it's used in situations where strict adherence to the rules would lead to ridiculous behavior. Keeping a blatantly, objectively wrong tag that puts a real article at risk for immediate deletion because a rule that is designed and intended for a completely different scenario says we have to is ridiculous, and so IAR can be (and should be) invoked to remove the tag. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 20:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- So your justification for invoking IAR is "it's ridiculous" in your opinion? That dosn't sound like something a resonable person would say. CombatWombat42 (talk) 20:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Because it's ridiculous to have to leave a giant CSD tag that isn't even close to applicable while hoping that any admin who is passing along won't delete it out of hand without really looking at it (as much as I dislike it, it happens). There is a time for absolute, inflexible adherence to the rules (dealing with copyright violations comes to mind), but this isn't it. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 20:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- And what was the cost to Wikipedia in folowing policy and allowing any other editor to come along and decline? The way I see it the WP:IAR argument is just about the weakest one ever. I have a problem with people going around ignoring policy because they think they are better than it, which Lugnuts obviously thinks he is, no resonable admin would have speedily deleted that page and we all know it, so why not follow policy? CombatWombat42 (talk) 20:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- "Cannot ever" is a pretty strong statement; too strong for my taste. Usually, you're right. That rule is in there because very frequently, when someone creates a page that's obviously not acceptable for Wikipedia, their first reaction to a CSD is to remove the tag, which prevents the CSD from being carried out. But this wasn't some spammer who had just created an article or some vandal who had just created an attack page; this was an established editor who had created a short but eminently reasonable stub that had been around for two years without problems. Moreover, keep in mind that this wasn't an A7 (no significance/importance asserted) tag, even though the WP:SPORTCRIT guideline that Lugnuts pointed out in his edit summary would've been plenty to satisfy an A7 tag (which is a lower bar than notability anyway). This was an A3 "no content whatsoever" tag, which was obviously untrue; even though it's a stub, there's plenty of content there, far more than is necessary to satisfy the requirements of A3. This was a completely different case than what the "no removals by author" is intended for, and invoking IAR to remove that tag was eminently reasonable. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Henrik Norby for deletion
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henrik Norby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henrik Norby until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:26, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
London is, in fact, full of smog because of all them darned chimbley sweeps, "Moirey Pappins". Martinevans123 (talk) 08:48, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't know how else to contact you, please stop editing my comments
Beat it
|
---|
Editing my commments, even on your talk page is inappropriate, as you did in this edit, you are welcome to delete the section, but you are not welcome to edit my comments exculsivly. Please see this converstion, you are materialy changing my coments. Please revert your changes. CombatWombat42 (talk) 16:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC) |
ANI notice
More twattery
|
---|
|
Disambiguation link notification for April 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Charles Belcher (cricketer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Caernarvon
- Robert Minns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Malaya
- Robert Morris (cricketer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Harrow
- Walter Fairbanks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Chatham
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Visual effects nominees that link to other pages (AKA a studio or something like that)
Like I noticed this for one of the guys nominated for Starship Troopers-Alec Gillis, it goes to a studio-wonder if I should make a page or what, just found it odd that some of them did. (Granted there are classic cases when you go to a DAB page and it will say something like joe smith-dogcatcher and link somewhere) I just left him unlinked on a page I just made as it felt odd. But yeah it is interesting. On another note-there is some writer who wrote Mad About Music who was nominated that I can find NO info about, she has only one other credit and that is it. Wgolf (talk) 19:20, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Okay the 2 visual effects artist that link to the visual page
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Amalgamated_Dynamics Looks like 2 Oscar people. (One of them won for Death Becomes Her even) Not sure why they were created as redirects.
Then of course there are some people who I've considered adding but the IMDB pages seem to be for someone else or something. (A interesting one-this guy who won for Marooned oddly has a different named person listed on the IMDB, on here and the official AMPAS site he is Robbie Robertson (special effects artist), but on the IMDB it says some guy named Robbie Robinson who I don't even think is the right guy as this guy as only screenwriting credits....) Wgolf (talk) 16:11, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
I can't set coordinates--Many baks (talk) 20:46, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Um Thron und Liebe
Yeah, I knew that already. Sorry, a bit of a brain short circuit on that one. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 20:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Clarence Barr
Hi there -
I was looking at Clarence Barr since I occasionally try to clean up articles with year of death missing/date of death missing. I wondered how you determined his birth/death dates or if they were from IMBD. I suspect they're not right but before I poke around anymore I thought I'd check in with you as the article creator.
Thanks very much!
Mfbjr (talk) 20:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
ICC Cricket World Cup 2014
Hi, plaease have a look at that page as the older editions doesn't have any separate pages for knock outs and the MOM and match results have been removed unlike the previous tournaments. Vin09 (talk) 08:24, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Case of me trying to figure out if these 2 are married or related....
Okay so I added a page for the visual effects artist Scott Stokdyk, in the process I found a Danielle Stokdyk, who has worked with him a couple times, granted this is a very unusual name so I've been trying to figure out if this is his wife or not to add it to that infobox part (I really don't want to make a very awkward mistake and find out that it was his sister) Well have a nice editing day! Wgolf (talk) 17:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Helena Bergström (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to The Ferris Wheel
- Kate Broadmore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Taranaki
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Sorry to create work for ya if I moved it to the wrong place. I saw there is also a 1911 film version, but I doubt it needs a separate article. It appears the 1911 version is derived from The Rajah (play) since William Young the playwright is credited on imdb. The 1919 Harold Lloyd film might also be derived from the play, I don't know yet.--Milowent • hasspoken 14:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Way He Looks.jpg
![⚠](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:The Way He Looks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:05, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
discussions of interest re Le Meraviglie
this one and this one. 101.161.14.40 (talk) 12:26, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
"Insect"
No more please, Lugnuts. Your point would have been better taken without that. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:58, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maurice Mollin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deurne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Hey Lugnuts, no more reverts--you're in 3R territory. If they restore that information, let someone else handle it, OK? Drmies (talk) 19:18, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- They've been blocked for 60 hours. ANEW is slow sometimes, but it worked. Drmies (talk) 17:08, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- And how in the hell did you manage to create 18,000 articles? A long and unemployed career? Kudos... Drmies (talk) 19:20, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Well kind of have taken a break from adding names
Yeah I still do every so often but then it was getting crazy ha ha, I am currently patrolling older articles though (I did just put a afd on some lady who did a costume design for one film with no awards) But I did manage to complete the sound list, makeup and costumes are almost done. Visuals I have no idea-some names are a bit off-like some guy on the IMDB has a completely different name even! Editors and cinematographers-I really don't like to add that much due to how some of them link to too many pages. Anyway have a nice day!Wgolf (talk) 20:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Bracket Errors on 29 April
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cyrille van Hauwaert may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {[{{Belgian National Road Race Championships (men)}}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:05, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 08:21, 30 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
331dot (talk) 08:21, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Re: 2014 Ürümqi attack ITN
Would you like to reconsider your vote of the ITN nom now that the article has been created and expanded? Cheers! —Bloom6132 (talk) 13:52, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Are you going to support the nomination now that the article is well-developed? —Bloom6132 (talk) 07:29, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Brazilian cinema
You're welcome. Apparently you and Dr. Blofeld (who worked a lot on the lists of Brazilian films) were the first ones to work devotedly on creating several articles of Brazilian cinema. So, obviously, you deserve credit too. Hm, off-topic and at the risk of being rude: why do you always have to do a pointless edit after someone edit an article you created? e.g [1], [2], [3] Initially I thought it only with me, but it's not: [4], [5], [6]) Gabriel Yuji (talk) 16:05, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Joseph Dervaes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Gent
- Odiel Van Den Meersschaut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Gent
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Foul Play (1977 film)
The reason why I added the hatnote was because as I was searching for the American film, I didn't know which year it was, and the titles don't say "American" or "Spanish", so I clicked on the 1977 one. When I saw that it wasn't the right one, and there was no link to the 1978 one, I had to do another search. I see no reason why having a hatnote would do any harm, and if having one would have helped me, it may help someone else. --Musdan77 (talk) 17:22, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi Lugnuts! In moving a citation to a movie review, I think you deleted the byline (author) and the date of publication. It puzzled me a bit, since a reader should want to know these things. Anyway, the best I can do from the various guidelines to citation is WP:CS#Newspaper articles, which does recommend that authorship and publication date be specified. Is there something else I'm missing? Cheers, Easchiff (talk) 17:23, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Bracket Errors on 7 May
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kenchappa Varadaraj may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- '''K. V. Varadaraj''' ({{lang-mr|ಕ್.ವ್. ವರದರಜ್}}); 7 May 1924 – 20 December 2011)<ref name="death">{{cite web |url=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/213211/olympian-footballer-
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:10, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
AWB
As regards your posts at User talk:Masssly#AWB.
Are you aware of the CCI request regarding this editor? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:44, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Australian National Road Race Championships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David McKenzie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
bot
Good for stopping the bot because I had to add "skip if only whitespace is changed". Though I still not understand why you do not follow the "2 blank lines before stub" rule. -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Bracket Errors on 12 May
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Murray Hall may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * [[Murray Hall (cyclist)]] (born 1953)), Australian cyclist
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:46, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 12 May
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Machan (2008 film) page, your edit caused a cite error (help). ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Grace of Monaco protection
Hello! I would like to request a consideration on protecting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_of_Monaco_(film) because of the unregistered user who keeps on adding puff pieces in the reception section (mostly from reviews of unknown blogs when there are dozens of reliable reviews from well-known publications). It is an obvious tactic to "soften" the panning of the film, especially Kidman's performance. Chocolate Charlie (talk) 19:41, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Tamara Makarova
I'm quite familiar with WP:V and WP:BURDEN. Allow me to quote: "Editors might object if you remove material without giving them time to provide references; consider adding a citation needed tag as an interim step.[3] When tagging or removing material for lacking an inline citation, please state your concern that there may not be a published reliable source for the content, and therefore it may not be verifiable.[4] If you think the material is verifiable, try to provide an inline citation yourself before considering whether to remove or tag it." You did not give me the consideration of time or attempt any independent verification. I realize that simply deleting something is much faster, but it is not in the spirit of collaboration or improvement. Factchecker25 (talk) 13:43, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Bracket Errors on 17 May
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jonathan Teplitzky may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- [[Category:Year of birth missing (living people)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:48, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Bracket Errors on 22 May
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Maddalena (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- [use dmy dates|date=May 2014}}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:31, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Council election articles
Hi Lugnuts. Well done for starting all the election articles, but be careful with the categorisation - a lot of election categories are at "Footown Council elections", not "Council elections in Footown". Cheers, Number 57 19:20, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Bexley Council election, 2014 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Bexley Council
- Camden Council election, 2014 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Camden Council
- Greenwich Council election, 2014 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Greenwich Council
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Invite
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
As I found sources dated 5 months after the supposed cancellation that gave us information on casting and production, and while almost tempted to improve the darn thing and argue a keep under WP:NFF (paragraph 3, I do feel enough sources are available to justify it being written of somewhere within these pages even if not in its own article. I thus added a well-sourced short paragraph at Peter Hewitt (director)#Career, and ask that you support a redirect. Best regards, Schmidt, Michael Q. 09:32, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Bracket Errors on 25 May
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Goodbye to Language may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Or]] in the main competition section at the [[2014 Cannes Film Festival]] and won the [[Jury Prize (Cannes Film Festival|Jury Prize]] sharing it with [[Xavier Dolan|Xavier Dolan's]] film ''[[Mommy (
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:36, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Since you previously had proposed the template for its deletion, I am letting you know that I nominated the template for deletion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 May 25#Template:Jackie Chan Films. Aspects (talk) 23:56, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Bracket Errors on 26 May
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Deaths in April 2004 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * [[Nagaraja Rao], 89-90, Indian cricket umpire
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
"1919"
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1919_%28film%29&oldid=prev&diff=609069675 Why undo my edit? --RThompson82 (talk) 20:38, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Lugnuts. You undid my edit to this redirect with the comment "per WP:NCF." But WP:NCF doesn't apply here. That page says that the title of the article about the film should be American Beauty (1999 film), and I'm fine with that. But it doesn't say anything about what the target of the redirect American Beauty (film) should be. Look at Wikipedia:Partially disambiguated page names. There are several examples of film title redirects just like this one: Wizard of Oz (film), which redirects to Wizard of Oz (1939 film); and Chicken Little (film), which redirects to Chicken Little (2005 film); as well as numerous examples involving other types of works (albums, songs, TV series) that are analogous. I invite you to reconsider your position. [EDIT: I see that since the guideline cited above was written, other editors have changed the targets of those two film redirects, but I think the principle is still valid.] --R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Bracket Errors on 27 May
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Asad Rauf may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * [[List of One Day International cricket umpires]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
A pie for you!
![]() |
Just because. Magioladitis (talk) 06:59, 28 May 2014 (UTC) |
I could really use your help moving as many to English titles as possible and filling in a lot of the short stubs!♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:21, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Edit warring
You're over 3RR in your edit war on We Are What We Are (2013 film). I suggest you self-revert yourself. If you're really adamant about this ridiculousness, I suggest you take it to the talk page. Or I guess you could force us to bring you to WP:ANEW. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:02, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Australian cricket team in India in 1996–97, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter McIntyre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Sunit Ghosh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Poorly referenced BLP.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 11:02, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Sunit Ghosh for deletion
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunit Ghosh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunit Ghosh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 14:11, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Minor thought
Hello. Thanks for all your extremely helpful edits. One thought -- I don't think it is helpful to delete currently unused line items that may conceivably be used later, such as "nickname", from infoboxes. Best. Epeefleche (talk) 21:22, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
57th Berlin International Film Festival
Hi, just wanted to ask do you know why 57th Berlin International Film Festival article got deleted. I mean there are number of similar pages likes this article.--Jockzain (talk) 14:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- It was same in style and information as 56th Berlin International Film Festival and there are number of other film festival articles like that. That's why I am wondering, why only delete this particular one. I already asked for a reason to deleting admin so let see.--Jockzain (talk) 18:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help. I have added more details and references in it and moved it back.--Jockzain (talk) 17:04, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Mankading
Thanks for the kind words, pal. Just a word about the transfer of content to the lead section: I think you've gone a little overboard with it. The mankading incident was just one moment in the tour, and yet now the article would seem to be all about it if you only read the lead. Perhaps if we cut it down and added prose accounts of each match in the respective sections? – PeeJay 19:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Argentina at the 1928 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Francisco Rodríguez and José López
- Great Britain at the 1928 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to John Middleton and Ernest Chambers
- France at the 1928 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Henri Lemoine
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Newark by-election, 2014
Evening Lugnuts
You're bigger and bolder and scarier than me, could you look at the above article, the vandalism by User:Bobdylanlol, and take out your whacking stick, please? I feel that a firm hand is needed. I'm on revert duties. Ta v much doktorb wordsdeeds 22:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Re Machan film
Hi Lugnuts, how are they hanging, lol. I have seen an edit to Machan (2008 film) with the edit ref saying "remove n/n blog deleted via AfD" dated "as of 08:52, 12 May 2014". I am not too sure what the edit summary is telling me, however this edit broke a reference. Can you confirm to me for my edification what the edit summary is saying and can you confirm therefore it is ok for me to delete this now unused reference. Cheers The Original Filfi (talk) 09:40, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Karl John (actor)
I feel so sorry for you because I was making a contribution by trying to improve an article.
Your last revert reason that the German version is "user generated" is so weak I find you attempts to stop me trying to improve this article really upsetting and disconcerting.
What do you have against the actor Karl John?
Yet it is quite stable from the German article how uncontroversial it is, with the last edit summary showing that the last edit was on 21 March.
No one in Germany is getting upset so why are you?
Yeah why are you so upset about this article? You don't edit or add material all you do from your edit summary is taking stuff out and thinking up a reason so it doesn't sound like WP:IDL. 81.129.123.28 (talk) 11:45, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Denmark at the 1928 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Henry Hansen
- Luigi Tasselli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Virgilio
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Kubilius
Re [7]: which other article? Because he's not dead, so there is a mistake somewhere else that needs to be corrected. Thanks, Renata (talk) 16:30, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- Mystery solved. BE article used this template for the end of his Prime Minister term (!?). So I fixed the template and it's all good now. But maybe the template that you put on articles could incorporate where the problem is coming from - otherwise, people (like me) will not know where to look to fix the issue. Thanks! Renata (talk) 16:46, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
WP Film in the Signpost
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Film for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 22:49, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
?
You sneaky bastard. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:00, 16 June 2014 (UTC)