(talk page) (0/7/1); Scheduled to end 20:06, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Nomination
Cprice1000 (talk · contribs) – YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER Cprice1000talk2me 04:53, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: I think my contributions to music, such as my articles for Sky Ferreira and my currently incubated Britney Spears articles are my greatest works.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: Yeah, both of them. I get really upset when someone does something I disagree with and I will typically leave a note on their talk page or on the article page about why I disagree with what they are saying.
General comments
- Links for Cprice1000: Cprice1000 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Cprice1000 can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
Discussion
- Cprice is an amazing editor, who is very precise, and has made many amazing contributions to Wikipedia. He is on vandalism very quickly. If you guys decide to make him an administrator, you will not regret it. The amount of work and time he puts into making Wikipedia a better place is just downright great. ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT 06:01, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Since i have joined Wikipedia, Cprice has most of the time been guiding me and trust me, guidance and from a practically flawless editor like Cprice has encouraged me to edit more pages on Wikipedia in the appropriate way. Cprice deserves to be an admin. I am sure of his wonderful capabilities and efficiency. Jivesh • Talk2Me 06:44, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Support
Oppose
- OpposeUhm, sorry, but you only have 1000 edits in about 4 months. Sorry. Tofutwitch11 (TALK) 20:08, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose, similar to the editor above Cprice only has 1082 edits. The range of edits is not sufficient enough to demonstrate that the editor has enough experience or understanding of wikipedia rules. Although I will concur that he/she has made some good edits I don't think you are quite ready. Apologies. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 20:12, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I have to oppose at this time. As the above two editors mentioned, a thousand edits and just four months of experience is hardly enough to have a broad scope of experience and trust in the community to become an admin. Also, your short answers to the three questions hardly meet RfA "standards". Also, you say you want to work in AIV but you barely have any anti-vandalism edits. Overall, I think you'd be a great admin in time, but you need much more experience. -download ׀ sign! 20:19, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:NOTNOW. Very short, terse and (IMO) uninformative answers to the most basic questions every RfA is asked to answer, editing experience is insufficent both in quantity and variety. Nothing indicates an understanding of the Admin's job or demonstrates the judgment required to perform that job. Put in another six to nine months working on countervandalism, new page patrolling and at least some gnomish article editing, then file another RfA. I don't think an Admin needs a half dozen featured articles, or even good ones, that they've authored themselves, but I do think they need to have some foundation in positive contribution to content. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 20:35, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose. That Cprice1000 apparently believes there is even the slightest of chances that this RfA will succeed speaks volumes. Malleus Fatuorum 20:44, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Snowball in hell - Sorry, but your answers to the questions do not even convey to me that you are just eager to help, but requesting adminship too soon. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:54, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Just kill it already. Candidate doesn't even care to write a statement. -- Lord Roem (talk) 21:02, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Is inexperience any reason to be rude? Last time I checked it was the opposite. Ironholds (talk) 21:05, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Its not inexperience. Rather, its a lack of even writing explainations why the candidate wants to be an admin or writing some introduction. Quality over quantity but good nominations can't omit well-thought out answers. -- Lord Roem (talk) 21:07, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Neutral
- Neutral to avoid pile-on. Broaden your experience here, and come back in a year or so, and I'll be happy to support. The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 21:08, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- How do you know that you'll be happy to support in a year or so? Doesn't that somewhat depend on what the candidate does in the interim? Malleus Fatuorum 21:10, 1 January 2011 (UTC)