ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 5 discussions to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure/Archive 17. (BOT) |
AlbinoFerret (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
====[[Talk:Kenji Miyazawa#RfC: Membership in Kokuchūkai and reference to it]]==== |
====[[Talk:Kenji Miyazawa#RfC: Membership in Kokuchūkai and reference to it]]==== |
||
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at [[Talk:Kenji Miyazawa#RfC: Membership in Kokuchūkai and reference to it]] {{Initiated|28 February 2015}}? Thanks, [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC) |
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at [[Talk:Kenji Miyazawa#RfC: Membership in Kokuchūkai and reference to it]] {{Initiated|28 February 2015|done=yes}}? Thanks, [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
{{done}} [[User:AlbinoFerret|<span style="color:white; background-color:#534545; font-weight: bold; font-size: 93%;">AlbinoFerret</span>]] 13:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC) |
|||
====[[Talk:Tyson Fury#RfC: How should Fury's nationality be described?]]==== |
====[[Talk:Tyson Fury#RfC: How should Fury's nationality be described?]]==== |
Revision as of 13:15, 15 April 2015
The Requests for closure noticeboard is for posting requests to have an uninvolved editor assess, summarize, and formally close a discussion on Wikipedia. Formal closure by an uninvolved editor or administrator should be requested where consensus remains unclear, where the issue is a contentious one, or where there are wiki-wide implications.
Many discussions do not need formal closure and do not need to be listed here.
Many discussions result in a reasonably clear consensus, so if the consensus is clear, any editor—even one involved in the discussion—may close the discussion. The default length of a formal request for closure is 30 days (opened on or before 27 May 2024); if consensus becomes clear before that and discussion has slowed, then it may be closed early. However, editors usually wait at least a week after an RfC opens, unless the outcome is very obvious, so that there is enough time for a full discussion.
If consensus is unclear, then post a neutral request here for assistance.
Please ensure that your request for a close is brief and neutrally worded. Please include a link to the discussion. Do not use this board to continue the discussion in question. Be prepared to wait for someone to review the discussion. If you disagree with a particular closure, do not dispute it here. You can start discussion at the original page or request a Closure review at Administrators' noticeboard with a link to the discussion page and the policy-based reason you believe the closure should be overturned. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Closure review archive for previous closure reviews.
Any uninvolved editor may close most discussions, so long as they are prepared to discuss and justify their closing rationale.
Because requests for closure made here are often those that are the most contentious, closing these discussions can be a significant responsibility. Closers should be familiar with all policies and guidelines that could apply to the given discussion. All closers should be prepared to fully discuss the closure rationale with any editors who have questions about the closure or the underlying policies, and to provide advice about where to discuss any remaining concerns that those editors may have.
A request for comment discussed how to appeal closures and whether an administrator can summarily overturn a non-administrator's closure. The consensus was that closures should not be reverted solely because the closer was not an administrator. However, special considerations apply for articles for deletion and move discussions—see Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions and Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions for details.
Once a discussion listed on this page has been closed, please add {{Close}} or {{Done}} and a note to the request here, after which the request will be archived.
Requests for closure
XfD
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 April 2
Seven discussions need to be closed. Every one of these discussions has been going on for three weeks or more. Paperpencils (talk) 18:45, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 January 8
Seven discussions still open. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 05:35, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Down to five now. --BDD (talk) 19:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- Now down to three. SD0001 (talk) 10:30, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- Down to one. --QEDK ♠ T ♥ C 14:48, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 April 1#Template:Violence against Muslims in India
Request for closure. --AmritasyaPutraT 11:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
CfD backlog
There are currently many open discussions, including some going all the way back to December. Please see the list at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion#Discussions_awaiting_closure. - jc37 17:44, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 March 20#Plowback retained earnings
Can an uninvolved administrator take a look at this one? It was originally opened on Feburary 19, but was the subject of a deletion review and was overturned as relist on March 19. (Initiated 3415 days ago on 19 February 2015) Natg 19 (talk) 20:39, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:2 May 2014 Odessa clashes#Requested move 3 March 2015
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2 May 2014 Odessa clashes#Requested move 3 March 2015 (Initiated 3403 days ago on 3 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 19:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Korean American#Requested move 11 March 2015
Requesting closure on Talk:Korean_American#Requested_move_11_March_2015. (Initiated 3395 days ago on 11 March 2015). EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 18:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
As-yet untitled possible Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton move discussion
Pursuant to the discussion currently being held at the Village Pump, if there is determined to be a consensus that another move discussion is permissible with respect to Hillary Rodham Clinton, such a discussion will likely be initiated sometime within the next several weeks. As with the previous effort on this matter, it is requested that a three-admin panel be convened to determine the consensus of the community in this discussion. Such a panel should be composed of three administrators who are experienced in closing RMs, and who are uninvolved with article at issue, and have not previously participated in these discussions. The panel members would be expected to monitor the discussion and enforce civility and protocol, and close it at the end of the allotted discussion period. In light of the last experience, it would also be appreciated if the panel members were to make sure to be available to close the discussion and make a determination of consensus quickly. bd2412 T 04:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Requests for comment
Talk:Brisbane Roar FC#RfC: What does the F in Brisbane Roar FC stand for?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Brisbane Roar FC#RfC: What does the F in Brisbane Roar FC stand for? (Initiated 3433 days ago on 1 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 19:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters#Exceptions to Small Caps
An admin is requested to close this RfC about whether there should be certain exceptions for the MOS's general prohibition of the use of smallcaps, exceptions to accommodate specific usages and WP:CITEVAR. -- Diannaa (talk) 03:10, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Max Verstappen
Could an uninvolved administrator assess the consensus in the following four closely related discussions on the above page:
Nationality: official rules according the FIA International Sporting Code
Thanks in advance, Tvx1 21:38, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Template talk:Largest cities of Israel#RfC on Jerusalem
This RfC was open for 6 weeks, and saw no activitiy in the last 3 weeks (except a long discussion between me and GregKaye which in my opinion has no direct bearing on the question in the RfC). Can someone neutral please assess whether a consensus was reached and if so - what it is. Thanks, “WarKosign” 20:57, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Can I please ask any admin involve to note that the RfC started in he context that the content started with an in template title "largest urban areas of Israel. "Urban areas" reverted to "cities" and "of" was changed to "in"? The topic of this RfC also relates to the topic of a parallel RfC located at Talk:List of cities in Israel#RfC best resolution of title and content and I think that it would make sense for both RfCs to be handled together. I also think that it would be of great help if a truly neutral editor who has sufficient interest in the topic area take this on as, IMO, it is a fairly involved topic. GregKaye 21:46, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
WP:ANI#Dicklyon and mass moves
Would an administrator please deal with this thread? Much obliged. RGloucester — ☎ 20:02, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Gun show loophole#Merger proposal to Universal background check (6 April 2015)
Would an uninvolved admin close this, please? Discussion died April 7. Thanks. Lightbreather (talk) 23:10, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Bob Simon#Christians in the Holy Land
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bob Simon#Christians in the Holy Land (Initiated 3422 days ago on 12 February 2015)? See the subsection Talk:Bob Simon#RfC: Should the controversey over the Christians in the Holy Land story be included in the article?. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Roy Moore#Non-notable Play?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Roy Moore#Non-notable Play? (Initiated 3420 days ago on 14 February 2015)? The opening poster wrote:
There's a section called Judge Roy Moore is Coming to Dinner about a play which is a parody of Judge Roy Moore. If it is notable it should probably have it's own page as the play does not feature him at all. However, there's limited WP:SOURCES on this and the play's creator. Seems like WP:FRINGE ...
Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Breda O'Brien#RfC
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Breda O'Brien#RfC (Initiated 3414 days ago on 20 February 2015)? The opening poster wrote:
Should the lead include the sentence from the body of the article:
- ... and to same-sex marriage, but does not now oppose civil partnership.[6][7]
Or should the lead remain simply:
- O'Brien opposes same-sex marriage.
Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Walter O'Brien#RfC: Founding date of Scorpion Computer Services?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Walter O'Brien#RfC: Founding date of Scorpion Computer Services? (Initiated 3411 days ago on 23 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Kenji Miyazawa#RfC: Membership in Kokuchūkai and reference to it
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kenji Miyazawa#RfC: Membership in Kokuchūkai and reference to it (Initiated 3406 days ago on 28 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Done AlbinoFerret 13:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Tyson Fury#RfC: How should Fury's nationality be described?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Tyson Fury#RfC: How should Fury's nationality be described? (Initiated 3389 days ago on 17 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Project for the New American Century#RfC
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Project for the New American Century#RfC (Initiated 3408 days ago on 26 February 2015)? The opening poster wrote:
[1] removes a second quote from a source still being used for the statement: British MP Michael Meacher, made similar allegations in 2003, stating that Rebuilding America's Defences was "a blueprint for the creation of a global Pax Americana," which had been "drawn up for" key members of the Bush administration
The material removed further cites Meacher specifically for
- it is clear the US authorities did little or nothing to pre-empt the events of 9/11. It is known that at least 11 countries provided advance warning to the US of the 9/11 attacks. Two senior Mossad experts were sent to Washington in August 2001 to alert the CIA and FBI to a cell of 200 terrorists said to be preparing a big operation (Daily Telegraph, September 16 2001). The list they provided included the names of four of the 9/11 hijackers, none of whom was arrested.
Was the second quote properly removed as UNDUE or should it remain per NPOV? 21:57, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:RFC I am offering an alternative statement here since I do not believe the above is an accurate reflection of the question being debated. Alternative statement would be:
Is the lengthy quote necessary, or was it rightly removed as part of a broader effort to reduce the number of block quotes in the article? Is it necessary for Meacher's views on September 11 to be quoted at length in this section, or should his views be summarized/paraphrased (with appropriate citations) instead?
Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Acharya S#RfC: should the result of previous RFC be restored?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Acharya S#RfC: should the result of previous RFC be restored? (Initiated 3406 days ago on 28 February 2015)? The opening poster wrote:
Should the result of previous RFC Talk:Acharya_S/Archive_12#Request_for_comment be restored? See above comment User:Rjd0060 "As for which version was protected, I'm sure I protected The Wrong Version. My apologies, but per PPOL and administrative procedures, we typically must stay completely neutral in the case and protect the article in the current state, rather than a preferred state".
Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Acharya S#RfC: should content from Maurice Casey be included in the article?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Acharya S#RfC: should content from Maurice Casey be included in the article? (Initiated 3405 days ago on 1 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg#RfC: What level of discussion of the plagiarism scandal should be included in Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg#RfC: What level of discussion of the plagiarism scandal should be included in Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg? (Initiated 3404 days ago on 2 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Neo-feudalism#RfC: Is anarcho-capitalism a neo-reactionary idea?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Neo-feudalism#RfC: Is anarcho-capitalism a neo-reactionary idea? (Initiated 3423 days ago on 11 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:United States#No consensus to revert to out of date, inaccurate 2009 descriptions of 2008 recession (RFC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:United States#No consensus to revert to out of date, inaccurate 2009 descriptions of 2008 recession (RFC) (Initiated 3405 days ago on 1 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Billy Mackenzie#RfC: Inclusion of a fan sourced playlist of Billy Mackensie's work linked to a second skin music steam system enriches Wikipedia's digital vellum. Please see following discussion / dispute
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Billy Mackenzie#RfC: Inclusion of a fan sourced playlist of Billy Mackensie's work linked to a second skin music steam system enriches Wikipedia's digital vellum. Please see following discussion / dispute (Initiated 3421 days ago on 13 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Israel#RfC - what should the lead say about the initial borders of Israel
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Israel#RfC - what should the lead say about the initial borders of Israel (Initiated 3420 days ago on 14 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:North Bergen, New Jersey#RfC: Should the parent and child category both be added to this article?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:North Bergen, New Jersey#RfC: Should the parent and child category both be added to this article? (Initiated 3418 days ago on 16 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization#RfC on Steve Haas' recent article
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization#RfC on Steve Haas' recent article (Initiated 3415 days ago on 19 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Supersessionism#RFC on pertinence of the land promise to supersession, in Protestant views
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Supersessionism#RFC on pertinence of the land promise to supersession, in Protestant views (Initiated 3396 days ago on 10 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Afro#RfC: Is the information about the Circassian beauties relevant?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Afro#RfC: Is the information about the Circassian beauties relevant? (Initiated 3414 days ago on 20 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Carmel, Har Hebron#RfC for 2nd picture and two quotes
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Carmel, Har Hebron#RfC for 2nd picture and two quotes (Initiated 3412 days ago on 22 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Winged unicorn#Alicorn
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Winged unicorn#Alicorn (Initiated 3411 days ago on 23 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Morisco#RfC: Should the Expulsion section state as fact that "Moriscos...were overwhelmingly the descendants of...native Iberians"?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Morisco#RfC: Should the Expulsion section state as fact that "Moriscos...were overwhelmingly the descendants of...native Iberians"? (Initiated 3406 days ago on 28 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:2015 University of Oklahoma Sigma Alpha Epsilon racism incident#RfC: Should the language of this article be softened?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2015 University of Oklahoma Sigma Alpha Epsilon racism incident#RfC: Should the language of this article be softened? (Initiated 3390 days ago on 16 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Discrimination#Propose widening the topic area of "Racism in ..." articles through moves to "Racism and prejudice in ..." or "Discrimination and racism in" titles
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Discrimination#Propose widening the topic area of "Racism in ..." articles through moves to "Racism and prejudice in ..." or "Discrimination and racism in" titles (Initiated 3398 days ago on 8 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown#RFC : How should the DOJ report be summarized.
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown#RFC : How should the DOJ report be summarized. (Initiated 3400 days ago on 6 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:António de Oliveira Salazar#Is the António de Oliveira Salazar article seriously out of balance and violating neutral point of view (NPOV) policy?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:António de Oliveira Salazar#Is the António de Oliveira Salazar article seriously out of balance and violating neutral point of view (NPOV) policy? (Initiated 3400 days ago on 6 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:List of cities in Israel#RfC best resolution of title and content
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of cities in Israel#RfC best resolution of title and content (Initiated 3401 days ago on 5 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Christina, Queen of Sweden#RfC: Should a cited source include what the article has where the citation appears in its text?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Christina, Queen of Sweden#RfC: Should a cited source include what the article has where the citation appears in its text? (Initiated 3397 days ago on 9 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant/Archive 33#RfC: What content should be used in the "Ideologies" section of the ISIL infobox?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant/Archive 33#RfC: What content should be used in the "Ideologies" section of the ISIL infobox? (Initiated 3392 days ago on 14 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:History of Scotland#RFC
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:History of Scotland#RFC (Initiated 3395 days ago on 11 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:William Street (Manhattan)#Lede image dispute
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:William Street (Manhattan)#Lede image dispute (Initiated 3393 days ago on 13 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Littleton, Colorado#Request for comment: Historical reference to the 1999 Columbine shootings
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Littleton, Colorado#Request for comment: Historical reference to the 1999 Columbine shootings (Initiated 3393 days ago on 13 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Bitcoin/Archive 25#RfC : Is my presentation of the quoted source more relevant to the Ponzi scheme dispute section?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bitcoin/Archive 25#RfC : Is my presentation of the quoted source more relevant to the Ponzi scheme dispute section? (Initiated 3422 days ago on 12 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Ken Ham#Rfc Edit specifying 'dinosaur soft tissue, cellular structures, various proteins and evidence of DNA fragments'
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ken Ham#Rfc Edit specifying 'dinosaur soft tissue, cellular structures, various proteins and evidence of DNA fragments' (Initiated 3421 days ago on 13 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters#Try again for "Universe/universe" consensus?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters#Try again for "Universe/universe" consensus? (Initiated 3394 days ago on 12 March 2015)? Please consider Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters/Archive 16#Capitalization of universe - request for comment, closed 4 March 2015, in your close. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Safety of electronic cigarettes#RFC: Are medical statements such as those from the World Lung Foundation reliable for medical content?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Safety of electronic cigarettes#RFC: Are medical statements such as those from the World Lung Foundation reliable for medical content? (Initiated 3415 days ago on 19 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Lloviu virus#RfC
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Lloviu virus#RfC (Initiated 3414 days ago on 20 February 2015)? The opening poster wrote: "Should this article be redirected to Cuevavirus?" Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Einstein Cross#This needs to be renamed to the quaser
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Einstein Cross#This needs to be renamed to the quaser (Initiated 3398 days ago on 8 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:List of Robot Chicken episodes#Replace with summary, or merge?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of Robot Chicken episodes#Replace with summary, or merge? (Initiated 3424 days ago on 10 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Glengarry Glen Ross (film)#RfC: Is there enough evidence that the film is set in New York City?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Glengarry Glen Ross (film)#RfC: Is there enough evidence that the film is set in New York City? (Initiated 3417 days ago on 17 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Prometheus (2012 film)#RfC: Multiple announcements for sequel of production progress and release dates for Prometheus 2
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Prometheus (2012 film)#RfC: Multiple announcements for sequel of production progress and release dates for Prometheus 2 (Initiated 3398 days ago on 8 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Remember (The Walking Dead)#RFC: Can the plot summary contain a separate/block quote?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Remember (The Walking Dead)#RFC: Can the plot summary contain a separate/block quote? (Initiated 3402 days ago on 4 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Taylor Swift#RfC: Which image for the infobox is best?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Taylor Swift#RfC: Which image for the infobox is best? (Initiated 3392 days ago on 14 March 2015)? The discussion is split between images 1 and 2, so a close by an uninvolved editor would be helpful. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:2015 Copenhagen shootings#Picture should be removed
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2015 Copenhagen shootings#Picture should be removed (Initiated 3419 days ago on 15 February 2015)? See the subsection Talk:2015 Copenhagen shootings#Request for comment. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Institute of Economic Affairs#RfC: How should the funding section be presented?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Institute of Economic Affairs#RfC: How should the funding section be presented? (Initiated 3391 days ago on 15 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Philadelphia Fire Department#Line of duty deaths
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Philadelphia Fire Department#Line of duty deaths (Initiated 3396 days ago on 10 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Proposed changes to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Contentious labels
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Proposed changes to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Contentious labels (Initiated 3394 days ago on 12 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Army Ranger Wing#Unit size RFC
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Army Ranger Wing#Unit size RFC (Initiated 3398 days ago on 8 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Kokuchūkai#RFC: Keep previously referenced sources or remove them
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kokuchūkai#RFC: Keep previously referenced sources or remove them (Initiated 3399 days ago on 7 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Arab Spring#Proposed merge with Arab Winter
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Arab Spring#Proposed merge with Arab Winter (Initiated 3401 days ago on 5 March 2015)? Please consider Talk:Arab Winter#Merge to Arab spring (Initiated 12 October 2014) in your close. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian politics#RfC addressing the inclusion of minor parties in Australian election article infoboxes
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian politics#RfC addressing the inclusion of minor parties in Australian election article infoboxes (Initiated 3403 days ago on 3 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Dorje Shugden controversy#RfC: Should the lead include accusations of demonstrators?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Dorje Shugden controversy#RfC: Should the lead include accusations of demonstrators? (Initiated 3404 days ago on 2 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Democratic Party (United States)#RFC re Democratic Party "All of the Above" Energy Policy
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Democratic Party (United States)#RFC re Democratic Party "All of the Above" Energy Policy (Initiated 3406 days ago on 28 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Hinduism/Archive 30#R f c : Should we revert to a former version?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Hinduism/Archive 30#R f c : Should we revert to a former version? (Initiated 3398 days ago on 8 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:New Kadampa Tradition#Should the Intro in the Third Paragraph be fixed??
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:New Kadampa Tradition#Should the Intro in the Third Paragraph be fixed?? (Initiated 3386 days ago on 20 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Gender variance#Definition: "Males and females" in the lead vs. being ambiguous
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Gender variance#Definition: "Males and females" in the lead vs. being ambiguous (Initiated 3414 days ago on 20 February 2015)? See the subsection Talk:Gender variance#RfC: Should "males and females" and/or "masculine and feminine" be used in the lead?. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Multi-sport events#Separate Beach volleyball at the 2014 Asian Games
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Multi-sport events#Separate Beach volleyball at the 2014 Asian Games (Initiated 3476 days ago on 20 December 2014)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Splitting up the MfD
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Splitting up the MfD (Initiated 3412 days ago on 22 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#Proposal
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#Proposal (Initiated 3398 days ago on 8 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline#Census-designated places
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline#Census-designated places (Initiated 3421 days ago on 13 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Harassment#WP: OUTEX
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Harassment#WP: OUTEX (Initiated 3408 days ago on 26 February 2015)? See the subsection Wikipedia talk:Harassment#RfC: Links related to paid editing. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Notability#Reliability vs. bias
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Notability#Reliability vs. bias (Initiated 3424 days ago on 10 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking#RfC - Nested links
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking#RfC - Nested links (Initiated 3392 days ago on 14 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Template talk:Nihongo#RFC February 9, 2015
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Nihongo#RFC February 9, 2015 (Initiated 3424 days ago on 10 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Christian terrorism#RfC
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Christian terrorism#RfC (Initiated 3423 days ago on 11 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Greek–Turkish relations#RFC: Should this article be re-titled Greece-Turkey relations?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Greek–Turkish relations#RFC: Should this article be re-titled Greece-Turkey relations? (Initiated 3421 days ago on 13 February 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Closed it. SamuelDay1 (talk) 02:43, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Help talk:Referencing for beginners#RfC: What method first
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Help talk:Referencing for beginners#RfC: What method first (Initiated 3393 days ago on 13 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Fire engine#Merge discussion
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Fire engine#Merge discussion (Initiated 3382 days ago on 24 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Fire engine#Cleaning up the page!!!
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Fire engine#Cleaning up the page!!! (Initiated 3398 days ago on 8 March 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)