Universalrahu (talk | contribs) →Serious problem: new section |
Universalrahu (talk | contribs) Forgot to add username |
||
Line 260: | Line 260: | ||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you add [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|unsourced]] material to Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced4 --> |
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you add [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|unsourced]] material to Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced4 --> |
||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research policy]] by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. <!-- Template:uw-nor4 --> |
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research policy]] by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. <!-- Template:uw-nor4 --> |
||
--[[User:Universalrahu|Universalrahu]] ([[User talk:Universalrahu|talk]]) 12:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:43, 11 May 2020
Welcome!
|
April 2015
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Nakon 03:49, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
April 2015
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/25px-Information.svg.png)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pallava dynasty has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pallava dynasty was changed by Sangitha rani111 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853654 on 2015-04-23T03:51:03+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:51, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Sangitha rani111, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
![]() |
Hi Sangitha rani111!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:21, 24 April 2015 (UTC) |
Vanniyar
HI, I think it might be best not to worry about this issue and just undo it. The point is fairly minor and sometimes it is better to let small things pass. They can always be fixed at a later date by using other sources etc to elaborate on things. As it is, some people might think you are now edit warring, and that is not a good situation to be in. So, all things considered, I think you should revert that change.
I am not an admin, by the way. I'm not sure if you were referring to me in the edit summary or not but the chances of me becoming an admin are incredibly small. Obviously, I do have a lot of experience, especially in this subject area, but ultimately when it comes to content issues there is no difference between an admin, an experienced editor like me and a complete newcomer: we are all equal. Hope this helps. - Sitush (talk) 15:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Please follow the thread of the discussion before reverting changes. Its not a good practice to revert just because you can do it so 'cause it just creates a mess of things. Its always best to follow talk pages(both article and user's). Merkcid (talk) 18:49, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
General Sanctions
—SpacemanSpiff 19:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pallava dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
July 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Reddy, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:41, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
April 2016
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Varna (Hinduism). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:11, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Vellalar doesnt mean water or shower water it means Spear
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vel_(film) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.80.216 (talk) 20:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Sangitha rani111. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Sanctions
Since you are once again making poor contributions to caste-related articles, please note the alert that was given to you in 2015, which is still on this page, and also the following information. - Sitush (talk) 08:45, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Amazing abilities!
Verifying information doesn't exist in a book which is not online in seconds. Jim1138 (talk) 09:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Sangitha rani111. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mukkulathor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kallar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Discretionary sanction reminder
Since it's been over an year since you were last informed of these prevailing sanctions in your area of editing, I am reminding you of them again.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
In particular, the Mukkulathor article is under active arbitration remedies and "only accounts older than 30 days and with at least 500 edits" are allowed to edit the article itself; so for now please restrict your edits to the article's talkpage. Abecedare (talk) 04:23, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mediterranean Sea, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 18:09, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khagan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Hamburg, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:43, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Use of "a" v. "an"
Suggest reading EnglishPage.com A vs. An. Or, try searching for "a an". Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:08, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:09, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Sangitha rani111. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pannaiyar Caste, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Group (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Serious problem
Hi! Your edits seems to be not constructive in building Wikipedia. Many edits seems to be contrary to existing Wikipedia policy and guidelines. You have already been warned for violating Wikipedia terms in the past for numerous times,[[1]], [[2]], [[3]], [[4]], [[5]] including Level 3 warning [[6]] for nonconstructive edits on related topics. You have been blocked also for breaching terms on Vanniyar topic already. Now you have reached again in the same topic to make disruptive edits. This edit [[7]] removing reliable cited source content is an complete section blanking which may violate some Wikipedia strict policy like Vandalism and other policies. Have you ever made some reference to WP:PRESERVE before blanking such content? This edit [[8]] reinstating unsourced content despite from clear edit summary for removing such content, also shows you are not familiar with Wikipedia's core policy Verifiability. Do not create hoaxes by doing so. See also Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point for more details. Refering to this edit [[9]] you have made some close paraphrasing which may violate WP:COPYRIGHT. By this revert [[10]] you have reinstated another POV content attributing to wrong source. Another [[11]] edit to Agnivansha is at high for your POV edits for adding some senseless stuff into it without any citation to reliable sources which fails core policies like no original research and Verifiability. Your tendentious editing may be disruptive in building Wikipedia. Past and recent edits show some strong case of conflict of interest in Vanniyar related topic. Many warnings related to General sanctions South Asian social groups have been already made in past. Always bear in mind that Wikipedia gives weight to policy and guidelines rather than content related issues. Already despite of blocking there seems to be chances for banning for continuously breaching Wikipedia policies. The community generally assumes good faith and if you need to explain your views you are free to do it. In failure for proper response this issue will be addressed to Administrator's intervention.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article.
--Universalrahu (talk) 12:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)