![]() | Islam Project‑class | ||||||
|
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/WikiProject used
2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f7/Magic_Wand_Icon_229981_Color_Flipped.svg/220px-Magic_Wand_Icon_229981_Color_Flipped.svg.png)
Greetings WikiProject Islam Members!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.
Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 18:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Merge proposals for Marifa
Hey all! Could someone take a look at the several merges proposed to Marifa and see if they have any merit? If so, you can probably just go ahead and perform the merges, they seem uncontroversial (i.e. no one has stepped forward to oppose the tags). Thanks! Ajpolino (talk) 02:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Merging and converting sidebar templates
Just a heads up: I am going to merge together {{Imam}}, {{Nizārī}}, and {{Shia Imams}} into one horizontal navbar. My main concern with the status quo is that, especially for the earlier imams which are common to all denominations, there is a lot of WP:TEMPLATECREEP. For example: Ali ibn Husayn Zayn al-Abidin has all three of them, in addition to an infobox. It is taking up a lot of space and pushes down other files/images so they end up far away from their intended section. --HyperGaruda (talk) 07:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Done. The new template is located at {{Shia Imams}}, with the others being redirects to there. I have already relocated the template's transclusions on its respective pages. --HyperGaruda (talk) 07:21, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Reorganizing hijab articles
There's a discussion of reorganizing content from several hijab-related articles here Talk:Hijab_by_country#merge_proposal. Your thoughts would be appreciated. Eperoton (talk) 15:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Missing topics list
My list of missing topics about Islam is updated - Skysmith (talk) 15:52, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Question on a talk page
I had a question about an honorific used on a talk page. Here's the story:
Earlier today, I [| reverted the honorific (PBUH) used in a talk page after the name of Mohammed. I left the poster a polite note on their page explaining that this is recommended to not happen, per WP:PBUH.
I just had the edit reverted by Rivertorch with the edit summary Undid good-faith edit. It's a talk page, not an article..
I agree that it's a talk page, however, the idea behind WP:PBUH was to keep Wikipedia neutral, and I believe removing the honorific from a talk page is in keeping with that idea.
Just in case you're wondering, I'm not Muslim, but have work along side many Muslims and respect their belief. Also just so we're clear, if this were an editor writing something like : ... and Moses (Praise the lord) reached out his hand, and Moses (Praise the Lord)...." on a talk page, I'd remove it just as quickly, again for Neutrality sake.
So.... long story short, is the honorific ok on a talk page, but not on an article ? Or should the honorific be removed from both a talk page and an article. ƘƟ SĦ 16:55, 26 January 2017 (UTC)