→Discrepancy?: new section |
|||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
== Discrepancy? == |
== Discrepancy? == |
||
It seems there is a discrepancy between how this page is presented and what is talked about on the |
It seems there is a discrepancy between how this page is presented and what is talked about on the [[coi]] page. I feel it is unclear because of this discrepancy when an editor should and should not use the coi tag. |
||
[[User:L1R5M1|L1R5M1]] ([[User talk:L1R5M1|talk]]) 12:30, 14 January 2016 (UTC) |
[[User:L1R5M1|L1R5M1]] ([[User talk:L1R5M1|talk]]) 12:30, 14 January 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:31, 14 January 2016
Sources on conflict of interest
- (chronological)
- Michael Davis, "Conflict of Interest," Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 1(4), 1982, pp. 17–27 (influential)
- Luebke, Neil R. "Conflict of Interest as a Moral Category," Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 6, 1987, pp. 66–81. JSTOR 27799930 (influential)
- Michael Davis, "Conflict of Interest Revisited," Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 12(4), Winter 1993, pp. 21–41. JSTOR 27800924
- Michael Davis, Andrew Stark (eds.). Conflict of Interest in the Professions, University of Oxford Press, 2001.
- Andrew Stark, Conflict of Interest in American Public Life, Harvard University Press, 2003.
- Sheldon Krimsky, "The Ethical and Legal Foundations of Scientific 'Conflict of Interest'", in Trudo Lemmings and Duff R. Waring (eds.), Law and Ethics in Biomedical Research: Regulation, Conflict of Interest, and Liability, University of Toronto Press, 2006.
- Bernard Lo and Marilyn J. Field (eds.), Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice, National Academies Press, 2009.
- Wayne Norman, Chris McDonald, "Conflicts of Interest", in George G. Brenkert, Tom L. Beauchamp (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 441–470.
a question
"Any external relationship – personal, religious, political, academic, financial or legal – can trigger a COI." Does this mean one should not edit about the topic of their expertise? Or theories they lecture on universities? 212.200.65.127 (talk) 14:45, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- @212.200.65.127: No it does not. Expert editors are welcome, but self-promotion is not. Citing your own work for instance is permitted as long as it is relevant, balanced, and in line with other policies. See advice for Expert editors and Wikipedia editing for research scientists. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:46, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
COI unchecked
As long as folks advertise their services as this man here promising "For your protection – WILL NEVER DISCLOSE MY CLIENTS – I never disclose my clients in order to protect their anonymity" here, these rules do remain toothless.--Wuerzele (talk) 06:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Discrepancy?
It seems there is a discrepancy between how this page is presented and what is talked about on the coi page. I feel it is unclear because of this discrepancy when an editor should and should not use the coi tag.