Re:Journey
I didn't use the developer commentary because I've never heard it! Feel free to add in anything from it that seems helpful, though I may come around behind you and clean up/rearrange things. As to the story section, maybe post your proposed section on the article's talk page first? I tried actually to not interpret the story in the first place, since then it becomes kind of original research, but if you've got sourced changes, then that can only improve the article. --PresN 16:44, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
List of featured articles listed at Redirects for discussion
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/40px-Information.svg.png)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of featured articles. Since you had some involvement with the List of featured articles redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Relentlessly (talk) 21:31, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Million Award
![]() |
The Million Award | |
For your contributions to bring Birdman (film) (estimated annual readership: 4,681,070) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Bobnorwal (talk) 14:42, 21 May 2015 (UTC) |
Thank you for your work on such a high-traffic, highly visible article! Bobnorwal (talk) 14:42, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
GA Review
Birdman (film), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Blethering Scot 11:52, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Stop making serial reverts against Wikipedia policy
Reply to Neuroxic: You appear to not be following the Wikipedia process for Talk page discussion and refraining from editing the article page until you have established consensus for your position on the Talk page. You appear to be serially reverting text which is in agreement with the delisting editor who identified issues with your writing and issues with your research WP:OR. If you have miscounted, then note that you have been informed that you have serially reverted text three times at this point, and that you do not appear to be making any constructive refinements to the text. You ought to be following BRD guidelines the same as all other editors at Wikipedia and not be making serial reverts. MusicAngels (talk) 15:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Dear User:Neuroxic -- User:MusicAngels has been penalized in other squabbles involving reverting editors and generally exhibiting disruptive behavior. Apologies all around.
- Neuroxic, I have no problem with you reverting. Just remember that as an admin I have something like a sworn duty to try and keep this place troll-free, so there is really no need to yell at me. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 00:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Drmies:, sure, but this issue will be sorted out soon anyway. I'm currently following up the appropriate admin procedures. Musicangels has had a recent history with disruptive editing, so reverting the edit made by the person around may not be that helpful in this case. Neuroxic (talk) 00:56, 30 August 2015 (UTC)