Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Vanamonde93/Archive 39) (bot |
Vice regent (talk | contribs) →Moderation: new section |
||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
[[File:Internet-group-chat.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]Your feedback is requested  at [[Talk:George Washington#rfc_4BAD976|'''Talk:George Washington'''  on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment]]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of [[WP:FRS|Feedback Request Service]] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by [[WP:FRS|removing your name]].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by [[User:Yapperbot|Yapperbot]] :) | Is this wrong? Contact [[User talk:Naypta|my bot operator]]. | Sent at 23:30, 6 June 2021 (UTC) |
[[File:Internet-group-chat.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]Your feedback is requested  at [[Talk:George Washington#rfc_4BAD976|'''Talk:George Washington'''  on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment]]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of [[WP:FRS|Feedback Request Service]] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by [[WP:FRS|removing your name]].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by [[User:Yapperbot|Yapperbot]] :) | Is this wrong? Contact [[User talk:Naypta|my bot operator]]. | Sent at 23:30, 6 June 2021 (UTC) |
||
== Moderation == |
|||
Hey Vanamonde, |
|||
First I want to thank you sincerely for your immense effort to bring order to the MEK talk page. I was saddened to see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:People%27s_Mujahedin_of_Iran&diff=1027585626&oldid=1027584731 this comment]. It reminds me of what you said earlier at [[User talk:Vanamonde93/Archive 38#Feedback]] that I need to offer more compromise. Fwiw, I did take your advice; for example, after [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People%27s_Mujahedin_of_Iran&diff=1027445972&oldid=1027271131 you] and others called me out on replacing "Iraq" with "Saddam", I dropped the issue and pursued it no further. I would have made further "compromises to achieve a readable page" except most RfCs an discussions aren't trying to improve page readability, but instead trying to skew the POV one way or the other. I do [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:People%27s_Mujahedin_of_Iran&diff=1027274534&oldid=1027274304 keep restoring] this section [[Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran#Rough word count of each section]], which I believe holds the key to reducing page size, which you have repeatedly pointed out as a priority. I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:People%27s_Mujahedin_of_Iran&diff=1027274682&oldid=1027274534 recently pinged] Bahar to it in an attempt to "reach out to moderates on the other side". |
|||
I'm not saying all this to toot my own horn. I know I'm not a perfect editor and often make mistakes and lose my cool (that was partly why I asked you for feedback in Feb). But |
|||
rather I want to say that your frustrations have not fell on deaf ears. Your moderation was super helpful in moving the discussion forward and breaking the deadlock. So I hope you will reconsider about moderating future discussions (if not immediately than maybe later on). |
|||
Thanks once again for your hard work on the page, '''[[User:Vice regent|VR]]''' <sub>[[User talk:Vice regent|<b style="color:Black">talk</b>]]</sub> 08:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:24, 9 June 2021
Creation of page Ganesh Chandrasekaran
Creation of page which was recommended for deletion by you in 2018. The article is about the Indian musician Ganesh Chandrasekaran. I have gone through the references, he has worked on three films as music composer. There are more than enough articles and write ups about the artist to have a mention in Wikipedia. I recommend it for consideration so that we can develop the article.
- Hi, Vanamonde, I hope you are well! As you've probably seen, this is under discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion#Ganesh Chandrasekaran. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:26, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Justlettersandnumbers: Thanks for the note. I'm afraid I'm too busy in RL to investigate in detail right now; but I'd say that if there's any substantive material newer than the AfD, then an interested user should be given the chance to create this, and if they want to use the old draft as a starting point I don't see a procedural objection provided they are revamping it in userspace. If they fail to revamp it substantially, G4 would still apply, as I understand it; so we wouldn't waste much time. Vanamonde (Talk) 02:11, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Address the violation after warning, plz
Hi, I hope you're fine. I have reported a repeated violation here and would like to have your comment on that, if it's possible. --Mhhossein talk 18:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
DS 2021 Review Update
Dear Vanamonde93,
Thank you for participating in the recent discretionary sanctions community consultation. We are truly appreciative of the range of feedback we received and the high quality discussion which occurred during the process. We have now posted a summary of the feedback we've received and also a preview of some of what we expect to happen next. We hope that the second phase, a presentation of draft recommendations, will proceed on time in June or early July. You will be notified when this phase begins, unless you choose to to opt-out of future mailings by removing your name here.
--Barkeep49 & KevinL (aka L235) 21:05, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Internet-group-chat.svg/48px-Internet-group-chat.svg.png)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Windsor, Virginia on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Request the restoration of Patxi Xabier Lezama Perier
At some point, I noticed that Wikipedia's notability criteria (WP:ARTIST) says that a person is (likely) notable enough for an article if they are included in several museum collection.
The administrator SlimVirgin removed the page based on criteria (WP: ARTIST) and lack of reference from independent sources. This administrator has died and I cannot contact him.
Searching I found what the admin was requesting SlimVirgin, independent source reference and notability criteria (WP: ARTIST), see here: [1]. Those previous concerns are no longer a problem. In The Museum of Las Encartaciones you can find the work of this author included in the Cultural Heritage, Heritage Fund: Preserved Heritage.
Since Administrator SlimVirgin has died and protected the page, now I don't know who to turn to. Greetings and thanks.--Detoxtu (talk) 09:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, the latest deletion was performed by me, after this discussion. I cannot simply reverse the deletion, and given the socking that occurred there, I am not comfortable providing a userspace copy. If you genuinely have found fresh sources, I would suggest you write a new version, and send it to the articles for creation process. I would also suggest pinging the people who !voted "Delete" at AfD to have a look at your sources, because if you don't have new material, your draft is unlikely to get accepted. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Mail-message-new.svg/40px-Mail-message-new.svg.png)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Internet-group-chat.svg/48px-Internet-group-chat.svg.png)
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:In the news on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Invitation for Functionary consultation 2021
Greetings,
I'm letting you know in advance about a meeting I'd like to invite you to regarding the Universal Code of Conduct and the community's ownership of its future enforcement. I'm still in the process of putting together the details, but I wanted to share the date with you: 27 June, 2021. I do not have a time on this date yet, but I will let you soon. We have created a meta page with basic information. Please take a look at the meta page and sign up your name under the appropriate section.
Thank you for your time.--BAnand (WMF) 02:49, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production Edits
Hello- wanted to talk about the proposed edits to Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production -
WRAP audits are accepted by several major brands and retailers, including Walmart[1], Disney[2], Carhartt[3], and Costco[4]. In addition, several emerging brands such as Summersault[5] and Quince[6] utilize WRAP audits as part of their internal supply chain due diligence programs.
Information is sourced from CSR Pages of cited retailers or from independent publications. Would also like to update certification information using IRS form 990. None of the proposed cited content violates WP:SPS - none of the content is published by WRAP, nor is any content sourced from WRAP website. Open for discussion and proposed edits.
Agamemnon1701a (talk) 21:51, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, please continue this discussion on the article talk page. Vanamonde (Talk) 01:03, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Walmart Due Diligence Policies" (PDF).
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "Disney ILS Manual" (PDF).
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "Carhartt Corporate Social Responsibility".
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "Costco Supplier Code of Conduct".
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "35 Ethical & Sustainable Clothing Brands Betting Against Fast Fashion". The Good Trade. Retrieved 2021-05-27.
- ^ "Quince Performance Legging Are $30 But Should Cost Triple". Well+Good. 2021-05-02. Retrieved 2021-05-27.
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Internet-group-chat.svg/48px-Internet-group-chat.svg.png)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:George Washington on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Moderation
Hey Vanamonde,
First I want to thank you sincerely for your immense effort to bring order to the MEK talk page. I was saddened to see this comment. It reminds me of what you said earlier at User talk:Vanamonde93/Archive 38#Feedback that I need to offer more compromise. Fwiw, I did take your advice; for example, after you and others called me out on replacing "Iraq" with "Saddam", I dropped the issue and pursued it no further. I would have made further "compromises to achieve a readable page" except most RfCs an discussions aren't trying to improve page readability, but instead trying to skew the POV one way or the other. I do keep restoring this section Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran#Rough word count of each section, which I believe holds the key to reducing page size, which you have repeatedly pointed out as a priority. I recently pinged Bahar to it in an attempt to "reach out to moderates on the other side".
I'm not saying all this to toot my own horn. I know I'm not a perfect editor and often make mistakes and lose my cool (that was partly why I asked you for feedback in Feb). But rather I want to say that your frustrations have not fell on deaf ears. Your moderation was super helpful in moving the discussion forward and breaking the deadlock. So I hope you will reconsider about moderating future discussions (if not immediately than maybe later on).
Thanks once again for your hard work on the page, VR talk 08:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC)