MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs) →February 2019 at Women in Red: new section Tag: |
|||
Line 591: | Line 591: | ||
*[[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Unblock_request_from_User_talk:Rickyc123]]-- Hasteur has posed a question. Please respond here.-- [[User:Dlohcierekim|<b style="color:black">Dloh<span style="color:red">cier</span><span style="color:gold">ekim</span></b>]] ([[User talk:Dlohcierekim|talk]]) 18:16, 25 January 2019 (UTC) |
*[[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Unblock_request_from_User_talk:Rickyc123]]-- Hasteur has posed a question. Please respond here.-- [[User:Dlohcierekim|<b style="color:black">Dloh<span style="color:red">cier</span><span style="color:gold">ekim</span></b>]] ([[User talk:Dlohcierekim|talk]]) 18:16, 25 January 2019 (UTC) |
||
In response to {{ping|Hasteur}}: |
In response to {{ping|Hasteur}}×: |
||
A way in which I can prove that fighters reach notability is by using sites such as Sherdog or relevant media articles which prove these fights have occurred or that they will achieve notability. Before I got banned, I often used fighters profile on the UFC website which I also believe to be a suitable source to use. Before creating any MMA article I need to ensure that the subjects have had at least 3 top tier fights or are scheduled for a 3rd fight in a top tier promotion. I can use articles of fight announcements or results to prove they are notable. |
A way in which I can prove that fighters reach notability is by using sites such as Sherdog or relevant media articles which prove these fights have occurred or that they will achieve notability. Before I got banned, I often used fighters profile on the UFC website which I also believe to be a suitable source to use. Before creating any MMA article I need to ensure that the subjects have had at least 3 top tier fights or are scheduled for a 3rd fight in a top tier promotion. I can use articles of fight announcements or results to prove they are notable. |
||
Line 600: | Line 600: | ||
I now know that the reason I shouldn't copy within Wikipedia is that everybody should gain attribution for what they create themselves (for copyright reasons and it easier to see who did what when looking at edit history). I now know what I should've done in these cases is that instead of copying and pasting the drafts and then improving it. I should have move the drafts first and then improved it. And rather than trying to copy and pasting it to a name I thought was better. I should have tried to merge the two articles or requested a name change. Can't apologise enough, I didn't really see the severity or issue at the time. [[User:Rickyc123|Rickyc123]] ([[User talk:Rickyc123#top|talk]]) 18:27, 25 January 2019 (UTC) |
I now know that the reason I shouldn't copy within Wikipedia is that everybody should gain attribution for what they create themselves (for copyright reasons and it easier to see who did what when looking at edit history). I now know what I should've done in these cases is that instead of copying and pasting the drafts and then improving it. I should have move the drafts first and then improved it. And rather than trying to copy and pasting it to a name I thought was better. I should have tried to merge the two articles or requested a name change. Can't apologise enough, I didn't really see the severity or issue at the time. [[User:Rickyc123|Rickyc123]] ([[User talk:Rickyc123#top|talk]]) 18:27, 25 January 2019 (UTC) |
||
Replying to {{ping|Hasteur}}: |
|||
I'm sorry but I still don't quite understand what you want me to do however from what I gather or think you want me to do. I believe that although Wikipedia doesn't need to include information such as how many takedowns or significant strikes are included in each fight or the betting odds as such sites such as tapology include. The only information which is required is the date, information, location, round, round time and method of victory an example I can show you I have produced below of Shane Burgos. |
|||
{{MMA record start}} |
|||
|- |
|||
|{{yes2}}Win |
|||
|align=center| 9–0 |
|||
| [[Charles Rosa]] |
|||
|TKO (punches) |
|||
| [[UFC 210]] |
|||
| {{dts|2017|April|8}} |
|||
|align=center|3 |
|||
|align=center|1:59 |
|||
| [[Buffalo, New York]], United States |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|{{yes2}}Win |
|||
|align=center| 8–0 |
|||
|Tiago dos Sabtos E Silva |
|||
|Decision(unanimous) |
|||
| [[UFC Fight Night 102]] |
|||
|{{dts|2016|December|9}} |
|||
|align=center|3 |
|||
|align=center|5:00 |
|||
| [[Albany, New York]], United States |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|{{yes2}}Win |
|||
|align=center|7–0 |
|||
|Jacob Bohn |
|||
|KO (punch) |
|||
|CFFC 56 |
|||
|{{dts|2016|February|27}} |
|||
|align=center|1 |
|||
|align=center|4:52 |
|||
|[[Philadelphia, Pennsylvania]], United States |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|{{yes2}}Win |
|||
|align=center|6–0 |
|||
|Terrell Hobbs |
|||
|TKO(punches) |
|||
|CFFC 45 |
|||
|{{dts|2015|February|7}} |
|||
|align=center|1 |
|||
|align=center|4:03 |
|||
|[[Atlantic City, New Jersey]], United States |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|{{yes2}}Win |
|||
|align=center|5–0 |
|||
|Bill Algeo |
|||
|Submission (Rear-Naked Choke) |
|||
|XFE 46-CFFC 42 |
|||
|{{dts|2014|October|25}} |
|||
|align=center|2 |
|||
|align=center|2:35 |
|||
|[[Chester, Pennsylvania]], United States |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|{{yes2}}Win |
|||
|align=center|4–0 |
|||
|Donald Ooton |
|||
|Submission (guillotine) |
|||
|CFFC 35 |
|||
|{{dts|2014|April|26}} |
|||
|align=center|1 |
|||
|align=center|3:10 |
|||
|[[Atlantic City, New Jersey]], United States |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|{{yes2}}Win |
|||
|align=center|3–0 |
|||
|Myron Baker |
|||
|Submission (Rear-Naked Choke) |
|||
|CFFC 31 |
|||
|{{dts|2014|February|8}} |
|||
|align=center|2 |
|||
|align=center|2:12 |
|||
|[[Atlantic City, New Jersey]], United States |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|{{yes2}}Win |
|||
|align=center|2–0 |
|||
|Ashure Elbanna |
|||
|TKO (punches) |
|||
|Ring of Combat 46 |
|||
|{{dts|2013|September|20}} |
|||
|align=center|1 |
|||
|align=center|2:16 |
|||
|[[Atlantic City, New Jersey]], United States |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|{{yes2}}Win |
|||
|align=center|1–0 |
|||
|Ratioender Melo |
|||
|Submission (Rear-Naked Choke) |
|||
|Xtreme Caged Combat-Vendetta |
|||
|{{dts|2013|July|26}} |
|||
|align=center|1 |
|||
|align=center|2:14 |
|||
|[[Philadelphia, Pennsylvania]], United States |
|||
| |
|||
{{end}} |
|||
In terms of when fights of should be updated. Usually with high profile fights such as UFC fights. The result is on Wikipedia within minutes and usually reliable websites such as MMA mania and mmajunkie also have articles on the results within minutes. So it is very easy to find reliable news resources of fight results. |
|||
== February 2019 at Women in Red == |
== February 2019 at Women in Red == |
Revision as of 17:42, 28 January 2019
Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).
Welcome!
Hello, Rickyc123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ✉) 15:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Chase Sherman
Nice work on the Chase Sherman page! Gave it a look over and threw up some extra info in there to bolster it some more. Udar55 (talk) 14:31, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
References
In the future, at the end of articles, please include a section Notes or a section References. Under that, please include a reflist, so your references display there. Example:
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
Thanks.Elliot321 (talk) 17:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
[User talk:Sir Sputnik|talk]]) 14:49, 16 October 2017 (U
RfA
Hi Rickyc123, thanks for volunteering to serve the community as an administrator - your enthusiasm is appreciated! A while back, an essay called WP:NOTNOW was written, and I think your RfA is going to be opposed for the reasons listed there. We expect our administrators to have a wide breadth of experience and knowledge, which in 10 months and 942 edits can't be overly demonstrated. Don't fret though! Take a look at some of the advice listed here, and consider withdrawing your RfA before it is closed early. On behalf of the community, thank you for creating awesome articles (such as UFC 218) and contributing - it really is appreciated, and in time you'll be ready to become an administrator. Perhaps have a look at how to help with vandalism and get involved in some more administrative tasks? If you need any help, or have any questions, let me know -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 12:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Your RfA was closed as WP:NOTNOW
Thank you for taking the time to begin the process of requesting adminship. Your RfA has been closed per WP:NOTNOW based on the discussions there. I encourage you to carefully review all of the comments made there and on the talk page, and then implement any suggestions you think will increase your chances should you choose to put yourself forward as a candidate in the future. After some time has passed, please consider running again. We appreciate your time, and look forward to seeing you as a candidate again in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kostas20142 (talk • contribs)
- @Kostas20142: You linked to the talk page in your own RfA. You should be focusing on content (which Rickyc123 does) and leave the busy work well alone. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Ritchie333: fixed --Kostas20142 (talk) 14:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
It's a redirect.Xx236 (talk) 12:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
MMA articles
There is a long standing consensus described in WP:NMMA. Three top tier fights. Personally I don't get to bothered by close but the last one was to far and really not that notable in context.PRehse (talk) 20:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
2018 Kids' Choice Awards moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2018 Kids' Choice Awards, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Kerman Lejarraga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NBOX as the WBA international title is not considered a notable non-world title.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 03:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Rickyc123. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:PreciesJJ continues to add unsourced info, no discussion
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:PreciesJJ continues to add unsourced info, no discussion. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 18:13, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Template:Z48
A page you started (Sean O'Malley (fighter)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Sean O'Malley (fighter), Rickyc123!
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this messageMerry Christmas and Season's Greetings.
To reply, leave a comment on Abishe's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Abishe (talk) 04:05, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Redirects for deletion
Hi, just wanted to make you aware I've nominated a set of redirects you created for deletion on Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. All the best, HornetMike (talk) 15:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, I see you've immediately recreated a number of the redirects that were deleted at the conclusion of the discussion. Please could you desist in doing that. HornetMike (talk) 16:49, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- I've (re)deleted them per WP:G4. -- Tavix (talk) 18:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of UFC 229
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on UFC 229 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:43, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic ANI noticeboard.
Warning
Since you're not communicating at AN/I, where I tried asking nicely, now I'm warning. Your penchant for cut-and-paste moves has resulted in a drain of time and effort on the part of other editors, and continuing to do so will be considered disruptive, and will result in a block. Please thoroughly review WP:MOVE, and only move pages as instructed there. Cut-and-paste moves literally require effort to clean up after, and are only performed by incompetent users, or users who are trying to falsely take credit for creating articles. Neither will be tolerated. Thanks, Swarm ♠ 00:27, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Sources
Hello, can you please add your sources to UFC 225? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 08:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
- Also UFC 232. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 08:19, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to join Women in Red
![]() We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.41% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Ipigott (talk) 12:10, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Why can't you just move drafts?!
Your latest article Kalindra Faria was clearly taken from Draft:Kalindra Faria, and while you at least made some effort to paraphrase and add some new content, things like the infobox and the mixed martial arts record table were clearly copied from the original draft. If you are going to make an article based so heavily on someone else's draft, why not just move the other editor's draft to the mainspace and make your changes/add new content after? And once more, the draft you based your article on was undergoing the AfC process and will now be rejected on the basis that the article already exists. Pinging Swarm who might want to weigh in on this behavior. Bennv3771 (talk) 16:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
OH my god are you actually serious is this what is going to happen every time I make a new article now. I've learnt from my mistakes and I don't copy drafts. This article was done a 100% by me I included everything manually myself and I didn't use anything from the draft. I hadn't even looked at the draft. How stupid do you think I am that I would use a draft especially after already being given a warning like a week ago.Rickyc123 (talk) 16:25, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Rickyc123
I've seen the draft now and mine and their copy is completely different. We've used different sources, put in different information and the Infoboxes and the record table are different. It annoys me because it took me like 3 hours to make that article and for you to say I haven't done anything and I've stolen it Bennv3771 really takes the biscuits.Rickyc123 (talk) 16:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Rickyc123
- Truly an amazing coincidence that there are so many similarities, including this same sentence: "In 2017, Faria was set to make her UFC at UFC 216 against Andrea Lee, however as Lee had previously failed a drugs test, USADA required her to be in the testing pool six months before competing, causing her to pull out." Even the grammatical error (should be "drug test" not "drugs test") and the missing word (it should be "make her UFC debut") are exactly the same! Bennv3771 (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
OOOOH! Bennv3771 I made one spelling mistake and that makes me somebody who's copied something and every single UFC fighters article when talking about their debut uses that same format of at what year, at what event and against who it is. The bit about USADA, I copied from this article here.[1]Rickyc123 (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Rickyc123
- We are talking about the same wording and exact same sentence structure and the exact same spelling mistake and the exact same missing word. This article you linked uses a completely different sentence structure and wording: "Lee, a first-time UFC fighter, was removed when it was discovered she had a previous anti-doping violation, which required her to enter the USADA drug testing pool for six months prior to fighting in the octagon." Bennv3771 (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
It's as though you're not listening to what i'm saying everybody when talking about drugs tests and debuts in MMA articles uses that format when describing UFC fighters debuts. And nobody calls it a drug test, everyone calls it a drugs test although it may technically be a drug test. I obviously had to reword what was in the article to make sure it sounded right on Wikipedia. And as for the rest of the article tell me where I've supposedly stolen from. That is just 10 words in about 500 words tell me if I copied everything where did i get all that research I had to do myself to find out who she fought, I had to get sources to prove they've fought that person. In fact there infobox is better than mine and has more stuff in it. So if I was such a perfectionist and liked to steal things tell me why I wouldn't just steal all the good bits if I stole it. Bennv3771 Rickyc123 (talk) 17:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Rickyc123
- No point arguing it between us. Let's wait to see if User:Swarm wants to weigh in, otherwise I will bring this to ANI. And I most certainly do not think that you are in any way a "perfectionist". I don't know where you got that idea from. Bennv3771 (talk) 17:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Sure now when you can't find anything else that says I copied from a draft. You try and end the conversation but every time you had supposed "evidence" you'd come back and reply straight away. For once when now I actually am in the right. I am looking forward to seeing what User:Swarm has to say about this.Rickyc123 (talk) 17:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Rickyc123
The two revisions:
Mine- Kalindra Faria - anything after my edits was extra Drafts- Draft:Kalindra Faria - Anthing added after Acogshots edits are extra
References
February 2018
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Bennv3771 (talk) 04:22, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
If you create any more articles before the ANI thread is resolved I will block you. --NeilN talk to me 04:45, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Ricky, I see you're taking yet another break during an ANI complaint, but unfortunately we cannot let this ago any more. No mitigating factors have been provided at ANI, and your defense was not believable to anyone. Given the severity and willfulness of what comes down to copyright infringement, I have blocked your account indefinitely. Swarm ♠ 05:08, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red
![]() ![]() ![]()
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Raoni Barcelos listed at Redirects for discussion
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/30px-Information.svg.png)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Raoni Barcelos. Since you had some involvement with the Raoni Barcelos redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PRehse (talk) 19:18, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Rickyc123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
When blocking me the admin only waited for 3 people to agree with him all of which have had problems with me in the past and I have never ever vandalised at all in any of my contributions and they have all been good faith edits. When you look at the edits they had a problem with it was like 6 out 1602 edits I've ever made and if it means anything I won't copy and paste drafts because I really don't want to be blocked and it's just annoying when I see little things like an article that has links to the wrong person with the same name and I can't correct it/
Decline reason:
This wasn't just "6 edits", there was a history of multiple times where you took drafts and published them as articles you did yourself. Adding that the only reason you were blocked was people "had problems with you" leads me to believe this block is valid and needs to stand. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:05, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
April 2018 at Women in Red
![]()
| ||
To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or
Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: |
91st Academy Awards listed at Redirects for discussion
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/30px-Information.svg.png)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 91st Academy Awards. Since you had some involvement with the 91st Academy Awards redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:6978:E68F:A981:8B0D (talk) 08:56, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Love Alarm
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Love Alarm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~~ CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 10:12, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Love Alarm listed at Redirects for discussion
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/30px-Information.svg.png)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Love Alarm. Since you had some involvement with the Love Alarm redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ~~ CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 15:10, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
CORRECT AN ARTICLE PLEASE
Hey User: CASSIOPEIA, I was wondering if you could change the article Hayder Hassan as I can't. In his mixed martial arts record boxit says he last fought Felipe Portela however this is false as he fought Pavel Kusch and not Felipe Portela. Thanks--Rickyc123 (talk) 11:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
May 2018 at Women in Red
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Wiki Loves Food
![Curd Rice](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/58/Curd_Rice.jpg/100px-Curd_Rice.jpg)
Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 02:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Mara Romero Borella listed at Redirects for discussion
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/30px-Information.svg.png)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mara Romero Borella. Since you had some involvement with the Mara Romero Borella redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PRehse (talk) 07:41, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Women in Red June Editathons
![]()
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2018 at Women in Red
![]()
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Speedy deletion nomination of SummerSlam (2018)
Hello Rickyc123,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SummerSlam (2018) for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Xevus11 (talk) 02:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
August 2018 at Women in Red
![]()
| ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
September 2018 at Women in Red
![]()
| ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
October 2018 at Women in Red
![]()
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Speedy deletion nomination of Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2019
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2019 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Dimsar01 Talk ⌚→ 09:30, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Get ready for November with Women in Red!
![]()
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December 2018 at Women in Red
![]()
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
December 2018 at Women in Red
![]()
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
January 2019 at Women in Red
![]()
![]() January events:
|
Riot Girls (film) listed at Redirects for discussion
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/30px-Information.svg.png)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Riot Girls (film). Since you had some involvement with the Riot Girls (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 19:32, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Unblock request and discussion
I have copied over this request for unblock and the unblock discussion from this talk.
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1b/Appointment_yellow.svg/48px-Appointment_yellow.svg.png)
Rickyc123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Blocking administrator: blocking administrator (talk)
Reviewing administrator: pending AN disxussion -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:05, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Request reason:
After the blocking administrator has left a comment, do one of the following:
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.
{{unblock reviewed|1=I realise now what I did at the time was incredibly immature but I believe that now after over a year of not editing. I have learnt my lesson and will not persist in the copying within Wikipedia violations as I can now see how it actually negatively effects Wikipedia. I am genuinely sorry with what I did and would like to redeem myself and help to improve Wikipedia. I could make a new account as I'm going to University this year however I genuinely want to redeem myself and not make a new account based on trying to hide my identity as the past owner of the Rickyc123 account. I am remorseful of what I did and would politely ask if you could please lift this permanent editing ban for life you have on me as I wouldn't be lying if I said it doesn't annoy me when I see MMA fighters or boxers for example whose record boxes are incorrect and or not updated. Thank you and sorry for my past violation ~~Rickyc123~~|decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed|1=I realise now what I did at the time was incredibly immature but I believe that now after over a year of not editing. I have learnt my lesson and will not persist in the copying within Wikipedia violations as I can now see how it actually negatively effects Wikipedia. I am genuinely sorry with what I did and would like to redeem myself and help to improve Wikipedia. I could make a new account as I'm going to University this year however I genuinely want to redeem myself and not make a new account based on trying to hide my identity as the past owner of the Rickyc123 account. I am remorseful of what I did and would politely ask if you could please lift this permanent editing ban for life you have on me as I wouldn't be lying if I said it doesn't annoy me when I see MMA fighters or boxers for example whose record boxes are incorrect and or not updated. Thank you and sorry for my past violation ~~Rickyc123~~|accept=Accept reason here ~~~~}}
- Hello. What's different this time from last? What will you do instead?-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 11:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Dlohcierekim: I wouldn't copy within Wikipedia as I did before and also if you look at all the edits I made apart from my violations, they were constructive. It was only a minority of my edits where I violated the rules although by admission, I shouldn't have even done this in the first place. I am also now willing to accept liability for what I did wrong. ThanksRickyc123 (talk) 13:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Rickyc123
- Thanks. Awiting swarm-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:41, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Swarm: I suppose this would need to go back to ANI as it was imposed at THIS discussion.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 11:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- If unblocked, I believe there must be a WP:TBAN on article creation for 6 months of active editing without further problems.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 11:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hey, so the way I worded everything, this wasn't officially a consensus-based block, but a discretionary one. However, I think there was a fairly strong consensus in support of an indef, and I agree that it should probably go to
AN/IAN. ~~Swarm~~ {talk} 20:00, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- You can respond to the AN thread here and it should be copied over to AN.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:08, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hey, so the way I worded everything, this wasn't officially a consensus-based block, but a discretionary one. However, I think there was a fairly strong consensus in support of an indef, and I agree that it should probably go to
ani thread re unblcok
- Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Unblock_request_from_User_talk:Rickyc123-- Hasteur has posed a question. Please respond here.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:16, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
In response to @Hasteur:×:
A way in which I can prove that fighters reach notability is by using sites such as Sherdog or relevant media articles which prove these fights have occurred or that they will achieve notability. Before I got banned, I often used fighters profile on the UFC website which I also believe to be a suitable source to use. Before creating any MMA article I need to ensure that the subjects have had at least 3 top tier fights or are scheduled for a 3rd fight in a top tier promotion. I can use articles of fight announcements or results to prove they are notable.
- Please explain how copying within Wikipedia works.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:20, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
In response to @TonyBallioni::
I now know that the reason I shouldn't copy within Wikipedia is that everybody should gain attribution for what they create themselves (for copyright reasons and it easier to see who did what when looking at edit history). I now know what I should've done in these cases is that instead of copying and pasting the drafts and then improving it. I should have move the drafts first and then improved it. And rather than trying to copy and pasting it to a name I thought was better. I should have tried to merge the two articles or requested a name change. Can't apologise enough, I didn't really see the severity or issue at the time. Rickyc123 (talk) 18:27, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Replying to @Hasteur::
I'm sorry but I still don't quite understand what you want me to do however from what I gather or think you want me to do. I believe that although Wikipedia doesn't need to include information such as how many takedowns or significant strikes are included in each fight or the betting odds as such sites such as tapology include. The only information which is required is the date, information, location, round, round time and method of victory an example I can show you I have produced below of Shane Burgos.
Res. | Record | Opponent | Method | Event | Date | Round | Time | Location | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Win | 9–0 | Charles Rosa | TKO (punches) | UFC 210 | April 8, 2017 | 3 | 1:59 | Buffalo, New York, United States | |
Win | 8–0 | Tiago dos Sabtos E Silva | Decision(unanimous) | UFC Fight Night 102 | December 9, 2016 | 3 | 5:00 | Albany, New York, United States | |
Win | 7–0 | Jacob Bohn | KO (punch) | CFFC 56 | February 27, 2016 | 1 | 4:52 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States | |
Win | 6–0 | Terrell Hobbs | TKO(punches) | CFFC 45 | February 7, 2015 | 1 | 4:03 | Atlantic City, New Jersey, United States | |
Win | 5–0 | Bill Algeo | Submission (Rear-Naked Choke) | XFE 46-CFFC 42 | October 25, 2014 | 2 | 2:35 | Chester, Pennsylvania, United States | |
Win | 4–0 | Donald Ooton | Submission (guillotine) | CFFC 35 | April 26, 2014 | 1 | 3:10 | Atlantic City, New Jersey, United States | |
Win | 3–0 | Myron Baker | Submission (Rear-Naked Choke) | CFFC 31 | February 8, 2014 | 2 | 2:12 | Atlantic City, New Jersey, United States | |
Win | 2–0 | Ashure Elbanna | TKO (punches) | Ring of Combat 46 | September 20, 2013 | 1 | 2:16 | Atlantic City, New Jersey, United States | |
Win | 1–0 | Ratioender Melo | Submission (Rear-Naked Choke) | Xtreme Caged Combat-Vendetta | July 26, 2013 | 1 | 2:14 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States |
In terms of when fights of should be updated. Usually with high profile fights such as UFC fights. The result is on Wikipedia within minutes and usually reliable websites such as MMA mania and mmajunkie also have articles on the results within minutes. So it is very easy to find reliable news resources of fight results.
February 2019 at Women in Red
![]()
![]() February events:
|