I want to avoid an edit war with you. But I've reviewed your edit history and this leads me to an assumption that you are a Lady Gaga fan writing with a bias. Please cease undoing my edit or I will report you. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/96.63.238.198|96.63.238.198]] ([[User talk:96.63.238.198|talk]]) 04:13, 10 April 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I want to avoid an edit war with you. But I've reviewed your edit history and this leads me to an assumption that you are a Lady Gaga fan writing with a bias. Please cease undoing my edit or I will report you. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/96.63.238.198|96.63.238.198]] ([[User talk:96.63.238.198|talk]]) 04:13, 10 April 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::Don't worry, I'm afraid he has done this countless times since April 2010, he is a very evil person. And I've also reported him several times, but I shall never give up in my fight to have his Wiki account blocked forever.
Hello, Tbhotch! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! fetchcomms04:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed your notifications regarding a couple of my FAs. Unfortunately User:Tiptoety is repeatedly blocking me at the moment so it's difficult for me to log in. I've also been briefly stalked by User:Risker, which was frightening to say the least.
I'm VERY sorry I missed Battle of Musa Qala on the main page. That involves real people, real deaths, and on-going difficulties.
But some of the administrators are really scary people these days and I hestitate to contribute to the site.
In all the vandal reverting some wires got crossed and I think I overwrote your addition of the protection template. Can you double check and make sure I didn't break something? Millahnna (talk) 05:56, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Berlin Wall
I read the citation page. No citation needed cuz it says "This requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations." Please put my edit back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghbvgy (talk • contribs) 05:59, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I was wondering if you are able (or interested) in contributing photos of places in and around Mexico City? WhisperToMe is looking for some photos of buildings in DF, and I only know of a couple of editors in the area. I rarely get up that way now that I can fly international out of Oaxaca. Saludos --nsaum75!Dígame¡08:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here are the photo requests:
Volaris headquarters - Prolongación Paseo de la Reforma 490 piso 1 Col. Santa Fe Peña Blanca México DF, Delegación Álvaro Obregón C.P. 0121
Interjet headquarters - Prado Sur 230, First Floor, Colonia Lomas de Chapultepec, CP 11000, Mexico City, D.F. - Map
Secretariat of Public Security headquarters - Avenida Constituyentes 947, Ex Hacienda de Belem, Deleg. Alvaro Obregón. C.P. 01110. Ciudad de México
Aeromar headquarters - Hangar 7, Zona "D", Terminal de Aviacion General, Col Federal, Mexico DF, 15620, Mexico"
Aviacsa headquarters - Hangar 1, Zona "C", Col. Aviación Gral. [...] Aeropuerto Int. de la Cd. de México. C.P. 15520
And if you are willing to go to the Toluca area, there is:
Federal Social Readaptation Center No. 1 (Prison) - Santa Juana, Almoloya de Juárez, State of Mexico (Only get the main entrance sign - While there is one as seen in this document it may be best to get a sign that you see when first going into the compound, as I understand that prison authorities may not permit you to actually enter the compound) - If it is not possible to get a photo of the sign, please let me know and I will try to use the photo in the SSP document as a fair use photo, citing that it is not possible to get a representative photo of the prison
Alternatively I could e-mail the prison authorities and see if they are willing to relicense that photo and/or produce a free photo
Have you seen the Gwen Stefani perfume commercials? I could care less about the fragrance, but I like singing a long to her songs that it seems everyone has forgotten. --ĈÞЯİŒ1ооо17:37, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Assistance with editor
Since you've edited many album article, I'd like to ask for help with a troublesome editor, Markelmitchell, who makes unconstructive edits to album articles on a daily basis, specifically to track listings by adding boldface, small scripts, and other unexplained, unnecessary changes, such as to In My Own Words. I've posted warnings at his talk page, but he has not gotten the message. Would you help in any way? Dan56 (talk) 02:14, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly the same three weeks ago, excepting that my userpage was attacked 20 times, including some death thrats of my British fan, and it is now move-protected, Grawp's PSP is broken, so he's having fun moving pages again. Anyway, nothing new with me. And we'll see you in May, take care. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞06:23, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This essay contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. Essays may represent widespread norms or minority viewpoints. Consider these views with discretion. It is not a Wikipedia policy. I do not obey essays. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞06:45, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have a response to that, but in the interests of remaining as civil as possible, I will withhold my remarks and simply tell you that I don't appreciate being templated. In the future, if you have a concern with one of my edits, please do me a simple courtesy and leave a brief, more personal, message. Have a nice evening, sir. Strikerforce (talk) 06:48, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, except for the fact that I did nothing worth being templated over. Here are my edits to that article[3][4] and [5]. How did that warrant a template message on my talk page? The only thing that you even remotely could have templated me for was a result of someone else's mistake in an edit that I reverted to, in the interest of the information in that edit being accurate.Strikerforce (talk) 06:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind. This is a pretty stupid discussion to be having. My point is, I believe you acted too quickly and in error by templating a regular which, essay as it may be, is a practice that is not done by a majority of the users with whom I've interacted. I'm not thrilled about it, but it's small stuff and they say that you shouldn't sweat the small stuff. Have a good night, sir. Strikerforce (talk) 07:07, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
public markets, mercados públicos or what?
I am working on a general article about mercados públicos/mercados municipales for English WP.... and Im trying to decide whether to name it Mercados públicos (Mexico), Mexican public markets or what. Got an opinion?Thelmadatter (talk) 03:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not a big priority (I agree with the reversions), but I'd like a few examples. I doubt it's actually CharlieJS13: he edits using a DSL line out of British Telecom. This editor is also British, but using a different network. It's not Greenock125, either. —Kww(talk) 19:27, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
About Diner Dash and all Dash of the game series
Hi, I want to add link to Diner Dash page and other but semi-protected, then I seen at page history and you are the last editor, now can you help me add link to page???
I have become aware of your notifications to major contributors of forthcoming TFA appearances on the Main Page, which looks to be a useful service. I wonder whether you might copy such a note to the talk page of the articles involved, so that anyone with the page on their watchlist will be aware: I am prompted to this by recent discussion at Talk:Thoroughbred. I guess sometimes the main contributor cannot be easily identified, or might be on a wikibreak. Kevin McE (talk) 22:18, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ANI / Assistance w/editor
Pertaining to my previous post to you, I made a post at WP:ANI concerning user Markelmitchell, after another editor's response to my report of the user at WP:AVI. Here's the "ANI-notice" that the ANI noticeboard said to post to anyone in the discussion, if you'd like to add something. Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 00:49, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit summary
Hello... while I do regret (and apologize for) inadvertently undoing your rearranging of the template order at Basketball, I also feel quite strongly that your edit summary - "Thanks for your rollback missuse" - was out of line and rather inappropriate. Even the most cursory examination of my edits to the article tonight would have clearly indicated that they were in good faith and beneficial. In future, please just leave a note on my talk page to draw my attention to any inadvertent errors, instead of making snide comments in edit summaries. --Ckatzchatspy04:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nate Dogg
Not sure you would see this on my talk page, so I included here for your convenience:
I disagree with your interpretation of my comment. I was not attacking any users in particular (therefore no personal attacks) but the fascist regime that requires me to sign-in to pay proper tribute to a great artist now lost. That is to say, if such restrictions were not arbitrarily placed on this "sum of all human knowledge" then my constructive contributions would be made directly to the article and not the discussion page (as outlined in the "Be Bold" section of the Wikipedia Welcome). Further, if there were to be a personal attack made, I would call into question your ability to logically reason and command the English language as you want me to "rephrase [my] comment as a civil criticism of the article" when there were no criticisms of anything but the article present in my comment; simply that the article had a minor misspelling that I would have liked to have fixed but could not due to restrictions imposed by "someone else". And even then, if I were to make such statements about your frivolous and vulgar abuses of power, I would argue that it my saying so would be less of a personal attack and more of an observation of circumstances. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.55.118.152 (talk) 06:36, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
sorry sorry sorry...
...I didn't mean for you to have to clean up after me with all the pp-semi templates; I was just trying to stay on top of the IP and meant to come back and add them after. Cheers for that, --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots20:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Adding LGBT project to GNAA talk
Are you sure it is a good idea to add the LGBT studies to the GNAA talk page? I will defer to your judgment on it, but I just wanted to bring it to your attention that it may not be the best move in light of the nature of the group. Monty84503:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The most insulting here is "a bunch of nerds" (written by a geek BTW). Anyway if I where you I would not reply, I'd remove it, it seems to be a random forum comment. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞08:03, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Time to go to bed, if you see him/her returning to forum-kind comments and/or attacking people again, contact an admin. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞08:16, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the following numbers:182.177.161.219, 182.177.194.23. Somebody on these numbers continuously vandalising on pages like: Derawali ,Riyasati, Jangli etc. One of these two numbers you already have warned. Please stop this person or numbers. Can these pages be saved?--Khalid Mahmood (talk) 10:07, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
About vandalism on your user page.
Hello there Tbhotch.I am Damirgraffiti.I would like to remind you that an IP user vandalized your user page.Don't worry though.We've been able to revert back to the way it was.One of the warners also reported the IP user to the Administrators.He's blocked, so he can't vandalize your user page.Check your page history for more info.--Damirgraffiti (talk) 18:19, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Help Needed! Vandal!
Hi! Are you an Administrator or able to ban Vandals? If so, could you please look at the developing situation on the Robert Falcon Scott article, where I am trying to introduce accurate text, but it is being deleted without reason or explanation by Ruhrfisch. I have warned him , but no use. Thankyou. (204.112.57.130 (talk) 02:14, 28 March 2011 (UTC))[reply]
Sorry to involve you in this - the IP has already earned a 3RR block. I am an admin, but am reluctant to block him or her as I am involved in the dispute. Ruhrfisch><>°°02:20, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
HAlo
The FAC brought up a query about researching print sources. Here are a few scanned magazines you might wanna take a look at (not sure how relevant): [6][7] (I can't view this one) [8] (Jivesh might be able to help you with French) [9] and [10] (in German). Good luck with the FAC!! :D Adabow (talk · contribs) 06:14, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article is only about that she knelt down in Australia 10 October 2009 to sing "Halo" to a girl she brought onstage. Barely 3 lines. Do you still want me to translate it? Jivesh • Talk2Me16:12, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
To tell you frankly, editors at FAC are too demanding. The composition section is already great. By the way, i do not think he was talking about the composition section only. He wanted to verify if the article contains all the information that can be found on it on reliable sources. Just tell him a YES. Jivesh • Talk2Me16:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wait i just figured out what he means. I think that he wants more information on recording and production (of course only if there is) and the information should not be from magazines. I will try find some. Jivesh • Talk2Me16:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You are most welcome. This is the least i can do after that you have helped me so much in the past.
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
For supporting me, keeping me company, believing me, and for being my friend. And kind as well as patient, obviously. I would not have acquired such good editing skills without your your help. Thanks! Jivesh • Talk2Me16:39, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot for telling me that. You are a true friend. I really wanted to give you that barn-star. I will keep on posting links. I have not finished. Jivesh • Talk2Me17:00, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I will continue my research tomorrow. i am going to bed for now. By the way, i hope you know that the new single of Beyonce is coming out in April 2011? Jivesh • Talk2Me17:03, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my God. I am happy that she did not really sang like this. It was a false (tricked) tape only. If she starts singing like that, that would be a complete disaster. You are most welcome. See you tomorrow. Jivesh • Talk2Me17:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
@Novice, neither iTunes or Amazon are "unreliable", and you had to argue otherwise. Neither source is unreliable unless it has a characteristic listed here or it is blacklisted. Here, Nikki argued that Yahoo! "blog" is unreliable because of the use of the word "blog", I denoted her that this was not true at all, so you have to do two things a) Defend the article the most you can and b) Still being flexible about reviewers.
Hope you have read my message above. Tbhotch, i want to ask you something but i am a bit scared. Please do not get me wrong. You count a lot for me, more than you think. I mean that you are a very good friend on Wikipedia and everyone here on Wikipedia is like my second family. What i want to ask is that, are you sure Nathan vandalize your talk-page? I mean, don't you suspect someone else... Someone with whom you had a fight, other than Nathan. Please do not be angry Tbhotch. I just wanted to ask. I know you consider me as a good friend (I saw it here and i feel very happy to be in that short list) and i do not want to lose your friendship. Try to think about what i told you with a cool mind. Trust me, you are not the only one to have had problems with Nathan. I have suffered from kind of a fate (February 11, 2011 but was not so serious). I am not taking his side. I just want you both to clear your misunderstandings (if there is any). I am telling you once again my friend, i left you this message with a good intention. Try to think about it. I will wait patiently. Jivesh • Talk2Me12:16, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For the first point, I believe I'll request a copy-edit, could you recommend me one? I remember an user has helped you before with those things. For the second, as I said at his SPI, I like to know why an IP vandaiize my page. I immediately recognize if I already know that user, for example, if this IP starts with 86.xxx.... I know he is CharlieJS13 (talk· contribs), but this IP has nothing to do with me (apparently) until I saw his edits to Theuhohreo page. You better than no one knows that he has done nothing to no one. Peter argued he never had contact with him, but he is in the same Wikiproject that Nathan used to participate. After I saw that the IP comes from Miami, I first thought in him, but well, I was not sure until I saw that "I come from Miami Beach", and all fit. I'm not angry with this Jivesh, and in some measure an indef block (which is not the same as infinite) is excessive, but a kind of action had to be done he has a long-term sockpuppetry abuse. According to the SPI, he was caught on the IP autoblock, so, I have nothing to say about this. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞19:42, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, just wanted to know why There Are Rules got a C rating. (This sounds like a bitchy "This article deserves better than this!" post, but trust me, it's not.) It has a fair deal of prose and sources already, but I trust your judgement. Mostly I'm interested in what you feel I can do to fix it up going forward. Thanks! Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 19:26, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
He wasn't in the film that IP added: this user has caused a major problem creating fake characters and assigning actors to them. I'm having a hell of a time cleaning up after his considerable messes, and I don't want to screw up your table on that page. Could you remove that film from his filmography? I'd appreciate it :> Doctalk08:00, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, unless you read the sources, you won't know whether or not they have valuable information you might need, be it about the songwriting or recording or promotion of the record. It's up to you to determine if those sources have something you might need or if all there is is just miscellany--my main concern was to make sure you you can exhausted all source options before we proceed further during the FAC process. If you still need to research sources, I suggest withdrawing the FAC at this point. WesleyDodds (talk) 05:59, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for stopping 85.210.103.45 (talk). My talk page was also subjected to vandalism, and thank you for deleting the affected revisions as well. DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 21:47, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
His block has been shortened after he confessed and agreed not to repeat. Can you explain to me what is going on? What is he so angry with you about?—Kww(talk) 21:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tbhotch, I don't want to bother you, but I'd like to make a question, if you don't mind. Portuguese naming convention is the same as in the United States: the first name is the given name, then (usually) comes the surname of his mother and lastly the father's surname. Why an explanation in the article, then? Regards, --Lecen (talk) 11:30, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that, but does that means that we will have to add this kind of note to every single article about a Brazilian or a Portuguese? --Lecen (talk) 19:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
After your latest edit's Fleetham went and deleted most of the citations and then claimed that there were no citations. This type of behavior is highly disruptive and is hostile in this case. If you view the Lanix history you can see that Fleethan has had some type of long standing disdain for this company for whatever reason and he has also gone and removed refrences sourced even from the Lanix website. Multiple users have asked him yo stop yet he continues with blatant disregard to other opinions. You can see that other users have tried with no luck to negociate with him but he refuses to accept their views. And the sources he says are illigitimate are not "weird blogs" SPK (Sputnik) is Mexico's largest and most respected electronics information network and one of the largest and most repected in latin America And if their text isnt enough proof you can simply watch the videos in their articles used in the citations which feature Lanix emlpoyees themselves stating what is also in the text. While i don enjoy Fleethams input around wikipedia, this type of behavior is unacceptable 75.80.58.122 (talk) 03:32, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Halo suggestion
Well, that was an interesting outcome! Tough place. May I suggest that you list it at WP:GOCE/REQ, and that when you start the next FAC you comment about how Yahoo and About.com are reliable, as the prose quality and reliability of sources were the only major concerns? Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
rolls eyes* Something really needs to be done with FAC. I mean, it's not like there are going to be fewer candidates in the future. It's a shame that so many articles fail because there aren't enough reviewers. Anyway, good luck...! Adabow (talk · contribs) 06:15, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Halo, ummm i feel like it is angelic, you know it feels like you can see angels when you hear it and anyone, it's just like you see their face instantly when you hear it.
(Day 2)... The music video is very intimate, romantic and the house in which we are shooting is beautiful. And i am trying to make sure that we can get to the pool because i think it could be really beautiful. I have never open my eyes in the water ever in my life. I have always been afraid. Halo, it's very simple but it has a lot of strings and it also has interesting drums , ummm it is a great mixture of hip hop and R&B and it is basically saying that you know i had these walls built up about love and you completely tore that down and you know when i look at you i see your halo, it's really beautiful."
Listen Tbhotch, i really have no idea whether this is going to be useful but i did it because you do a lot for me and it is kind of a way through which i can thank you. Jivesh • Talk2Me12:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to bother you again, but could you perhaps give me a quick bit of assistance here Talk:Lanix. Thankfully an adminstrator has reverted Fleethams constant edits and the page is currently blocked from editing but Fleetham is has shown no sign that he is planning to accept what numerous other users have written. 75.80.58.122 (talk) 16:47, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lanix Concensous
On the Lanix talk page we are now voting on a concensous to see what to do with the Lanix article. We need you to prove that our view is correct. If Fleetham honors the concensous then we can simply get him to stop the edit war by coming to a concensous that we are correct simply by having both of us explain why our position is correct. Please Help here Talk:Lanix. 75.80.58.122 (talk) 20:14, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have several ongoing arguments (six months long) with this user (fleetham) and his actions always follow the same patterns. I would recommend reporting him, this style of editing (deleting nearly an entire page and replacing it with chopped up tiny sections, studded with references but wothout any real content) is a persistent habit of his. ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃ (talk) 15:31, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
to avoid an edit war
I want to avoid an edit war with you. But I've reviewed your edit history and this leads me to an assumption that you are a Lady Gaga fan writing with a bias. Please cease undoing my edit or I will report you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.63.238.198 (talk) 04:13, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry, I'm afraid he has done this countless times since April 2010, he is a very evil person. And I've also reported him several times, but I shall never give up in my fight to have his Wiki account blocked forever.
In that order: yes, fortunately no and no :( (XD), and I don't know why he still here, Kevin's good faith should end someday, do we need really people like this? I don't think so. Anyway, he gives a crap about polices, why we have to continue with this? And I think the hit you had helped you to forgot your pals' advices, hadn't it? Tbhotch* ۩ ۞08:21, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In truth I feel bad for Kevin because that guy has trusted him so many times. Its everytime Kev is the one who feels perturbed by it. And yeah, I thought of explaining about the policy things, but then I noticed those heinous comments. Whoosh goes my faith! And when the hell will Jivesh learn what is joke and what isn't? And hmmm hmm, mail me bout the oomp oomph.. :) — Legolas(talk2me)08:38, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Legolas, i respect you a lot for what you do for all of us but i sincerely feel that you have a big problem with me. You always have something to say about me. Well, i swear it does not affect me in any way when you tell something about me but please keep Beyonce away. I really do not like it when you or anyone else compare her to a banshee or something similar. Even when it is a joke. Jivesh • Talk2Me08:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok then is Beyonce a hag Jivesh? Grow up. Axl, I still remember when American Life failed you had said "Now Legolas will be happy", lol I was like wtf is this dude talking? And I'm impressed you kept your hoe copyright shut :P — Legolas(talk2me)08:56, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the advice. I will definitely grow up but i will never become like you. Simply because i am not like you. I mean, you can tel people things straightforward but will never be able to do so. I always try to be very polite (i do not know if this is the right word). Anyway, thanks for the advice again. Jivesh • Talk2Me09:00, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well Legolas, I was trying to improve that crappy article and instead of help me with it, you started to bite this newbie ad ABF about me. What did you expected, chocolates? Tbhotch* ۩ ۞03:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why you did not pay much attention, did you? The page was protected because an user was attacking me. At first I didn't recognize him, but after I realized that this was a geek (click here for know why). So, well, that's why. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞05:10, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oopsies, now geeks are targeting us too? I thought Gleeks were enough :P Hey Bee's new song "Girl" sounds hot! I'm scared to talk about it with Jivesh though. — Legolas(talk2me)05:27, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, we have to do something with Halo, WoW and GoW, those bastards will pay!!! And I didn't know about that, you know, in my country when a song is released elsewhere most of time it arrives 2 months later, excepting with highly (but very highly) known artists. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞05:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Girl" has this amazing sample by Diplo called "Pon de Floor". You can find it in YouTube. Have you heard the "Born This Way" Indian remixes? They are great! — Legolas(talk2me)05:56, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, nowadays artist calls everything a sample when it is a blatant plagarism. And generally, I don't like remixes, but exist very few exceptions like "Scream Louder" and "Naturally (Dave Audé Remix)/(Dave Audé Club Mix)". And it's me or Jiv is gagging? Oh and by the way, Jiv I added the information you gave me, do you have the location? Thank you so much. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞07:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's really me. Lol. Tbhotch, you do not have top thank me so much. Trust me, you are most welcome. I will always be happy to help, especially when it concerns Beyonce. Sorry, i do not have the location. Try to ask Adabow. Jivesh • Talk2Me10:27, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not strictly a remix, but Tbhotch have you heard Love in This Club Part II? Also sampling isn't really plagarism coz the original artist must agree to the sample first. And OMG Diplo song first Legolas? I've wanted to hear what the BK vs Diplo track sounds like... and it's a "club banger"? I wouldn't expect him to produce a dancey song? Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well that's what artists say at night to sleep ;), BTW, Andy (if I call you Andy), do you have the I Am... Platinum?, if you, could you please bring me the location of the "Behind the scenes"? Thank you so much. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞18:51, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Protection request
I didn't notice until after you removed the attempt at protection for Canadian Pacific that I either did it wrong or don't have permission to do it. The page seems to be getting a lot of vandalism lately. As such, I would like to request protection for the page as it is a page that children may visit and material added at times has been vulgar or offensive. Thank you. Daffydavid (talk) 08:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, I never properly thanked you for reassessing articles for Latin American music articles. So, thank you very much! I really appreciate it! Magiciandude (talk) 01:52, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha! So something like this would have a proper summary to the samples right? I also that example posted on the guide was odd where it said: "16 second sample from Bob Dylan's "All Along the Watchtower". I've added more description for the samples on Romances. Also, I don't know why it does it twice. I selected the "audio sample" from the licensing tag selection. Magiciandude (talk) 01:53, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well that's odd, because I haven't copy/pasted anything. What I've done is fill out the form in the template, and selected the correct licensing form. I meant to say in the earlier post that the above article is another good example, I'll use that as well. Magiciandude (talk) 02:18, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Talk:Automobile
That was strange, I semi'd it and it obviously didn't take. I deleted it after I semi'd it, so that must have removed protection. Will wait and watch... Dreadstar☥18:47, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ys, that's the reason, if you delete a page, you delete everything. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 18:51, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your huge efforts in fixing vandalism. However, I was surprised to see that you didn't completely fix the vandalism on Burj Khalifa. I have fixed it now, but please take care that vandalism may be made on top vandalism. Rather than simply revert the last edit, it is often best to go back to the last good version. watchlisted Astronaut (talk) 08:59, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Gee that was fast! ;) hang onto your hat, next week hubby and I are exploring Chiapas.... so lots of pics coming and articles to be (re)written!Thelmadatter (talk) 18:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Invitation to take part in a pilot study
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes. cooldenny (talk) 19:21, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Since apparently you are watching my age I'll reply here. I personally do not like to invite people to review my GANs, FLCs and FACs because it would be considered as a canvassing vote. You should wait people to comment, it's normal when no one comments, very few people review featured candidates. Anyway you withdrew its nomination, so for now, you have to work more on it. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞19:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings! In reviewing our discussion on my talk page, I regret that I responded curtly to the objection you raised to my disambiguating talk page comments. I could have engaged you more respectfully, and I apologize for not having done so. Since you raise an interesting point, I will seek consensus of the community regarding my interpretation of talk-page editing policy before I make additional edits of this nature. Cheers! bd2412T18:28, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, can you check Talk:Haus of Gaga? A number of editors are apparently writing there that it is an A-class article. I'm completely baffled because the article is just shit. Are these all socks? Youu are better at it. — Legolas(talk2me)14:39, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
lol for the first, and for the second, probably. Either way, it hardly meets the C-class criteria of either Wikiproject. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞15:23, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Tbhotch, I understand that SVG is preferred but If you go to the official website you can see the logo exactly as the version I uploaded, so this SVG version is a bad version, thanks for worry about Real Madrid logo but I think that is preferred an official version than a non-official SVG format against PNG. Also, for reasons of copyright is better a low resolution, my image complies this and is not the intention of Wikipedia to facilitate higher versions of non-free logos as SVG allows. A salomonic solution is to upload a SVG version of the image that I uploaded (you can download the EPS image at the source url that I put in the summary description: http://www.vflnet.com/infos/spain/real_madrid_cf/) but I don't know how to convert an EPS file to an SVG file, if you can do it for me, I will appreciate. Greetings tot-futboltalk19:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Halo (Beyonce) Copy edit request
Hi, I saw your request on the GOCE page and reworked the section so it should flow a lot better now. You'll note that I've removed a few sentences as some of them seemed to be somewhat synthy and the same refs were cited several times. I've added your talk page to my watchlist so it will be easier to keep the thread here if you have any comments. --Blackmane (talk) 00:03, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for doing it, and I have not problem with the changes, I didn't write that section, it was a friend of mine, I hope he does not get mad for it. Again, thanks. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞02:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for cleaning up after me
Hi, I notice you've been judiciously adding protection tags to articles when I (often) neglect to do so after protecting an article. Much appreciated! But I must say, this seems like drudge work suited to a bot. There's a bot to remove the tags. Isn't there a bot that can auto-tag protected articles?
No, it isn't exist. Only DUMBot remove templates, but there's no bot for add them. Anyway, I have not problem with it, I've done it by months. Just one of the thing very few humans still doing here. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞04:35, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, there again. I've already made a few changes to the article for the 83rd Academy Awards. If you noticed, I've added information on the production ceremony including how AMPAS and ABC decided to give unprecedented access to interactive content for the ceremony. I also addede the international broadcasters.
I've removed several bits of information in the "Voting Trends and Summary" sections that I feel are unverifiable or are irrelevant to the article.
Hello Tbhotch! I have nominated the above song article for an FA (third time). Since you commented on the first nom, I thought I should let you know about the third nom. Fee free to comment or o/s. Thank you. Novice7 (talk) 03:17, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, do you know how many supports would an article need to pass? I'm thinking "Irresistible" would fail this time too :( Novice7 (talk) 04:05, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea, I think at least three with no objections. Anyway, what's the problem, the fourth, the fifth, the sixth... will always exist, and, someday, they'll get tired of you and you'll be blocked ;). Just kidding, they will pass it, they are not to mean to let an editor open the 99th archive. When the article is ready, it'll pass. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞04:10, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]