Accesscrawl (talk | contribs) |
Capankajsmilyo (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 318: | Line 318: | ||
* '''Merge''' per nom. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 21:50, 22 March 2020 (UTC) |
* '''Merge''' per nom. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 21:50, 22 March 2020 (UTC) |
||
* '''Keep''': Most of the parameters for {{t|Infobox Civil Air Patrol Wing}} don't exist in {{t|Infobox military unit}}. --<span class="nowrap">[[User:Diriector_Doc|<span style="color:#F0F">Diriector_Doc</span>]]┝<sup style="position:absolute">[[User_talk:Diriector_Doc|Talk]]<br /><span>[[Special:Contributions/Diriector_Doc|Contribs]]</span></sup>━━━┥</span> 16:15, 23 March 2020 (UTC) |
* '''Keep''': Most of the parameters for {{t|Infobox Civil Air Patrol Wing}} don't exist in {{t|Infobox military unit}}. --<span class="nowrap">[[User:Diriector_Doc|<span style="color:#F0F">Diriector_Doc</span>]]┝<sup style="position:absolute">[[User_talk:Diriector_Doc|Talk]]<br /><span>[[Special:Contributions/Diriector_Doc|Contribs]]</span></sup>━━━┥</span> 16:15, 23 March 2020 (UTC) |
||
* '''Merge''' per [[WP:INFOCOL]] [[User:Capankajsmilyo|Capankajsmilyo]]<sup>([[User talk:Capankajsmilyo|Talk]] | [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes/assistance|Infobox assistance]])</sup> 04:51, 25 March 2020 (UTC) |
|||
==== [[Template:Infobox nuclear weapons test]] ==== |
==== [[Template:Infobox nuclear weapons test]] ==== |
Revision as of 04:51, 25 March 2020
March 22
Warsaw
- Template:Districts of Warsaw (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Białołęka (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Neighbourhoods of Bemowo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Neighbourhoods of Bielany (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Neighbourhoods of Mokotów (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Neighbourhoods of Ochota (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Neighbourhoods of Praga-Północ (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Neighbourhoods of Praga-Południe (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Neighbourhoods of Rembertów (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Neighbourhoods of Śródmieście, Warsaw (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Neighbourhoods of Targówek (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Neighbourhoods of Ursus, Warsaw (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Neighbourhoods of Ursynów (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Neighbourhoods of Wawer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Neighbourhoods of Wesoła (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Neighbourhoods of Wilanów (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Neighbourhoods of Włochy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Neighbourhoods of Wola (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Neighbourhoods of Żoliborz (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Redundant to the new Template:Warsaw. Kochas (talk) 01:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose as not all links are included into the new template, and if they ever e included it will be a pure mess. --Andrei (talk) 00:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Andrei, alright, so what do you say we separate the districts from the main template, in one consolidated two-level template, with just the districts (just like I did with Mayors)? — we really don't need so, so many of these, especially when most of them have hardly any articles existing. – Kochas (talk) 02:00, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Warsaw landmarks
- Template:Warsaw landmarks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Redundant to the new Template:Culture in Warsaw. Kochas (talk) 01:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:German law section
- Template:German law section (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Complex external links template, supporting twenty jurisdictions, but with only five transclusions in all. Documentation is in German. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Seneca the Younger's plays
- Template:Seneca the Younger's plays (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Seneca the Younger (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Seneca the Younger's plays with Template:Seneca the Younger.
Duplicate content. Redundancy. PPEMES (talk) 19:40, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Lean support. All the content of this template seems to be in the main Seneca template, and that's not too big. P Aculeius (talk) 13:43, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Supporting merging Both templates deal with the same subject after all. Accesscrawl (talk) 03:38, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Milecastles
- Template:Milecastles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Hadrian's Wall forts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Milecastles with Template:Hadrian's Wall forts.
Surely these contents are too close not to consider a merge? PPEMES (talk) 19:35, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Merge - Suggest under the name 'Forts & Structures of Hadrian's Wall'. Forts being merged into the Milecastles template, positioned above existing blocks. Sammy_r (talk) 12:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- "Hadrian's Wall structures" is shorter and fully inclusive of all types; "Hadrian's Wall" would probably suffice. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:35, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Provinces of Roman Anatolia
- Template:Provinces of Roman Anatolia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Roman provinces AD 117 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Provinces of Roman Anatolia with Template:Roman provinces AD 117.
Any of the former that absolutely cannot be included in the latter scope? Perhaps also the final merged templates could section its contents just a little, distinguished by larger historical or contemporary regions? PPEMES (talk) 19:12, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose: The arguments here are similar to those of the proposed merger of the Diocletian provinces. One is clearly a subset of the other, and more appropriate to pages dealing with Anatolia alone. Thank you for letting me know --Michael Goodyear ✐ ✉ 20:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Ancient monuments in Rome
- Template:Ancient monuments in Rome (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox monument (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Ancient monuments in Rome with Template:Infobox monument.
Is it really motivated with a specific, separate template like that? PPEMES (talk) 19:08, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Do not merge Different types of monuments. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:59, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Merge as per Pigsonthewing. Puddleglum2.0(How's my driving?) 19:40, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Maury family tree
- Template:Maury family tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
How about deleting this template while relocating the contents to a plain article Maury family of Virginia, as main article of Category:Maury family of Virginia? PPEMES (talk) 18:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Roman religion (festival)
- Template:Roman religion (festival) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Roman myth (mortal) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Roman myth (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Pontifices Maximi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Ancient Roman religion horizontal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Roman religion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Roman religion (festival) with Template:Roman religion.
Would it be possible to collect this information into one single template? C.f. Template:Anglo-Saxon paganism, Template:Norse paganism topics etc. PPEMES (talk) 18:38, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Existing templates are appropriately scoped; a merged version would be too large. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Nikkimaria. There's something to be said for limiting the size of templates like this. P Aculeius (talk) 13:50, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Ancient Tiber bridges
- Template:Ancient Tiber bridges (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Roman bridges (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Ancient Tiber bridges with Template:Roman bridges.
See below. PPEMES (talk) 18:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. The scopes differ. "Roman bridges" is a behemoth that intimindates casual readers. "Tiber bridges" could be navigated as one would along a river: sailing from one bridge/article to the next. Breezy-easy.
Plus, extra info of "Tiber bridges" like the upstream/downstream division would probably just be lost/ignored in the "merge", which presumably would be simply an erasure-redirect-finito. --Menchi (talk) 20:08, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Roman bridges
- Template:Roman bridges (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Roman roads (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Roman bridges with Template:Roman roads.
Would be possible and desirable to merge this into some "Roman roads and bridges by contemporary country" kind of template? PPEMES (talk) 18:28, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Existing templates are appropriately scoped; a merged version would be too large. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Nikkimaria. The bridges template is quite large; adding a large section that doesn't deal with bridges wouldn't make sense, and you wouldn't want to mix roads in with the various regions; it doesn't help that most of them would go under Italy. P Aculeius (talk) 13:56, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Late Anatolian Roman provinces
- Template:Late Anatolian Roman provinces (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Late Roman provinces (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Late Anatolian Roman provinces with Template:Late Roman provinces.
Same time period? PPEMES (talk) 18:23, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose: I'm generally not a big fan of mergers. I created Late Anatolian Roman provinces 8 yrs ago, and as I state there, it was intended to be a subset of Roman provinces. Surely the latter can simply link to the former. We don't need to clutter up pages dealing with Roman Anatolia with lists of provinces covering the entire Roman Empire! (as long as navigation between the two is relatively simple) Are there separate templates for other prefectures or dioceses? --Michael Goodyear ✐ ✉ 20:40, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Michael Goodyear. If the smaller one links to the larger, I think that'd be enough; it's big enough by itself, and it looks useful to limit the scope of a template to related topics, even though larger templates are available to cover the entire empire. P Aculeius (talk) 14:01, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Epochs of Roman Emperors
- Template:Epochs of Roman Emperors (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Roman Emperors (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Epochs of Roman Emperors with Template:Roman Emperors.
Redundant duplification? With just a couple of links needing merge? PPEMES (talk) 18:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose merge. There's little duplication going on (the five major epochs figure in both, that's all). Other than that, the "Emperors" template is only suitable for biographical articles of individual emperors, and the "Epochs" template is only suitable for articles on epoch subdivisions (e.g. Year of the Six Emperors, which should *not* have a template with hundreds of names of individual emperors spreading over 15 centuries).
- The "Emperors" template is also fairly unworkable for size and number of links, and I'd propose to split it, at least in two separate templates, but probably better in four or five separate navboxes, no more than one per major subdivision of the epochs. --Francis Schonken (talk) 20:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Francis Schonken. The Roman Emperors template is quite large, and useful in its way, although I agree that it might benefit from splitting. There are a few ways to do this, but I would suggest following Michael Grant's approach, and splitting it at 476, so that the earlier list includes both eastern and western emperors through the fall of the Western Empire. The eastern emperors on this list could also be in the other template; I don't think a slight overlap would hurt anything. P Aculeius (talk) 14:06, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:The Jackson 5 singles
- Template:The Jackson 5 singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:The Jackson 5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:The Jackson 5 singles with Template:The Jackson 5.
Could this material somehow be merged? PPEMES (talk) 18:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Existing templates are appropriately scoped; a merged version would be too large. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:57, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose merge. The resulting template would be rather unwieldy. --FuriousFreddy (talk) 14:49, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Family tree
- Template:Family tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Tree chart (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Family tree with Template:Tree chart.
It says in the top of Template:Family tree that it is "deprecated", and that "Please use Template:Tree chart instead". However, I can't identify a proper merge request having been carried out for this purpose. Could this request be of help to get one step closer? Please note that there are wrapper templates belonging to both main templates. See also: Template:Tree_chart#Migration_from_familytree. PPEMES (talk) 17:56, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't know what would change with the proposed merge, but the decision should come fast, because the template for discussion is messing with the family trees. See here for example. T8612 (talk) 18:24, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Merge - they basically accomplish the exact same thing. Agricolae (talk) 20:12, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. What's the real reason of merging? The family trees should be kept separate because they give a quick and clear overwiew of the family members (like infoboxes or categories), while in the article itself they are often hidden and lost within content. Furthermore, the articles of notable families are often very large and the family tree chart at the end of an article would unnecessary make it even larger. --Silverije 00:13, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- This seems to misunderstand the proposal. There are currently two separate templates, Template:Family tree and Template:Tree chart (renamed a year ago from Template:Chart, which I didn't even know had happened until right now) that do exactly the same thing, make family tree-like charts that look exactly the same, but with minor differences in the coding. It is easier to keep track of the specific code for just one, rather than having to learn two different ones (and if you are like me, keep them straight rather than mistakenly using the code specific to one tree type on the other template, then having to redo it). There have also been several times when I have wanted to make a new tree by combining aspects of two existing trees, but I couldn't without a whole lot more work replacing code because they happened to have been made with the two different templates. Any useful trees (and any unnecessary ones) will still be in the same place they were before, just coded uniformly. Agricolae (talk) 08:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I partially misunderstood the proposal, because I didn't notice what happened to Trpimirović family tree until the day before yesterday (it was merged with the article). But still, Agricolae, are you sure that two separate templates, Template:Family tree and Template:Tree chart, are exactly the same thing, as you said? For instance, I've seen a "Tree chart" of the Family tree of Chinese monarchs (late) and it doesn't look exactly the same as many Family trees, but different. It's not called "Tree chart of Chinese monarchs" but "Family tree of Chinese monarchs"! I'm not a fan of mergers, especially when they cause misunderstanding. There is a Category:Family tree templates, but I haven't found a Category:Tree chart templates. Am I wrong? As for me, Template:Family tree is clear and understandable, while Tree chart is not. There is a Category:Charts, which is much larger (for financial, statistical and other purposes). The existing Template:Family tree is appropriately scoped and should be kept. I'm not sure what should be done with Template:Tree chart and whether a proposed merged version would be appropriate. --Silverije 00:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, I thought that was evident from the proposal. Thanks anyway. And if support here is evident, if the top note of this nomination affects lots of pages disproportionately, perhaps a snowball close could be motivated for this case? PPEMES (talk) 08:56, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- This seems to misunderstand the proposal. There are currently two separate templates, Template:Family tree and Template:Tree chart (renamed a year ago from Template:Chart, which I didn't even know had happened until right now) that do exactly the same thing, make family tree-like charts that look exactly the same, but with minor differences in the coding. It is easier to keep track of the specific code for just one, rather than having to learn two different ones (and if you are like me, keep them straight rather than mistakenly using the code specific to one tree type on the other template, then having to redo it). There have also been several times when I have wanted to make a new tree by combining aspects of two existing trees, but I couldn't without a whole lot more work replacing code because they happened to have been made with the two different templates. Any useful trees (and any unnecessary ones) will still be in the same place they were before, just coded uniformly. Agricolae (talk) 08:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Merge - I agree with Agricolae. They do the same thing. Thanks, Johannes Schade (talk) 07:54, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Replace as a merge seems to be not needed here (but count this as a support for "merge"). {{Family tree}} is marked as deprecated for ~2.5 years with a note to use {{Tree chart}}. There is no reason to support duplicate code bases, where one is apparently inferior. --Gonnym (talk) 09:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Ripper victims
- Template:Ripper victims (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Jack the Ripper (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Ripper victims with Template:Jack the Ripper.
That's one small sidebar. Better keep it together in the navbar? PPEMES (talk) 17:46, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete the former as redundant; all five entries are already in the latter. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:52, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete {{Ripper victims}} as Andy is correct. No need for duplicate templates. Keep articles less cluttered when possible. --Gonnym (talk) 09:05, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:PlayboyPlaymateTimeHeader
- Template:PlayboyPlaymateTimeHeader (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Playboy Playmates by year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:PlayboyPlaymateTimeHeader with Template:Playboy Playmates by year.
See below. If necessary, decades could be rendered in row sections in the merged destination template. PPEMES (talk) 17:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. The Decade header one is for categories and not articles. These templates should never be on the same pages. That said, the category template is not in use, so if it's not needed, delete. --Gonnym (talk) 09:09, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Playboy Playmate template list
- Template:Playboy Playmate template list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Playboy Playmates by year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Playboy Playmate template list with Template:Playboy Playmates by year.
One template location for this information should suffice? PPEMES (talk) 17:29, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support - exact same template. Can support the nested template if needed. --Gonnym (talk) 09:09, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:US Army tabs
- Template:US Army tabs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:US Army badges (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:US Army tabs with Template:US Army badges.
Seems like we could use a template which collects this all together? PPEMES (talk) 17:10, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose That's definately possible. But not all tabs are badges, and very few badges are tabs. Which makes the merging slightly odd. Do we duplicate the awards that are both tabs and badges on the same template in both categories? Plus, as it stands now, the badge template is a large bottom of entry template whereas the tab template is a narrow column template that appears in the top right of entries. Merging them would require us to bury the badge info in the giant bottom-of-entry badge template and think that would be a real loss to the nice tight tab template that figures on the tab entries. Lastly, tabs and badges are different awards in the US Army. Really, the only reason tabs appear as badges is because on dress uniforms sometimes the tab patches don't appear so they had to invent a way to include the tabs on those uniforms as badges. The Army's use of 'tabs' as a unique form of award seems odd, but it really is its own unique thing seperate from badges or medals or unit patches and I don't think conflating the tab template with the badge template is the best decision (although, it isn't a terrible idea. I see the thinking.). Atfyfe (talk) 00:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:USCG decorations
- Template:USCG decorations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:USAF decorations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:USArmy decorations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:US interservice decorations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:USCG decorations with Template:US interservice decorations.
If template such as Template:Orders, decorations, and medals of the United Kingdom can do it, surely this scope can as well? Merged template: Template:Awards and decorations of the United States Armed Forces. PPEMES (talk) 17:06, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Let's instead consider splitting the UK template. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:USServiceMedals
- Template:USWWServiceMedals (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:USArmyAwards (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:USDODAwards (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:USServiceMedals (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Contents may better be merged into Awards and decorations of the United States Armed Forces. PPEMES (talk) 16:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Subst and delete - each template is used once in one article. Subst the tables into those articles and delete the template. Templates should not hold content. --Gonnym (talk) 09:11, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Infobox tribe
- Template:Infobox tribe (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox ethnic group (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Infobox tribe with Template:Infobox ethnic group.
What constitutes a tribe and how, if, it is distinguishable from an ethnic group has proved hard to determine. As is the case the other way around. Perhaps better merge? PPEMES (talk) 16:24, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:51, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Merge per WP:INFOCOL Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 01:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. {{infobox tribe}} is for tribes defined narrowly as groups of people with descent from a shared ancestor, and so the infobox has fields for the name of the ancestor, for parent and daughter tribes, as well as for the surname (which is in many cases common to all members of the tribe). {{infobox ethnic group}} doesn't need these parameters, and conversely has a large number of other parameters that aren't relevant for tribes, such as the detailed per-region population fields. If {{infobox tribe}} is to be merged with anything, that would ideally be {{infobox clan}} (though there's still large non-overlap of parameters and the latter infobox appears to be fine-tuned for Scottish clans). – Uanfala (talk) 23:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Aristotelian logic
- Template:Aristotelian logic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Aristotelianism (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Aristotelian logic with Template:Aristotelianism.
Would a merged template make sense? PPEMES (talk) 14:31, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Nest instead of merging It is possible to nest one navbar template inside another. At most I would recommend nesting the logic template inside the main one. That way the logic articles would appear on all Aristotelianism template pages, but the Aristotelian logic pages would not be overburdened with the Aristotelianism entries.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 02:13, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Presocratics
- Template:Presocratics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Ancient Greek schools of philosophy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Presocratics with Template:Ancient Greek schools of philosophy.
Someoverlap, although may result in a disproportionately enlarged destination section. Yet, would it still be considerable per WP:NOTFINISHED with regards to the other sections in the destination template? PPEMES (talk) 14:28, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support On the condition that the Template:Ancient Greek schools of philosophy maintains the current layout of Template:Presocratics whereby philosophers are organised by school of philosophy. I'd be happy to add and organise Socratic and Hellenistic philosophers so to balance it out. Mugsalot (talk) 16:07, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:International human rights instruments
- Template:International human rights instruments (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:International criminal law (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:International human rights instruments with Template:International criminal law.
Please see below. PPEMES (talk) 14:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Merging would not be beneficial. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:International human rights organizations
- Template:International human rights organizations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:International criminal law (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:International human rights organizations with Template:International criminal law.
Some overlap indicated. Would it make sense to merge this for clearer overview and transparancy of interrelations of entries? PPEMES (talk) 14:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Merging would not be beneficial. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Tactile illusions
- Template:Auditory illusions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Temporal illusions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Tactile illusions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Optical illusions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Tactile illusions with Template:Optical illusions.
Would it be an idea to merge these contents into a Template:Illusions? PPEMES (talk) 14:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose The optical illusions template already links to other templates. Both Template:Auditory illusions and Template:Optical illusions contain a lot of examples and a lot of detail about two very different topic areas. I think a generalized "illusions" template would be more confusing and less useful than what we currently have. HouseOfChange (talk) 17:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. No reason given for the proposed merge. Is the goal is to have a nav box is that is huge and unwieldy? "Auditory", "temporal", "tacticle", and "optical" are not synonyms. Hyacinth (talk) 22:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Ancient Greek skepticism
- Template:Ancient Greek skepticism (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Skepticism (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Ancient Greek skepticism with Template:Skepticism.
Would it be fair to consider keeping these contents in one and the same template? PPEMES (talk) 13:56, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Good and evil
- Template:Good and evil (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Ethics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Good and evil with Template:Ethics.
Merge contents into proper section, perhaps in a subsection if necessary? PPEMES (talk) 13:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Logical truth
- Template:Logical truth (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Theories of truth (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Logical truth with Template:Theories of truth.
Merge into proper section? PPEMES (talk) 13:46, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Informal fallacies
- Template:Relevance fallacies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Informal fallacies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Formal fallacies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Informal fallacies with Template:Formal fallacies.
In order to create one Template:Fallacies?PPEMES (talk) 13:41, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Infobox rebbe
- Template:Infobox rebbe (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox Jewish leader (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Infobox rebbe with Template:Infobox Jewish leader.
Could this not be merged? PPEMES (talk) 13:25, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- I think that is possible, and even preferable. I see spouse2 and spouse3 parameters that need to be taken care of. Nevertheless, since this template has some 150 transclusions, we should think this over carefully. Debresser (talk) 15:12, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:48, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Merge. A Rebbe is a Jewish leader. --Gonnym (talk) 09:13, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Merge per WP:INFOCOL Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 01:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Infobox world university ranking
- Template:Infobox world university ranking (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox university rankings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Infobox world university ranking with Template:Infobox university rankings.
Couldn't this be merged? PPEMES (talk) 13:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- I believe the challenge here is mostly the syntax and complexity. it would be helpful to see a merged template to know what is involved in merging the two. Frietjes (talk) 17:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Infobox business school rankings
- Template:Infobox business school rankings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox university rankings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Infobox business school rankings with Template:Infobox university rankings.
Couldn't these contents be merged? PPEMES (talk) 13:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- I believe the challenge here is mostly the syntax and complexity. it would be helpful to see a merged template to know what is involved in merging the two. Frietjes (talk) 17:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Infobox command structure
- Template:Infobox command structure (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Infobox command structure with Template:Military unit sidebar.
Could this be implemented? PPEMES (talk) 13:07, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Infobox military memorial
- Template:Infobox military memorial (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox monument (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Infobox military memorial with Template:Infobox monument.
Redundancy? PPEMES (talk) 13:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Not redundant, former is clearly scoped and appropriate for its articles. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:06, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Merge per WP:INFOCOL Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 01:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Civil Air Patrol Wing
- Template:Infobox Civil Air Patrol Wing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox military unit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Infobox Civil Air Patrol Wing with Template:Infobox military unit.
Redundancy? PPEMES (talk) 12:59, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:50, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Most of the parameters for {{Infobox Civil Air Patrol Wing}} don't exist in {{Infobox military unit}}. --Diriector_Doc┝Talk
Contribs━━━┥ 16:15, 23 March 2020 (UTC) - Merge per WP:INFOCOL Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 04:51, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Infobox nuclear weapons test
- Template:Infobox nuclear weapons test (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox high explosive test (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Infobox nuclear weapons test with Template:Infobox high explosive test.
Redundancy? PPEMES (talk) 12:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:54, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
CTA s-line templates
- Template:CTA color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:CTA lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:CTA stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:CTA style (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
{{s-line}} templates for the Chicago Transit Authority, which operates the Chicago 'L'. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/CTA. All transclusions replaced. There are 38 dependent s-line data modules which should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 12:41, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:US regiments sidebar
- Template:Cavalry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Arkansas Confederate Artillery Batteries (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:WWII Philippine Army Divisions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:US regiments sidebar with Template:Military unit sidebar.
Seems like a more generic template is now available, since suggested merge-template was created? PPEMES (talk) 12:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Brandy Clark
- Template:Brandy Clark (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The "songs written" section should not be included since Brandy Clark did not perform these songs. It would be like including all the songs that Kris Kristofferson wrote on his template, or including every film an actor has acted in on their template. Take that away and you only have three albums which fail WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:22, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- TenPoundHammer, Why shouldn't songs written be on there? She's a songwriter for other artists. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:48, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Koavf: Because those songs are primarily associated with the singer, not the songwriter. Also see below where other songwriters such as Diane Warren do not have navboxes for their writing credits. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:39, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- TenPoundHammer, Note that there are now four album articles, the songs written, and the main article. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Koavf: Because those songs are primarily associated with the singer, not the songwriter. Also see below where other songwriters such as Diane Warren do not have navboxes for their writing credits. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:39, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. It seems a little overkill to start creating navboxes for songwriters and then the possible bloat of navboxes to the articles with songs written by multiple people. I certainly don't see a need for templates for Diane Warren or Dr. Luke, who've written dozens of songs for other artists. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:36, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete when the majority of the info in the template is for stuff that isn't even her own recorded and released work, it seems largely unnecessary. CloversMallRat (talk) 04:02, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep in my opinion the list of notable songs written by a songwriter is certainly something that should be included in this infobox, much as buildings by an artchitect may be included although they were constructed by someone else. --Tom (LT) (talk) 05:43, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:PitchforkVideo
- Template:PitchforkVideo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:RollingStoneSingle (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:ConsequenceOfSoundSong (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:NMESingle (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:PitchforkSong (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:PitchforkDecade (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:NMEAlbum (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:NMEAlbum (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:PitchforkDecadeSongs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:RollingStoneAlbum (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Rock Sound Albums of the Year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Billboard Year-End number one albums (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:NAACP Image Award for Outstanding Album (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:PitchforkAlbum (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:ConsequenceOfSoundAlbum (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums#Template:PitchforkDecade, etc. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:33, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete all as per discussion. Any publication or organization can give awards. They may increase their visibility, web traffic, etc., but are not recognized as important by writers in biographies, encyclopedias, and other music references. —Ojorojo (talk) 14:35, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Billboard Year-End number one albums as that represents actual performance rather than a particular magazine's opinion of what is best. That topic is not like the others. No opinion on the rest. Rlendog (talk) 13:03, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep only Billboard Year-End number one albums (which is statistical, not opinion) and Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award (career recognition), and Delete the rest of the templates. We have tons of music magazines and newspapers, and we certainly do not need "best xxx" opinion templates for each of this publications. Bluesatellite (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2020 (UTC)