The Rambling Man (talk | contribs) →Picking at your IBAN: no more edits here |
→Picking at your IBAN: Don't attack me and then tell me not to post, that's despicable. *Now* I'm done. |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
TRM, I've seen you making indirect comments directed at [[User:Medeis|Medeis]] lately. Here, three minutes after they posted [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Language&diff=prev&oldid=607823433 this], you added [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Language&diff=607823729&oldid=607823433 this] immediately below. I hope you're not going to tell me that was just a general comment and you didn't mean anybody in particular had been offering half-arsed opinions and pissing in the wind. At ITN, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates&diff=608577933&oldid=608576985 here], you removed Medeis' "Ready" mark and commented on their reasoning for it, immediately underneath. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=H._R._Giger&diff=next&oldid=608567799 Here], you reverted their removal of a section tag at [[H. R. Giger]]. On that one, I might possibly take it as an accidental interaction, but on the other two I really don't see it. As you know, per [[WP:IBAN]] you don't get to make reference to or comment on Medeis anywhere on Wikipedia, whether directly or indirectly, nor undo their edits to any page (whether by use of the revert function or by other means). Please be more careful and do not attempt to skirt the ban further, or I'll block you. And before you ask, yes, I'm serious. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 06:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC). |
TRM, I've seen you making indirect comments directed at [[User:Medeis|Medeis]] lately. Here, three minutes after they posted [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Language&diff=prev&oldid=607823433 this], you added [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Language&diff=607823729&oldid=607823433 this] immediately below. I hope you're not going to tell me that was just a general comment and you didn't mean anybody in particular had been offering half-arsed opinions and pissing in the wind. At ITN, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates&diff=608577933&oldid=608576985 here], you removed Medeis' "Ready" mark and commented on their reasoning for it, immediately underneath. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=H._R._Giger&diff=next&oldid=608567799 Here], you reverted their removal of a section tag at [[H. R. Giger]]. On that one, I might possibly take it as an accidental interaction, but on the other two I really don't see it. As you know, per [[WP:IBAN]] you don't get to make reference to or comment on Medeis anywhere on Wikipedia, whether directly or indirectly, nor undo their edits to any page (whether by use of the revert function or by other means). Please be more careful and do not attempt to skirt the ban further, or I'll block you. And before you ask, yes, I'm serious. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 06:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC). |
||
:Of course, you've warned her too, right, for her "indirect comments" directed clearly at me? No. Once again a perfect demonstration of your one-sided view of this. And sorry, she removed my edits on Giger first. Do me a favour, get someone else to do your edits here as I'm sick of your undying love and defence of her. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man#top|talk]]) 06:27, 16 May 2014 (UTC) |
:Of course, you've warned her too, right, for her "indirect comments" directed clearly at me? No. Once again a perfect demonstration of your one-sided view of this. And sorry, she removed my edits on Giger first. Do me a favour, get someone else to do your edits here as I'm sick of your undying love and defence of her. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man#top|talk]]) 06:27, 16 May 2014 (UTC) |
||
::If there are such edits by Medeis, why don't you tell me about them? I'd appreciate knowing these things. Vague allegations are less useful. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 06:48, 16 May 2014 (UTC). |
Revision as of 06:48, 16 May 2014
no archives yet (create) |
Hi TRM! I'm currently involved in a dispute with another user regarding whether ties in football-related tables are sorted chronologically or alphabetically. It's becoming really frustrating, with a ton of mudslinging here, on my TP and the article's TP. What is the past football community consensus on this (if any)? Cheers! —Bloom6132 (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Ref Desks
"Perhaps the Reference Desk should remember it's supposed to be a Reference Desk, not a chat board. That would avoid this kind of unpleasantness that's been going on for a year or more. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:03, 14 May 2014 (UTC)"
- To my certain knowledge, the Ref Desks have been harbours of discord and unpleasantness since at least 2006. --Dweller (talk) 09:01, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Fair point... ! The Rambling Man (talk) 09:16, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
A Trophy For You!
![]() |
WikiProject Good Articles March 2014 Backlog Drive Champion |
Congratulations! You reviewed the most articles (29 articles for a total of 181 points) during the March 2014 Backlog Drive! Thanks for your help! Dom497 (talk) 20:05, 15 May 2014 (UTC) |
- Cheers, it was a pleasure for a while, until one review went south. Perhaps that's why GAN is so backlogged, certain editors have no grace whatsoever. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:13, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
re:
That userbox is intended as a counter to this userbox and nothing more. My personal beliefs have no effect on how I work on the DYK project. I have no problem with other opinions and views in DYK hooks. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 22:41, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Picking at your IBAN
TRM, I've seen you making indirect comments directed at Medeis lately. Here, three minutes after they posted this, you added this immediately below. I hope you're not going to tell me that was just a general comment and you didn't mean anybody in particular had been offering half-arsed opinions and pissing in the wind. At ITN, here, you removed Medeis' "Ready" mark and commented on their reasoning for it, immediately underneath. Here, you reverted their removal of a section tag at H. R. Giger. On that one, I might possibly take it as an accidental interaction, but on the other two I really don't see it. As you know, per WP:IBAN you don't get to make reference to or comment on Medeis anywhere on Wikipedia, whether directly or indirectly, nor undo their edits to any page (whether by use of the revert function or by other means). Please be more careful and do not attempt to skirt the ban further, or I'll block you. And before you ask, yes, I'm serious. Bishonen | talk 06:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC).
- Of course, you've warned her too, right, for her "indirect comments" directed clearly at me? No. Once again a perfect demonstration of your one-sided view of this. And sorry, she removed my edits on Giger first. Do me a favour, get someone else to do your edits here as I'm sick of your undying love and defence of her. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:27, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- If there are such edits by Medeis, why don't you tell me about them? I'd appreciate knowing these things. Vague allegations are less useful. Bishonen | talk 06:48, 16 May 2014 (UTC).