Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::Honestly Xeno, it's not about breaking my word. It's about the desire to refrain from arguments and heated discussion. It's also about the desire to discuss things in an enviornment that hasn't been poisoned by a certain user's epicaricacy. I'm suggesting that route because I believe that that is what would be most effective. I understand that RfCs are typically closed after 30 days. Would it be proper to wait until it is closed?[[User:Mk5384|Mk5384]] ([[User talk:Mk5384|talk]]) 08:38, 30 June 2010 (UTC) |
::Honestly Xeno, it's not about breaking my word. It's about the desire to refrain from arguments and heated discussion. It's also about the desire to discuss things in an enviornment that hasn't been poisoned by a certain user's epicaricacy. I'm suggesting that route because I believe that that is what would be most effective. I understand that RfCs are typically closed after 30 days. Would it be proper to wait until it is closed?[[User:Mk5384|Mk5384]] ([[User talk:Mk5384|talk]]) 08:38, 30 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::Perhaps I'll just let it go. As long as OberRanks avoids me after the RfC is closed it may be better to just move on. I'd still like your opinion, just in case I change my mind. My concern, judging by his past behaviour, that he's not going to avoid me. In that case, I think it would be helpful to have cited examples of his lies and harassment.[[User:Mk5384|Mk5384]] ([[User talk:Mk5384|talk]]) 08:54, 30 June 2010 (UTC) |
:::Perhaps I'll just let it go. As long as OberRanks avoids me after the RfC is closed it may be better to just move on. I'd still like your opinion, just in case I change my mind. My concern, judging by his past behaviour, that he's not going to avoid me. In that case, I think it would be helpful to have cited examples of his lies and harassment.[[User:Mk5384|Mk5384]] ([[User talk:Mk5384|talk]]) 08:54, 30 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
::::One more question. Suppose I did read the RfC. Suppose OberRanks lied about me in the RfC itself, and I could show that? What would happen as a result of that?[[User:Mk5384|Mk5384]] ([[User talk:Mk5384|talk]]) 09:54, 30 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
==Thanks== |
==Thanks== |
Revision as of 09:54, 30 June 2010
userpage | talk | dashboard | misc |
|
|
|
Your proposal re Diego Grez edit restrictions enacted
Per community consensus on AN, I have enacted the proposal that you made, and notified Diego and HJ Mitchell. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 18:02, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I think the listing at WP:RESTRICT probably needs tweaking. I'm not sure if that first bit is even still in effect. –xenotalk 18:04, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
MK
I wanted to get your advice about something. I said that I would not participate in the RFC, and I stand by it. I also said that I would not read it, which I will not. However, as OberRanks has a separate user account, the majority of which was devoted to the RFC he wanted to file, I'm sure I've seen the better part of what it contains. (Although he was admonished by Sarek for adding to it after it was certified, so I can only imagine what else it contains.) As I have said, the only reason I have refused to participate is because of who filed it. It was filed with the intention of being able to continue to harass me. Perhaps I have given the wrong impression, as I am, indeed interested in what others have to say. I won't get involved with the RFC for reasons I stated, plus the fact that I have no desire to go back and forth with OberRanks. (As you know, I have already proposed an interaction ban between myself and this user.) I would like for members of the community to have the opportunity to opine on my time here at Wikipedia. I would also like to tell my side of a few different stories in an enviornment that is not hostile, or prejudiced. Would it be appropriate for me to create a page (it's far too much to do it on my talk page) where I can explain several incidents that took place, provide examples of numerous other editors with whom I've worked harmoniously, provide numerous examples of situations where I've admitted to being in the wrong/and or apologised, provide numerous examples where I've compromised or walked away completely rather than edit war, and finally, provide numerous examples of both lies OberRanks has told about me, as well as examples of inappropriate behaviour on his part? Thank you in advance for your time. All the best-Mk5384 (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- I suppose you could, but I think it would be far more effective to simply write a response at the RFC, even if that means breaking your word not to look at it. –xenotalk 22:33, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Honestly Xeno, it's not about breaking my word. It's about the desire to refrain from arguments and heated discussion. It's also about the desire to discuss things in an enviornment that hasn't been poisoned by a certain user's epicaricacy. I'm suggesting that route because I believe that that is what would be most effective. I understand that RfCs are typically closed after 30 days. Would it be proper to wait until it is closed?Mk5384 (talk) 08:38, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps I'll just let it go. As long as OberRanks avoids me after the RfC is closed it may be better to just move on. I'd still like your opinion, just in case I change my mind. My concern, judging by his past behaviour, that he's not going to avoid me. In that case, I think it would be helpful to have cited examples of his lies and harassment.Mk5384 (talk) 08:54, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- Honestly Xeno, it's not about breaking my word. It's about the desire to refrain from arguments and heated discussion. It's also about the desire to discuss things in an enviornment that hasn't been poisoned by a certain user's epicaricacy. I'm suggesting that route because I believe that that is what would be most effective. I understand that RfCs are typically closed after 30 days. Would it be proper to wait until it is closed?Mk5384 (talk) 08:38, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for actioning my username/usurpation request. Much appreciated. Everton Dasent (talk) 23:00, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you.
I lubz you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.129.194 (talk) 23:04, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Sure thing; but I would be remiss if I didn't point you in the direction of the guidelines on canvassing. –xenotalk 23:06, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
I did three. Just a weedle. Should I go and be all honorable and contact three of the inclusionists? (say "nah" please.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.129.194 (talk) 23:09, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Request for help
Hi Xeno,
Would you please look at this JS script (and its history) for tweaking the url to work for everyone and not just those using the secure server. I'm trying to meet with this request for an articlespace-only watchlist control. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 03:29, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Please to be starting a page for me
Gertrude friedberg. She has a de.wiki page although she was a New Yorker. That page has references including her NYT obituary. She had one SF minor classic from the 60s and was a playright in the 40s.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gertrude_Friedberg
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/09/20/obituaries/gertrude-t-friedberg-playwright-81.html?pagewanted=1
She has at least one redlink in a list type thing on Wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.129.194 (talk) 04:42, 30 June 2010 (UTC)