Content deleted Content added
VanishedUser sdu8asdasd (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
→Comments by other users: This nomination is in breach of Wikipedia policy Wikipedia:Assume good faith |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:Anyone who disagrees with you is a sockpuppet aren't they?--[[User:Toddy1|Toddy1]] ([[User talk:Toddy1|talk]]) 08:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
:Anyone who disagrees with you is a sockpuppet aren't they?--[[User:Toddy1|Toddy1]] ([[User talk:Toddy1|talk]]) 08:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
:*Toddy1, if you've got absolutely nothing constructive to say, then don't waste everyone else's time by commenting. If you really can't stop yourself, at least bother to look where you should place it. JoshuSasori is a CBANNED sockmaster, so '''every potential sock''' needs investigating, to either exonerate them, or prove their guilt. [[User:Lukeno94|<font color="Navy">Luke</font><font color="FireBrick">no</font><font color="Green">94</font>]] [[User talk:Lukeno94#top|<i>(tell Luke off here)</i>]] 08:20, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
:*Toddy1, if you've got absolutely nothing constructive to say, then don't waste everyone else's time by commenting. If you really can't stop yourself, at least bother to look where you should place it. JoshuSasori is a CBANNED sockmaster, so '''every potential sock''' needs investigating, to either exonerate them, or prove their guilt. [[User:Lukeno94|<font color="Navy">Luke</font><font color="FireBrick">no</font><font color="Green">94</font>]] [[User talk:Lukeno94#top|<i>(tell Luke off here)</i>]] 08:20, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
::*The editor has made one edit to Wikipedia. There is absolutely no evidence that he/she is a sock of anyone. Or if there is, where is it? Wikipedia has a policy of [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith]]. It is a breach of that policy to assume that anyone who disagrees with you is a sock puppet on the basis of no evidence other than that they disagreed with you.--[[User:Toddy1|Toddy1]] ([[User talk:Toddy1|talk]]) 17:44, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
Revision as of 17:44, 8 October 2013
JoshuSasori
- JoshuSasori (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JoshuSasori/Archive.
08 October 2013
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Papasrune (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Probably a waste of time for a 1-edit sock, but evident given the trouble on that 1 page so going through the motions for housekeeping purposes in case it gets used again. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Anyone who disagrees with you is a sockpuppet aren't they?--Toddy1 (talk) 08:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Toddy1, if you've got absolutely nothing constructive to say, then don't waste everyone else's time by commenting. If you really can't stop yourself, at least bother to look where you should place it. JoshuSasori is a CBANNED sockmaster, so every potential sock needs investigating, to either exonerate them, or prove their guilt. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:20, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- The editor has made one edit to Wikipedia. There is absolutely no evidence that he/she is a sock of anyone. Or if there is, where is it? Wikipedia has a policy of Wikipedia:Assume good faith. It is a breach of that policy to assume that anyone who disagrees with you is a sock puppet on the basis of no evidence other than that they disagreed with you.--Toddy1 (talk) 17:44, 8 October 2013 (UTC)