Content deleted Content added
LinguistAtLarge (talk | contribs) m →Proposed changes/addtions: new section |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Essays|importance=low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Academic Journals|class=Project}} |
|||
==Your recent edits== |
==Your recent edits== |
||
Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:S_Marshall/Essay&diff=276064817&oldid=276062009 this edit], I interpret this, of course, as another attempt at recoloniZation! That aside, these were good edits. I'm glad you brought this to Linguist at Large's attention. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 17:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC) |
Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:S_Marshall/Essay&diff=276064817&oldid=276062009 this edit], I interpret this, of course, as another attempt at recoloniZation! That aside, these were good edits. I'm glad you brought this to Linguist at Large's attention. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 17:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:14, 5 April 2016
![]() | Essays Low‑impact ![]() | |||||||||
|
![]() | Academic Journals Project‑class | ||||||
|
Your recent edits
Regarding this edit, I interpret this, of course, as another attempt at recoloniZation! That aside, these were good edits. I'm glad you brought this to Linguist at Large's attention. Drmies (talk) 17:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Proposed changes/addtions
1. Add a tl;dr summary at the top:
2. Add a sentence mentioning the incongruity of using a given journal as a reliable source for other articles while that same journal is deemed not notable in terms of having an article itself.
What do you think of these ideas? — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 21:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)