Content deleted Content added
Amusing... |
→Amusing...: A very bored individual is all that person is. At least there are enough sane folks on Wiki to recognize nonsense when they see it...so he seemed to be quickly reverted now whenever h |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
==Amusing...== |
==Amusing...== |
||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&oldid=105151285] (scroll to bottom, see "Look This Is Our Viewpoint") and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IPCC_Fourth_Assessment_Report&diff=105152046&oldid=105151743] Sounds like a Cplot [[strawman]]. --[[User:AudeVivere|Aude]] <small>([[User talk:AudeVivere|talk]])</small> 19:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC) |
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&oldid=105151285] (scroll to bottom, see "Look This Is Our Viewpoint") and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IPCC_Fourth_Assessment_Report&diff=105152046&oldid=105151743] Sounds like a Cplot [[strawman]]. --[[User:AudeVivere|Aude]] <small>([[User talk:AudeVivere|talk]])</small> 19:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
:A very bored individual is all that person is. At least there are enough sane folks on Wiki to recognize nonsense when they see it...so he seems to be quickly reverted now whenever he posts his stuff.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 20:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:11, 2 February 2007
Posting
Just for your information, consensus and majority doesn't rule on Wiki. -Signaleer 19:52, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- It depends on the circumstances. I don't disagree with you at all about majority or consensus as they aren't the only things that decide content, but the important thing for you is do what you can to work with others as well as possible. Three seperate complaints on the noticeboard on your editing patterns doesn't indicate you are trying to work well with others. I know you can do better than that and encourage you to do so.--MONGO 21:05, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
The niggle
MONGO, you endorsed the indefblock of Cindery with reference to the four recent blocks. I'm the first to admit I haven't researched the case—no time—but I have a niggle of doubt. This is a little unusual, isn't it? I have an e-mail from the user also. If you have information which puts this indefblock out of doubt, would you mind sharing it? Best, Bishonen | talk 01:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC).
Amusing...
[1] (scroll to bottom, see "Look This Is Our Viewpoint") and [2] Sounds like a Cplot strawman. --Aude (talk) 19:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- A very bored individual is all that person is. At least there are enough sane folks on Wiki to recognize nonsense when they see it...so he seems to be quickly reverted now whenever he posts his stuff.--MONGO 20:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)