User_talk:TDC/Archive_1 User_talk:TDC/Archive_2 user_talk:TDC/Archive_3 user_talk:TDC/Archive_4
Thursday June 27th 02:12
Depleted uranium dispute resolution
As agreed, I had the DU article unlocked and replaced it with the /basic verson with links to the Health effects and Gulf War syndrome pages, bringing this round to an end. I think the fact that we managed to hammer this out by ourselves is a feather in our caps and an example to all who are in conflicts on the 'pedia. I thank you all. --DV8 2XL 01:22, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- Hip Hip! DTC 02:51, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
FYI...if that edit war starts again and I see you post to AN/3RR, I'll block him. I think you request was overlooked due to unsympathetic admins and I just now noticed it,,,he/she appears to have moved ona bit though.--MONGO 05:56, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
TDC or DTC?
Why did you change your sig to read DTC? Any reason in particular, or just felt like it? Just curious. --LV (Dark Mark) 00:49, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- I was feeling frisky. DTC, ''T''en ''D''ead ''C''hickens 05:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 00:51, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Fair enough. ;-) --LV (Dark Mark) 01:57, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Final decision
The arbitration committee has reached a final decision in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Winter Soldier case. Raul654 21:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Hi TDC, I hope you can give up your edit warring. I imagin every editor you've tangled with is saying to themselves about now:
- hmmm... how can I provoke TDC, shouldn't take much more to get him banned from the whole project.
- Don't take the bait :) For what its worth I think the resolution was a good one. --Duk 23:14, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- I say forget about that article, I am done with it! Time to take it off my watch list and move onto someone else. All I ever wanted to do was to bring the anon to the table and force him to play on a level playing field and play by the rules like anyone else would have to (as I myself have been forced to), and now that I have accomplished that, I will never respond to him again. I would say the ruling was good one as well. There is no way I can honestly say that I did not act inappropriately from time to time, because I did, no way to deny it. But I have learned from my mistakes, and have been able to compromise with many disparate users on many different articles. This whole process has been a drain of epic proportions, and I am dancing with glee about the fact that other editors who have given up on the WSI article can finally get back to it without being molested to the point of a mental explosion by what can only be described as the most deceptive and malicious user I have ever run across. The resolution was good, and if it takes sacrificing my ability to edit in order to deal with Rob the Earthlink Anon, then so be it.
- But I want to say thanks for all the advice, I still owe you some GT pictures, don’t I? Ten Dead Chickens 23:24, 3 February 2006 (UTC)