m →User:Archivesharer: better link |
Archivesharer (talk | contribs) →Reply re: legal, etc.: new section |
||
Line 80:
Your final warning has received a reply...good luck... <span style="font-size:smaller;font-family:'arial bold',sans-serif;border:1px solid Black;">[[User:N419BH|<span style="color:Black;background:#FFD700;">N419</span>]][[User talk:N419BH|<span style="background:Black;color:#FFD700;">BH</span>]]</span> 19:07, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
== Reply re: legal, etc. ==
**Reply:
I have not noticed a legal threat, nor was one intended from me. I do not threaten! Threats are empty; action is laudable.
There are already many legal cases moving through the courts. I do understand why.
Anyhow, the community apparently purports to be decent. It is indecent to use a subject's name that has not given permission in an editorial context which the community clearly does not understand. Their own feedback was more varied than the subject's matter of fact career, which the community is clearly unfamiliar with. This issue will go on for years, or until resolved. We have people at Columbia University, who know the subject well, now looking at it also. There are various people interested. How can subject's name be removed for privacy, not stricken?
Stricken in this case is not a viable option.
Please do not take offense. The goal is clear and known. Our community will have no relationship with your community once the matter is resolved. Until then, even if it takes twenty years or more, there will always be an ongoing issue. That is not a threat, I know the players involved -- it is a reality. Some of them are old Enquirer hands, and they know the business well. The National Enquirer was involved in the original defamation and libel lawsuits of our time. With all due respect, please advise so that we may put this to rest permanently. With appreciation, I await your kind thoughts.
|
Revision as of 19:11, 30 May 2012
This editor is an Illustrious Looshpah and is entitled to display this Book of All Knowledge. |
as Aerobird - Jul 2008-Apr 2010 - May 2010 - Jun 2010-Oct 2010 - Nov 2010-Dec 2010 - Jan 2011-Mar 2011 - Apr 2011-Sep 2011 - Oct 2011 - Nov 2011-Dec 2011 - Jan 2012-Feb 2012 - Mar 2012-Apr 2012 - Apr 2012- |
This page has archives. Sections older than 2 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Nikon Indy 300
Why is this out of date? This race has not been held since 2008. Are you confusing with Gold Coast 600? --Falcadore (talk) 01:11, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- Some of the tenses in the paragraph about the A1GP deal seemed imply "current" rather than "past", however upon re-reading it that might have just been my sleepiness, as it looks better now? I've removed the tag and added a link to the Gold Coast 600, which had been lacking. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:45, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
10 days semi-protection needed
- BRP Gregorio del Pilar (PF-15) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Hello BR, think you might have to semi-protect this article page against further mischief by an annoying anon (and nationalistic...) IP in reintroducing newsy content/text not suitable for Wikipedia. Thanks! --Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 13:06, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- I think there is a fair amount of consensus that relevant, notable information needs to be included in the article. Please review for yourself, but I don't see any "mischief" or "nationalistic" issues, other than possibly the removal of well referenced and noteworthy information from the article. Desk Ref (talk) 15:25, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- I think what we have here is a case of the six men of Indostan, to wit each was partly in the right / but all were in the wrong. The incident is worthy of mention in the ship article, however the amount of detail provided was excessive. I've trimmed it a bit. Also please note that Global Security is not necessarily a WP:RS. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:42, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- Noted, and Desk Ref seemed to be very knowledgable for a newbie with less than a 100 edits, eh? --Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 00:04, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- TB, thank you for your assistance on the article, you have been fair and helpful...and
- Dave...Darling, It's that way >>to WP:SPI, but on your way you really should stop by WP:Competence, and Dunning–Kruger effect. Now, it looks like I need to go find WP:AGF, as I seem to have recently misplaced it. Desk Ref (talk) 01:24, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- I think what we have here is a case of the six men of Indostan, to wit each was partly in the right / but all were in the wrong. The incident is worthy of mention in the ship article, however the amount of detail provided was excessive. I've trimmed it a bit. Also please note that Global Security is not necessarily a WP:RS. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:42, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- I think there is a fair amount of consensus that relevant, notable information needs to be included in the article. Please review for yourself, but I don't see any "mischief" or "nationalistic" issues, other than possibly the removal of well referenced and noteworthy information from the article. Desk Ref (talk) 15:25, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
If you're ever in Texas
Give me a heads up. :) I'll feed you some tacos! Benkenobi18 (talk) 21:34, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- "TACOS!!!" Heh, I'll keep that in mind, thanks! :) - The Bushranger One ping only 21:35, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Billy Bishop edit
Kinda a strange set of edits from an established and respected editor who obviously wanted to announce an event taking place in Ottawa. What was becoming apparent was that a pattern of "close paraphrasing" was occurring. Not sure what to do when there is a "regular" involved, as the templating the regulars is not appreciated (I know). FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:42, 27 May 2012 (UTC).
- I've dropped them a note. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:57, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Eddie Sharp
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Tia Norfleet
{{DYKbotdo 16:03, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Vanishing
- Question -- What is the proper code to be used in order to request on the various deletions on editors talk pages, etc.? I noticed somewhere in the WP guides that is possible to have a subjects name and references deleted from logs, if properly requested. Would you please advise how best to proceed in an efficient manner? Thank you for your time. Archivesharer (talk) 21:53, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- I believe what you're seeking is right to vanish - that page should explain it. :) - The Bushranger One ping only 22:46, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Am wondering about these edits
I really don't know, but this edit at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael de la Force puzzled me along with blanking a section of another editor's talkpage here. I guess they're doing a vanishing of sorts? Shearonink (talk) 22:55, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- It appears so - I've pointed them to WP:RTV above, and reverted the AfD edit. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, after I posted I see this is being addressed up above. I wasn't aware that one of the involved editors could NOINDEX & courtesy-vanish an AfD discussion-page & content on a user's talkpage, but that's cool. Learn something new all the time around here. Shearonink (talk) 23:02, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think they can, actually. I left the user talk page because, well, it's user talk - the user can revert it back or just remove the whole thing as they wish. But the AfD? That's a no-no. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:02, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah just saw this latest blanking in the edit history. Shearonink (talk) 23:05, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think they can, actually. I left the user talk page because, well, it's user talk - the user can revert it back or just remove the whole thing as they wish. But the AfD? That's a no-no. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:02, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, after I posted I see this is being addressed up above. I wasn't aware that one of the involved editors could NOINDEX & courtesy-vanish an AfD discussion-page & content on a user's talkpage, but that's cool. Learn something new all the time around here. Shearonink (talk) 23:02, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Can you please have a look at this conversation? It seems someone posted a hoax article, it was quickly nominated as CSD, but then a well-meaning editor took it to AFD instead, concerned that someone would remove the CSD tag (he did!). Can this AFD be speedily closed? - Ahunt (talk) 15:28, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- Looks like somebody else beat me to it. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:11, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Your final warning has received a reply...good luck... N419BH 19:07, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Reply re: legal, etc.
- Reply:
I have not noticed a legal threat, nor was one intended from me. I do not threaten! Threats are empty; action is laudable. There are already many legal cases moving through the courts. I do understand why.
Anyhow, the community apparently purports to be decent. It is indecent to use a subject's name that has not given permission in an editorial context which the community clearly does not understand. Their own feedback was more varied than the subject's matter of fact career, which the community is clearly unfamiliar with. This issue will go on for years, or until resolved. We have people at Columbia University, who know the subject well, now looking at it also. There are various people interested. How can subject's name be removed for privacy, not stricken? Stricken in this case is not a viable option. Please do not take offense. The goal is clear and known. Our community will have no relationship with your community once the matter is resolved. Until then, even if it takes twenty years or more, there will always be an ongoing issue. That is not a threat, I know the players involved -- it is a reality. Some of them are old Enquirer hands, and they know the business well. The National Enquirer was involved in the original defamation and libel lawsuits of our time. With all due respect, please advise so that we may put this to rest permanently. With appreciation, I await your kind thoughts.