→Protests: rm vandalism |
→Hiddington Petition: Trying to correct the spelling of this quote; please check it. |
||
Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
It is believed that the Scottish witch-hunt started in April 1661, because of the Hiddington petition. [[Earl Hiddington]] was a Scottish who had influenced the parliament to make a commission on witch-hunts in Scotland. It is said that the ruling elite were in favor of this petition because they had a fear of witchcraft<ref>Brian P. Levack, “The Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661-1662.” The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1. (Autumn, 1980), 97-101. (Accessed form JSTOR on October 9, 2007) </ref>The typical accusation of witchcraft was because of the following.<ref>Brian P. Levack, “The Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661-1662.” The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1. (Autumn, 1980), 97-101. (Accessed form JSTOR on October 9, 2007) </ref> |
It is believed that the Scottish witch-hunt started in April 1661, because of the Hiddington petition. [[Earl Hiddington]] was a Scottish who had influenced the parliament to make a commission on witch-hunts in Scotland. It is said that the ruling elite were in favor of this petition because they had a fear of witchcraft<ref>Brian P. Levack, “The Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661-1662.” The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1. (Autumn, 1980), 97-101. (Accessed form JSTOR on October 9, 2007) </ref>The typical accusation of witchcraft was because of the following.<ref>Brian P. Levack, “The Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661-1662.” The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1. (Autumn, 1980), 97-101. (Accessed form JSTOR on October 9, 2007) </ref> |
||
:''“…harmful deeds, such as injuring or causing the death of their neighbors, making them tremble or |
:''“…harmful deeds, such as injuring or causing the death of their neighbors, making them tremble or sweat, preventing them from arriving at their destinations, riding horses to death, turning over stones to prevent corn from growing and burning barns”''<ref>Brian P. Levack, The Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661-1662, page 98</ref> |
||
It is thought that sections of the Hiddington petitions have some similarities with the [[Malleus Maleficarum]]. For example, the physical characteristics that describes witches and the harm that witches can do to their victims. The other reason why it is believe it has some similarities is because the Melleus Maleficarum mentions that women are pure evil.<ref>Carol F. Karlsen, The Devil in the Shape of a Woman: Witchcraft in Colonial New England (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1998), 156 </ref> During the witch hunt in Scotland 84 percent of the accused were women <ref>Brian P. Levack, “The Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661-1662.” The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1. (Autumn, 1980), 97-101. (Accessed form JSTOR on October 9, 2007) </ref>. |
It is thought that sections of the Hiddington petitions have some similarities with the [[Malleus Maleficarum]]. For example, the physical characteristics that describes witches and the harm that witches can do to their victims. The other reason why it is believe it has some similarities is because the Melleus Maleficarum mentions that women are pure evil.<ref>Carol F. Karlsen, The Devil in the Shape of a Woman: Witchcraft in Colonial New England (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1998), 156 </ref> During the witch hunt in Scotland 84 percent of the accused were women <ref>Brian P. Levack, “The Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661-1662.” The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1. (Autumn, 1980), 97-101. (Accessed form JSTOR on October 9, 2007) </ref>. |
Revision as of 00:28, 18 December 2007
- "Witch trial" redirects here. For the Charmed episode, see Witch Trial (Charmed episode). For the Rush song, see Fear series. For the novel by Ian Rankin, see Witch Hunt (novel).
A witch-hunt is a search for witches or evidence of witchcraft, often involving moral panic, mass hysteria and mob lynching, but in historical instances also legally sanctioned and involving official witchcraft trials.
The classical period of witch-hunts in Europe falls into the Early Modern period or about 1450 to 1700, spanning the upheavals of the Reformation and the Thirty Years' War, resulting in tens of thousands of executions.
Many cultures throughout the world, both ancient and modern, have reacted to allegations of witchcraft either with superstitious fear and awe, and killed any alleged practitioners of witchcraft outright; or, shunned it as quackery, extortion or fraud. Witch-hunts still occur in the modern era in many communities where religious values condemn the practice of witchcraft and the occult.
The term "witch-hunt" is often used to refer to similarly panic-induced searches for perceived wrong-doers other than witches. The best known example is probably the McCarthyist search for communists during the Cold War.
Antiquity
Punishment for sorcery is addressed in the earliest law codes preserved; both in ancient Egypt and in Babylonia it played a conspicuous part. The Code of Hammurabi (18th century BC short chronology) prescribes that
- If a man has put a spell upon another man and it is not justified, he upon whom the spell is laid shall go to the holy river; into the holy river shall he plunge. If the holy river overcome him and he is drowned, the man who put the spell upon him shall take possession of his house. If the holy river declares him innocent and he remains unharmed the man who laid the spell shall be put to death. He that plunged into the river shall take possession of the house of him who laid the spell upon him.[1]
The pre-Christian Twelve Tables of pagan Roman law has provisions against evil incantations and spells intended to damage corn.
The Hebrew Bible condemns sorcery. Deuteronomy 18:11-12 calls it an "abomination" and Exodus 22:18 prescribes "thou shalt not suffer a witch to live"[2], and tales like that of 1 Samuel 28, reporting how Saul "hath cut off those that have familiar spirits, and the wizards, out of the land"[3] suggesting that in practice, sorcery could at least lead to exile.
In later Jewish history, Rabbi Simeon ben Shetach - Pharisee scholar and Nasi of the Sanhedrin in the First Century B.C. - is reported to have on a single day sentenced to death eighty women in Ashkelon, who had been charged with witchcraft. Later, the women's relatives took revenge by bringing false witnesses against Simeon's son and causing him to be executed in turn.
The 6th Century Getica of Jordanes records a mythical persecution and expulsion of witches among the Goths in an account of the origin of the Huns. The ancient fabled King Filimer is said to have
- "found among his people certain witches, whom he called in his native tongue Haliurunnae. Suspecting these women, he expelled them from the midst of his race and compelled them to wander in solitary exile afar from his army. There the unclean spirits, who beheld them as they wandered through the wilderness, bestowed their embraces upon them and begat this savage race, which dwelt at first in the swamps, a stunted, foul and puny tribe, scarcely human, and having no language save one which bore but slight resemblance to human speech."[4]
Middle Ages
During the Early Middle Ages, the Church did not conduct witch trials. Canon law, in Canon Episcopi, followed the views of the church father Augustine of Hippo (AD 400) that belief in the existence of witchcraft was heresy, since according to Augustine "a heretic is one who either devises or follows false and new opinions, for the sake of some temporal profit". [citation needed] The Council of Paderborn in 785 explicitly outlawed the very belief in witches, and Charlemagne later confirmed the law. The first[citation needed] medieval trials against witches date to the 13th century with the institution of the Inquisition, but they were a side issue, as the Church was concentrating on the persecution of heresy, and witchcraft, alleged or real, was treated as any other sort of heresy.
There were still secular laws against witchcraft, such as that promulgated by King Athelstan (924-999)
- And we have ordained respecting witch-crafts, and lybacs, and morthdaeds: if any one should be thereby killed, and he could not deny it, that he be liable in his life. But if he will deny it, and at threefold ordeal shall be guilty; that he be 120 days in prison: and after that let kindred take him out, and give to the king 120 shillings, and pay the wer to his kindred, and enter into borh for him, that he evermore desist from the like.[5]
It had been proposed that the witch-hunt developed in Europe after the Cathars and the Templar Knights were exterminated and the Inquisition had to turn to persecution of witches to remain active. In the middle of 1970s, this hypothesis was independently disproved by two historians (Cohn 1975; Kieckhefer 1976). It was shown that the pursuit originated amongst common people in Switzerland and in Croatia that pressed on the civil courts to support them. Inquisitorial courts became systematically involved in the witch-hunt only in the 15th century: in the case of the Madonna Oriente, the Inquisition of Milan was not sure what to do with two women who in 1384 and in 1390 confessed to have participated in a type of white magic.
Early Modern Europe
At the time, Basel was a center of theologians who preached the dangers of witchcraft, and with the Council of Basel (1431-1449), their ideas came to the attention of a wider audience. The European witch-hunts only began on a large scale in the wake of the Council, from the 1450s, and was sustained throughout the Early Modern period.
Rather than a theologically sanctioned campaign of the church, the phenomenon had all traits of mass hysteria. The classical attributes of a witch—flying on brooms, intercourse with the Devil, and meeting of demons and other witches at sabbats—became canonical from around 1400, although similar accusations had been issued against heretics since the 11th century. The idea of witch sabbats fostered a classical conspiracy theory, with fantasies of an underground witch sect plotting to overthrow Christianity[citation needed]. The areas mainly affected by this were the Holy Roman Empire and adjacent parts, as well as Scotland. Reprints of the Malleus Maleficarum in 29 editions between 1487 and 1669 mark the peak of the European craze. This book had been condemned by the Catholic Church in 1490 but continued to be widely used by secular witch-hunting courts. The clergy and the intellectuals began to speak out against the trials from the late 16th century. Johannes Kepler in 1615 could only by the weight of his prestige keep his mother from being burnt as a witch. The 1692 Salem witch trials were a brief outburst of witch hysteria in the New World at a time when the practice was already waning in Europe. Winifred King was the last person tried for witchcraft in New England. Winifred's daughter Winifred Jr and mother Mary Hale were also tried for witchcraft.[citation needed]
Although the reasons for the witch scares are debated, there is a correlation between centralized government and acquittals in witch trials. Most witch trials that resulted in convictions took place in rural areas. In these areas there was about a 90% conviction (and execution) rate. Although most citizens of the time did believe that witchcraft was real, equally they were not ignorant of how personal interests could be involved in accusations. Another interesting aspect of witchcraft in the early modern period is how the highest concentration of trials took place in border areas lacking strong central authority and in social turmoil, especially in northern Italy, Switzerland, Germany, eastern France and the French-Spanish border.[6][7] Witch trials were significantly less common in both Catholic and Protestant countries that were less affected by Reformation upheavals than were the torn regions of central and north-western Europe. The Spanish Inquisition was generally skeptical on the reality of witchcraft, while in Italy (except Lombardy under French laws) the trials were rare and with relatively mild consequences. In England this was largely due to the 1563 Witchcraft Act and the Anglican doctrine of lack of miracles.[7]
The period of witch trials came in waves and then subsided. There were early trials in the 15th and early 16th centuries, but then the witch scare went into decline, before becoming a big issue again and peaking in the 17th century. Some scholars argue that a fear of witchcraft started among intellectuals who believed in maleficium; that is, bad deeds. What had previously been a belief that some people possessed supernatural abilities (which sometimes resulted in protecting the people), now became a sign of a pact between these people with supernatural abilities and the devil. Witchcraft became associated with wild Satanic ritual parties in which there was much naked dancing, orgy sex, and cannibalistic infanticide.
Witch-hunts were seen across early modern Europe, but the most significant area of witch-hunting in modern Europe is often considered to be southwestern Germany[citation needed]. In Germany the number of trials compared to other regions of Europe shows it to have been a late starter. Witch-hunts first appeared in large numbers in southern France and Switzerland during the 14th and 15th centuries. The peak years of witch-hunts in southwest Germany were from 1561 to 1670.[8] The first major persecution in Europe, that caught, tried, convicted, and burned witches in the imperial lordship of Wiesensteig in southwestern Germany, is recorded in 1563 in a pamphlet called “True and Horrifying Deeds of 63 Witches” [9]
Trials
There were extensive efforts to root out the supposed influence of Satan by various measures aimed at the people who were accused of being servants of Satan. To a lesser degree, animals were also targeted for prosecution, as described in the article animal trial. People suspected of being "possessed" by Satan were put on trial. These trials were biased against the alleged witch. On the other hand, the church also attempted to extirpate the superstitious belief in witchcraft and sorcery, considering it as fraud in most cases.
The evidence required to convict an alleged witch varied from country to country - but prosecutions everywhere were most frequently sparked off by denunciations, while convictions invariably required a confession. The latter was often obtained by extremely violent methods. Although Europe's witch-frenzy did not begin until the late 1400s - long after the formal abolition of "ordeal" in 1215 - brutal techniques were routinely used to extract the required admission of guilt. They included hot pincers, the thumbscrew, and the 'swimming' of suspects (an old superstition whereby innocence was established by immersing the accused in water for a sufficiently long period of time). Investigators were consequently able to establish many fantastic crimes that could never have occurred, even in theory. That said, many judicial procedures of the time required proof of a causative link between the alleged act of witchcraft and an identifiable injury, such as a death or property damage.
The flexibility of the crime and the methods of proving it resulted in easy convictions. Any reckoning of the death toll should take account of the facts that rules of evidence varied from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and that a significant number of witch trials always ended in acquittal. :"In York, England, at the height of the Great Hunt (1567–1640) one half of all witchcraft cases brought before church courts were dismissed for lack of evidence. No torture was used, and the accused could clear himself by providing four to eight "compurgators", people who were willing to swear that he wasn't a witch. Only 21% of the cases ended with convictions, and the Church did not impose any kind of corporal or capital punishment."[6] In the Pays de Vaud, nine of every ten people tried were put to death, but in Finland, the corresponding figure was about one in six (16%). A breakdown of conviction rates (along with statistics on death tolls, gender bias, and much else) can be found in Brian Levack, The Witch-Hunt in Early Modern Europe (2nd ed, 1995).
There are particularly important differences between the English and continental witch-hunting traditions. The checks and balances inherent in the jury system, which required a 23-strong body (the grand jury) to indict and a 12-strong one (the petit jury) to convict, always had a restraining effect on prosecutions. Another restraining influence was its relatively rare use of torture: the country formally permitted it only when authorised by the monarch, and no more than 81 torture warrants were issued (for all offences) throughout English history.[10] Continental European courts, while varying from region to region, tended to concentrate power in individual judges and place far more reliance on torture. The significance of the institutional difference is most clearly established by a comparison of the witch-hunts of England and Scotland, for the death toll inflicted by the courts north of the border always dwarfed that of England.[11] It is also apparent from an episode of English history during the early 1640s, when the Civil War resulted in the suspension of jury courts for three years. Several freelance witch-hunters emerged during this period, the most notorious of whom was Matthew Hopkins, who emerged out of East Anglia and proclaimed himself "Witchfinder General".[12] Such men were inquisitors in all but name, proceeding pursuant to denunciations and torture and claiming a mastery of the supposed science of demonology that allowed for identification of the guilty by, for example, the discovery of witches' marks. Research into the laws and records of the time show that the witchfinders often used peine forte et dure and other torture to extract confessions and condemnations of friends, relatives and neighbors.
Besides torture, at trial certain "proofs" were taken as valid to establish that a person practiced witchcraft. Peter Binsfeld contributed to the establishment of many of these proofs, described in his book Commentarius de Maleficius (Comments on Witchcraft).
- The diabolical mark. Usually, this was a mole or a birthmark. If no such mark was visible, the examiner would claim to have found an invisible mark.
- Diabolical pact. This was an alleged pact with Satan to perform evil acts in return for rewards.
- Denouncement by another witch. This was common, since the accused could often avoid execution by naming accomplices.
- Relationship with other convicted witch/witches
- Blasphemy
- Participation in Sabbaths
- To cause harm that could only be done by means of sorcery
- Possession of elements necessary for the practice of black magic
- To have one or more witches in the family
- To be afraid during the interrogatories
- Not to cry under torment (supposedly by means of the Devil's aid)
- To have had sexual relationships with a demon
In England, witch-pricking was common. It was believed that the diabolical mark would neither bleed, hurt nor show a wound when stabbed by a needle.
An overview of the history of Europe's witch-hunts - which traces the continuities between the witch-hunts' continental origins, its later manifestions in England and colonial America, and the late twentieth-century pursuit of supposed Satanist child abusers - can be found in Sadakat Kadri's The Trial, A History, from Socrates to O.J. Simpson (Random House, 2005).
Queen Elizabeth I of England and King James VI of Scotland saw the act of rebellion as a blasphemy. They thought that if a rebel was against them, it was as if the rebel was against God himself [13] During the 1500’s and 1600’s most people saw the act of rebellion being connected directly to the devil, because the devil caused a revolt against the authority of God. As a consequence the act of rebellion was seen as something wicked. This is why the majority of the people during the 1500’s and 1600’s in 1600’s in the England and Scotland were afraid to raise up against ruling class [14]King James VI of Scotland (or James I of England) thought the following about witches,
- “Witches are servant only, and slaves to the Devil; but the Necromancers are his masters and commanders” [15]
King James VI's Daemonologie stated that women are more comment to use magic. King James VI Daemonologie, said :“Witches could be transported…by natural means, or they could be carried through the air, “by the force of the sprit which is their conducter,” [16]
On the other hand Queen Elizabeth I was very suspicious and she was afraid of witchcraft. She was very cautious because during her regime she was in a conflict with Spain and the Catholics Church. During her regime that lasted form 1558 to 1603, there were several events occurring in England, Scotland, and Ireland that raised the level of fear towards witchcraft. Many people at that time believed that the Bubonic Plague that struck the city of London in 1603 was an act of witches[17]
Religious persecution was a reason why there was a high amount of witch hunts in England and in Scotland. The separation between the Catholic Church and the protestant Church of England caused the witch hunts to initiate[18]
The witch trial of Essex 1640’s
During 1600’s the English courts did not use torture as a method of witch hunt [19]The only case that torture was used was in the 1645 trail in Essex. One example of the torture that the accused suffered in Essex is that the judges would wake up the accused at the middle of the night and would wet him with cold water and start questioning him. The judges would order the guards to not let the accused fall asleep[20]
Alan Macfarlane, author of the book Witchcraft in Tudor and Stuart England - A regional and Comparative Study, found that the diaries of the English people that live in the 1600’s to 1500’s did not mention any of the witches’ trails that occurred in their county. With the exception of 3 diaries that were found in the Essex County. Those diaries were from Richard Rogers “a preacher at Wethersfield from about 1575 to 1618.” Richard Rogers discussed the witch trails from 1587-90. The second diary was from Arthur Wilson, who was a steward and was present at the witch trails of 1645. Finally the third diary was from Ralph Josselin Vicar of Earl’s Colne from 1641 to 1683. Ralph Josselin did not mention any witch trail in his dairy. He only mentions his suspicion of two women of being witches . In other words it is hard to find any evidences on the witch trails of Essex England. Alan Macfarlane says that the majority of the accusers of the witch hunts in Essex England were women.[21]
Reginald Scot
In 1584 Reginald Scot published The Discovery of Witchcraft in which he argued that witchcraft existed only in fantasy, and that the witch trials were unchristian and full of injustices. The book mocks the lurid witch-hunter's manual, the Malleus Maleficarum. In 1603 James I ordered all copies of the book burnt.[22] According to K. Briggs, Scot was inspired by an "…impulse of chivalry and a desire to protect those old, weak and ignorant people for whom no one spoke."[23]
The Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661-1662
During 1661 to 1662 Scotland held one of the largest witch hunts in European history, in which an estimated 600 people were accused of witchcraft or ritually summoning the devil. How many were executed in the 16 month period is unknown. With the exception of the witch-hunt of 1597, there had never previously been so many people convicted of witchcraft.[clarification needed]
The hunt began in Lothian, Scotland, for unknown reasons. It is also unknown what types of people were accused of witchcraft, and why the accusations suddenly stopped.
The hunt began two years after the death of Oliver Cromwell and a year after Charles II had recovered the crown, making him the king of England, Scotland, and Ireland. Brian Levack argues that the reason for such a large number of accusations may have been a display of power by the regime of Charles II.[24] According to Levack:
- “Unless the English commissioners had been succeeded by a Scottish justice general, unless the Privy Council and parliament of Scotland had been restored, and unless the regular judicial institutions had been returned to smooth working order, the Great Hunt probably would never have occurred.”[25]
Many of those which were convicted of witchcraft during the rule of Oliver Cromwell were found innocent after his death in 1659, but of these many were re-accused by the administration of Charles II.[26]
Hiddington Petition
It is believed that the Scottish witch-hunt started in April 1661, because of the Hiddington petition. Earl Hiddington was a Scottish who had influenced the parliament to make a commission on witch-hunts in Scotland. It is said that the ruling elite were in favor of this petition because they had a fear of witchcraft[27]The typical accusation of witchcraft was because of the following.[28]
- “…harmful deeds, such as injuring or causing the death of their neighbors, making them tremble or sweat, preventing them from arriving at their destinations, riding horses to death, turning over stones to prevent corn from growing and burning barns”[29]
It is thought that sections of the Hiddington petitions have some similarities with the Malleus Maleficarum. For example, the physical characteristics that describes witches and the harm that witches can do to their victims. The other reason why it is believe it has some similarities is because the Melleus Maleficarum mentions that women are pure evil.[30] During the witch hunt in Scotland 84 percent of the accused were women [31].
The Hiddington petition mentions the characteristics of the mark of the devil, which is a way to identify a witch and the recommendations by King James II on how to identify a witch and know the devils mark. Hiddington also mentions that the majority of the elite of Scotland intended to abolish sinful acts like witchcraft from Scotland.[32]
Additional events of witch hunt and accusations in Scotland during the 1500’s and 1600’s
During the 1500’s and the 1600’s, there were women in Scotland that were accused and tortured. Unlike England, it is believed that the majority of women confessed to being witches because they were tortured. The historian Diane Purkiss said that due to the torture that women received, the majority said the first thing that came to their mind in order to stop the torture.
- “…witches were then tortured- you are probably going to try to say anything. But people cannot talk about what they don’t know, but only about what they know. If asked to produce stories they have read.”[33][verification needed]
Nonetheless, there were also some women in Scotland accused of witchcraft because they told stories about fairies and believed in them. The judges saw that the confession of believing in fairies as the same as being allied with the devil.
- “When these women talked about fairies, interrogators thought they were hearing about a pact with the devil.”[34]
There are a few cases were Scottish women willingly admitted being witches and practicing magic. That was enough evidence to be convicted of witchcraft. Any type of magical or cult practice was seen to be a direct relation with the devil. Women like Bassie Dunlop (who was tried in 1576) and Elspeth Reoch (who was tried in 1616) were accused of witches craft because both of them were practicing magic. Although witchcraft was outlawed in England during the 1500's and 1600's, some women were practicing witchcraft. The only difference is that they did not make witchcraft to harm a person, but to cure and to help people. They would be fortune tellers and would recommend certain herbs as medicine.[35]
Gender
Gender plays an important role in the witch hunts of early modern Europe. Almost everywhere women were accused and executed more than men, with 80% of those accused and 85% of those executed in Europe being women.[36][37] In a few countries however, men accounted for the majority of the accused. In Iceland, for instance, over 90% of the accused were men,[37] and in Estonia 60% of the accused victims were male, mainly middle-aged or elderly married peasants, and known healers or sorcerers.[38]
Anne Llewellyn Barstow claims that a combination of factors, including the greater value placed on men as workers in the increasingly wage oriented economy and a greater fear of women as inherently evil, loaded the scales against women, even when the charges against them were identical to those against men.[39]
Executions
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b2/Punishing-witches-Laienspiegel.jpg/240px-Punishing-witches-Laienspiegel.jpg)
The sentence generally was death (as Exodus 22:18 states, "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live"). There were other sentences, the most common to be chained for years to the oars of a ship, or excommunicated then imprisoned.
The most common death sentence was to be burnt at the stake while still alive. In England it was common to hang the person first and then burn the corpse, a practice adopted sometimes in other countries (in many cases the hanging was replaced by strangling). Drowning was sometimes used as a means of execution. England was also the only country in which the accused had the right to appeal the sentence.
The most common methods used to execute alleged witches were burning and hanging. The frequent use of 'swimming' to test innocence/guilt means that an unknown number also drowned more or less accidentally prior to conviction. Burning at the stake was common on the Continent as a penalty for heresy, but the common-law jurisdictions of England and colonial America invariably sent people convicted of witchcraft to the gallows. (In a handful of exceptional cases, such as that of Giles Corey at Salem, alleged witches who refused to plead were pressed to death without trial.) More generally, the majority of trials have always occurred within "Christian/European/American cultures; they were most often justified there with reference to the Bible's prescriptions: "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live." (Exodus 22:18) and "A man also or woman that hath a familiar spirit, or that is a wizard, shall surely be put to death: they shall stone them with stones" (Leviticus 20:27).
The measures employed against alleged witches were some of the worst ever to be legally sanctioned in the Western world. In A History of Torture, George Ryley Scott says:
- "The peculiar beliefs and superstitions attached to or associated with witchcraft caused those who were suspected of practising the craft to be extremely likely to be subjected to tortures of greater degree than any ordinary heretic or criminal. More, certain specific torments were invented for use against them."
It has been suggested that the execution of persons associated with witchcraft resulted in the loss of much traditional knowledge and folklore, which was often regarded with suspicion and tainted by association.[40]
Number of executions
Estimates of the numbers of women, men and children executed for participating in witchcraft vary wildly depending on the method used to generate the estimate. The total number of witch trials in Europe which are known for certain to have ended in executions is around 12,000[citation needed].
Brian Levack, author of The Witch Hunt in Early Modern Europe, took the number of known European witch trials and multiplied it by the average rate of conviction and execution. This provided him with a figure of around 60,000 deaths.
Anne Lewellyn Barstow, author of Witchcraze, arrived at a number of approximately 100,000 deaths by attempting to adjust Levack's estimate to account for what she believed were unaccounted lost records, although historians have pointed out that Levack's estimate had already been adjusted for these.
Ronald Hutton, author of Pagan Religions of the Ancient British Isles and Triumph of the Moon: A History of Modern Pagan Witchcraft, in his unpublished essay "Counting the Witch Hunt", counted local estimates, and in areas where estimates were unavailable attempted to extrapolate from nearby regions with similar demographics and attitudes towards witch hunting. He reached an estimate of 40,000 total executions, which appears to be emerging as the most widely accepted figure among academics. Cohn, Europe's Inner Demons, p. 253 denounces as "fantastic exaggerations" numbers of several hundred thousands.[41]
Table of recorded and estimated executions according to Hutton's estimates[42]
Country | Recorded | Estimated |
---|---|---|
America | 36 | 35 - 37 |
Austria | ?? | 1,500 - 3,000 |
Belgium | ?? | 250 |
Bohemia | ?? | 1,000 - 2,000 |
Channel Islands | 66 | 66 - 80 |
Denmark | ?? | 1,000 |
England | 228 | 300 - 1,000 |
Estonia | 65 | 100 |
Finland | 115 | 115 |
France | 775 | 5,000 - 6,000 |
Germany | 8,188 | 17,324 - 26,000 |
Hungary | 449 | 800 |
Iceland | 22 | 22 |
Ireland | 4 | 4 - 10 |
Italy | 95 | 800 |
Latvia | ?? | 100 |
Luxembourg | 358 | 355 - 358 |
Netherlands | 203 | 203 - 238 |
Norway | 280 | 350 |
Poland | ??? | 1,000 - 5,000 |
Portugal | 7 | 7 |
Russia | 10 | 10 |
Scotland | 599 | 1,100 - 2,000 |
Spain | 6 | 40 - 50 |
Sweden | ?? | 200 - 250 |
Switzerland | 1,039 | 4,000 - 5,000 |
Grand Total: | 12,545 | 35,184 - 63,850 |
Assuming 40,000 executions over 250 years in Europe, which had a population of approximately 150 million at the time with a life expectancy of ca. 40 years, we get roughly one execution for witchcraft per 25,000 deaths, ranking about 3.5 times higher as cause of death than death by capital punishment (for any offense) in the U.S. in the late 20th century,[43] or roughly 5 times lower than death by capital punishment in the People's Republic of China.[44]
Protests
There have been contemporary protesters against witch trials and against use of torture.
- 643: The Edictum Rothari, the law code for Lombardy in Italy (‘Let nobody presume to kill a foreign serving maid or female slave as a witch, for it is not possible, nor ought to be believed by Christian minds')
- 672-754: Boniface of Mainz consistently denied the existence of witches, saying that to believe in them was unChristian
- 775-790: The First Synod of Saint Patrick declared that those who believed in witches are to be anathematized
- 785: Canon 6 of the Christian Council of Paderborn in Germany outlawed the belief in witches
- 9th century: French abbot Agobard of Lyons denied that any person could obtain or wield the power to fly, change shape, or cause bad weather, and argued that such claims were imagination and myth
- 906: In his work ‘A Warning To Bishops’, Abbot Regino of Prüm dismisses the popular beliefs in witches and witchcraft as complete fiction
- 936: Pope Leo VII wrote to Archbishop Gerhard of Lorch requiring him to instruct local authorities not to execute those accused of witchcraft
- The Canon Episcopi (10th century), denied the existence of witches, and considered the belief in witches to be heresy (it did not require any punishment of witches)
- 1020: Burchard, Bishop of Worms argued that witches had no power to fly, change people’s dispositions, control the weather, or transform themselves or anyone else, and denied the existence of incubi and succubi. He ruled that a belief in such things was a sin, and required priests to impose a strict penance on those who confessed to believing them
- 1080: Gregory VII wrote to King Harold of Denmark advising that those accused of supernaturally causing bad weather or epidemics should not be sentenced to death.
- Coloman, the Christian king of Hungary (11th century), passed a law declaring ‘Concerning witches, no such things exist, therefore no more investigations are to be held’ (’De strigis vero quae non sunt, nulla amplius quaestio fiat’)
- 1498: Although not denying the existence of witches, Ulrich Molitor an attorney in Constance wrote ‘Dialogus de lamiis et pythonibus mulieribus’, in which he deplored the methods of persecution and punishment inflicted on those accused of witchcraft
- Late 15th century: Antonino, Archbishop of Florence condemned the popular belief in witches, insisting that the powers attributed to them were impossible, and such beliefs were foolish.
- 1514: Alciatus, a civil legal official, was asked by a local prelate to assess the case of a number of women brought to trial for witchcraft. Expressing his belief that they were more in need of medicine than punishment, Alciatus advised against punishment and suggested they be treated kindly
- 1518-1520: As legal counsel to the city of Metz (Germany), French born Cornelius Agrippa successfully defended a local peasant woman from accusations of witchcraft
- 1540: Antonio Venegas de Figueroa, Bishop of Pamplona, sent a circular to the priests in his diocese, explaining that witchcraft was a false belief. He recommended medical treatment for those accused of witchcraft, and blamed the ignorance of the people for their confusion of witchcraft with medical conditions
- 1563: Johann Weyer, 'De praestigiis daemonum et incantationibus ac veneficiis'
- 1580: Frenchman Michel Eyquem de Montaigne objected to the persecution of witches, and expressed his scepticism that reports of witchcraft were ever true
- 1583: Protestant Johann Matthaus Meyfart condemns the inhuman treatment of those accused or convicted of witchcraft
- 1584: Reginald Scot, 'Discoverie of Witchcraft'
- 1592: Cornelius Loos, 'D vera et falsa magia'
- 1599: English Archbishop Samuel Harsnett condemned not only those who practiced fraudulent exorcisms, but also the very belief in witches and demons
- 1602: Anton Praetorius, Gründtlicher Bericht von Zauberey und Zauberern, 'Thorough Report on Witchcraft and Witches'
- 1610-1614: Alonso de Salazar y Frías, inquisitor reviewing the Logroño trials. His reports (1610-1614) led to the practical suppression of witch burnings in the Spanish empire one century before the rest of Europe[45].
- 1617: Adam Tanner, 'Disputationes'
- 1622: Johann Grevius, 'Tribunal Reformatum'
- 1631: Friedrich von Spee, 'Cautio Criminalis'
- 1651: The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes published ‘Leviathan, or The Matter, Forme and Power of a Common Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil’, in which he rejected the belief in witches and opposing witch hunts
- 1656: Englishman Thomas Ady published the first of three devastating works attacking beliefs in witches and witchcraft. He opposed the witch hunts vigorously
- 1669: John Wagstaffe published ‘The Question of Witchcraft Debated; or, a Discourse against their Opinions that affirm Witches’, opposing the witch hunts and declaring the belief in witchcraft to be superstition.
- 1676: John Webster published ‘The Displaying Of Supposed Witchcraft’, opposing the witch hunts and dismissing the belief in witches as superstition
- 1691: The Dutch theologian Balthasar Bekker published ‘Die Betooverde Wereld’, reprinted in English as ‘The World Bewitch’d’ (1695), an attack on the witch hunts and belief in witches
- 1693-1700: Robert Calef wrote repeatedly opposing the witch hunts
- 1712: An anonymous English physician published ‘A Full Confutation of Witchcraft, More particularly of the DEPOSITIONS Against JANE WENHAM, Lately Condemned for a WITCH; at Hertford’, opposing the witch hunts and the belief in witches
- 1718: Anglican clergyman Francis Hutchinson
- Christian Thomasius, De crimine magiae
- Hermann Adolph Meinders
- Hermann Löher, Hochnötige Unterthanige Wemütige Klage Der Frommen Unschültigen
End of the witch-trials in the 18th century
During early 18th century, the practice subsided. The last execution for witchcraft in England took place in 1716, when Mary Hicks and her daughter Elizabeth were hanged. Jane Wenham was among the last subjects of a typical witch trial in England in 1712, but was pardoned after her conviction and set free. The Witchcraft Act of 1734 saw the end of the traditional form of witchcraft as a legal offence in Britain, those accused under the new act were restricted to people who falsely pretended to be able to procure spirits, generally being the most dubious professional fortune tellers and mediums, and punishment was light.
Helena Curtens and Agnes Olmanns were the last women to be executed as witches in Germany, in 1738. In Austria, Maria Theresa outlawed witch-burning and torture in the late 18th century; the last capital trial took place in Salzburg in 1750. The last execution in Switzerland was that of Anna Göldi in 1782, whose execution was at the time widely denounced throughout Switzerland and Germany as state-sponsored murder. (Göldi's trial was not technically a "witch trial" since explicit allegations of witchcraft were avoided in the official trial.)
Modern witch-hunts
In some parts of the world, including South Africa and India, witch-hunts still occur to this day.[46][47][48][49]
Witch-hunts against children were reported by the BBC in 1999 in the Congo[50] and in Tanzania older women are killed as witches if they have red eyes.[51] A lawsuit was launched in 2001 in Ghana, where witch-hunts are also common, by a woman accused of being a witch.[51] Witch-hunts in Africa are often led by relatives seeking the property of the accused victim.
In December 1999 a student in Oklahoma, USA was suspended from school for 15 days for allegedly casting spells.[52]
Britain
There continued to be occasional prosecutions under the Witchcraft Act in the 19th and 20th century. The most well remembered is that of the medium Helen Duncan in 1944, the last person to be imprisoned under the Act. Supposedly the authorities feared that by her alleged clairvoyant powers she could betray details of the D-Day preparations, but the accusations in court centred round defrauding the public. She spent nine months in prison. The last conviction under the act was that of Jane Rebecca Yorke. The Act was repealed in 1951.
Africa
In many African societies the fear of witches drives periodic witchhunts during which specialist witch finders identify suspects, even today, with death by mobs often the result. Audrey I. Richards, in the journal Africa relates in 1935 an instance when a new wave of witchfinders, the Bamucapi, appeared in the villages of the Bemba people.[53] They dressed in European clothing, and would summon the headman to prepare a ritual meal for the village. When the villagers arrived they would view them all in a mirror, and claimed they could identify witches with this method. These witches would then have to "yield up his horns"; i.e. give over the horn containers for curses and evil potions to the witch-finders. The bamucapi then made all drink a potion called kucapa which would cause a witch to die and swell up if he ever tried such things again. The villagers related that the witchfinders were always right because the witches they found were always the people whom the village had feared all along. The bamucapi utilised a mixture of Christian and native religious traditions to account for their powers and said that God (not specifying which God) helped them prepare their medicine. In addition, all witches who did not attend the meal to be identified would be called to account later on by their master, who had risen from the dead, and who would force the witches by means of drums to go to the graveyard, where they would die. Richards noted that the bamucapi created the sense of danger in the villages by rounding up all the horns in the village, whether they were used for anti-witchcraft charms, potions, snuff or were indeed receptacles of black magic.
The Bemba people believed misfortunes such as hauntings and famines to be just actions sanctioned by the High-God Lesa. The only agency which caused unjust harm was a witch, who had enormous powers and was hard to detect. After white rule of Africa beliefs in sorcery and witchcraft grew, possibly because of the social strain caused by new ideas, customs and laws, and also because the courts no longer allowed witches to be tried.
Amongst the Bantu tribes of Southern Africa the witch smellers were responsible for detecting witches. In parts of Southern Africa several hundred people have been killed in witch hunts since 1990[54]
United States
Christian pastors occasionally call for a renewal of the so-called "burning times", to exterminate Wiccans and other Neopagans.
In August 1999, Rev. Jack Harvey, pastor of Tabernacle Independent Baptist Church in Killeen, TX allegedly arranged for at least one member of his church to carry a handgun during religious services, "in case a warlock tries to grab one of our kids...I've heard they drink blood, eat babies. They have fires, they probably cook them..." During speeches which preceded his church's demonstration against Wiccans, Rev. Harvey allegedly stated that the U.S. Army should napalm Witches. One of the Christian's signs read "Witchcraft is an abomination" on one side and "Burn the witches off Ft. Hood" on the other. A Wiccan faith group is active at Ft. Hood, a large army base near Killeen, TX.[55]
Causes and Sociology of witchhunts
One theory for the number of Early Modern witchcraft trials connects the counter-reformation to witchcraft. In south-western Germany between 1561 and 1670 there were 480 witch trials. Of the 480 trials that took place in southwestern Germany, 317 occurred in Catholic areas, while Protestant territories accounted for 163 of them.[56] During the period from 1561 to 1670, at least 3,229 persons were executed for witchcraft in the German Southwest. Of this number 702 were tried and executed in Protestant territories, while 2,527 were tried and executed in Catholic territories.[57] Nineteenth-century historians today dispute the comparative severity of witch hunting in Protestant and Catholic territories. “Protestants blamed the witch trials on the methods of the Catholic Inquisition and the theology of Catholic scholasticism, while Catholic scholars indignantly retorted that Lutheran preachers drew more witchcraft theory from Luther and the Bible than from medieval Catholic thinkers.”[58]
Other theories have pointed that the massive changes in law allowed for the outbreak in witch trials. Such laws pointed out heretical nature, and punished all aspects. Another theory is that rising number of devil literature popularized witchcraft trials, in which the German market saw nearly 100,000 devil-books during the 1560’s.[59] Another assumption is that climate-induced crop failure and harsh weather was a direct link to witch-hunts. This theory follows the idea that witchcraft in Europe was traditionally associated with weather-making.[60] Scholars also imply that a connection between witchcraft trials and the Thirty Years’ War may also have a direct correlation.[61]
While the previously mentioned theories mainly rely on micro level psychological interpretations, another theory has been put forward that provides an alternative macroeconomic explanation.[62] According to this theory, the witches, who often had highly developed midwifery skills, were prosecuted in order to extinguish knowledge about birth control in an effort to repopulate Europe after the population catastrophe triggered by the plague pandemic of the 14th century (also known as the Black Death).[63] Citing from Jean Bodin´s "On Witchcraft", this view holds that the witch hunts were not only promoted by the church but also by prominent secular thinkers to repopulate the European continent.[64] By these authors, the witch hunts are seen as an attempt to eliminate female midwifery skills and as a historical explanation why modern gynecology - surprisingly enough - came to be practiced almost exclusively by males in state run hospitals. In this view, the witch hunts began a process of criminalization of birth control that eventually lead to an enormous increase in birth rates that are described as the "population explosion" of early modern Europe. This population explosion produced an enormous youth bulge which supplied the extra manpower that would enable Europe's nations, during the period of colonialism and imperialism, to conquer and colonize 90% of the world.[65] While historians specializing in the history of the witch hunts have generally remained critical of this macroeconomic approach and continue to favor micro level perspectives and explanations[66], prominent historian of birth control John M. Riddle has expressed agreement.[67]
As this theory has an alternative macroeconomic explanation some scholars including Diane Purkiss discredit midwives and healers. Purkiss argues "that there is no evidence that the majority of those accused were healers and midwives; in England and also some parts of the Continent, midwives were more than likely to be found helping witch-hunters.[68] Also the fact remains that most women used herbal medicines as part of their household skills, and a large part of witches were accused by women.[69]
Some sociologists have attributed the occurrence of witchhunts to the prevalent human tendency to blame unexplainable occurrences on someone or something familiar. For example, Europe relied heavily upon agriculture during the period of the witch hunts; if there were large scale crop failures, the consequences would very likely be disastrous. Crop failures often correlated with the occurrence of witchhunts, leading some sociologists to suggest that communities often took out their anger about a lack of food on community members who were unpopular (witches.) This can be paralleled in more recent examples such as the Nazi use of anti-semitism to apportion blame for economic problems. A perception of moral righteousness, by the community, is a necessary element that enables rationalization. This, however, is only one element in a complex tapestry of factors leading to the events in question.
The modern notion of a "witchhunt" has little to do with gender, the historical notion often did. In general, supposed "witches" were female. Noted Judge Nicholas Rémy (c.1595), "[It is] not unreasonable that this scum of humanity, [witches], should be drawn chiefly from the feminine sex." Concurred another judge, "The Devil uses them so, because he knows that women love carnal pleasures, and he means to bind them to his allegiance by such agreeable provocations."[70]
In Neopaganism and feminism
The term "the burning times" was a term used by Gerald Gardner in 1954[71] as a reference to the European and North American witch trials. Gardner claimed his Wicca was based on an ancient tradition of witchcraft; the "burning times" were its period of greatest persecution, and a major reason for the secrecy maintained within the religion ever since. His account relied heavily on the theories of Margaret Murray, now regarded as highly flawed; he also repeated the figure of nine million casualties first derived by an antiquarian at Quedlinburg, Germany, through the false extrapolation of local records, and repeated by various German and English historians, notably the 19th century women's rights campaigner Matilda Joslyn Gage.[72][73] This figure is now known to be a massive overestimate, about a hundred times the estimates of most modern researchers.[74] While Gardner referred to the witch hunts in general as "the burning times", he noted that burning was only practiced on the Continent and in Scotland; in England accused witches were hanged.[75]
Modern historians agree the witchhunts had little to do with persecuting a pagan cult, but were largely the result of an interplay of a series of complex historical and societal factors.
It is probable that the majority of the accused identified as Christian.[76] Generally accepted casualty figures amongst historians are also dramatically lower, ranging from Levack at around 60,000 to Hutton at around 40,000; the entire adult female population in Europe at the time was no more than 20-22 million.[77] Victims of the witchhunt were not always female, though women were the majority. In some countries, especially in Scandinavia, the majority of the accused were male; in Finland some 70% and in Iceland almost 80% of the accused were men.[citation needed] However taking Europe as a whole between 1450 and 1700, only 20-25% of those accused were males.[citation needed] Misogyny is usually considered an important factor in the witch-hunts, along with social unrest and religious conflicts between Protestants and Catholics.
Most contemporary practitioners of Wicca and related Neo-Pagan religions no longer subscribe to Gardner's or Margaret Murray's theories, and see Wicca as a modern development based on a variety of sources, rather than an unbroken tradition dating from ancient times. They believe that their religion is no less valid because of its recent inception.
The term The Burning Times was further popularised by Mary Daly in her 1978 book, Gyn/Ecology: The Meta-Ethics of Radical Feminism, who maintained that the trials were fundamentally a persecution of women by patriarchy; she expanded the term's meaning to include not only the witch-hunts but the "entire patriarchal rule". Neo-Pagan author Starhawk subsequently introduced the term into her book The Spiral Dance in 1979. The term was adopted by various American feminist historians and popularised in the 1970s for all historical persecution of witches and pagans, again often quoting nine million casualties. They also referred to it as the Women's Holocaust.[78]
Political Usage
In modern terminology 'witch-hunt' has acquired usage referring to the act of seeking and persecuting any perceived enemy, particularly when the search is conducted using extreme measures and with little regard to actual guilt or innocence.
Homage to Catalonia
The Oxford English Dictionary describes the first recorded use of the term in its metaphorical sense in George Orwell's Homage to Catalonia (1938). The term is used by Orwell to describe how, in the Spanish Civil War, political persecutions became a regular occurrence.
The Crucible
The term 'witch-hunt' was popularized in this context through Arthur Miller's play The Crucible, ostensibly about the Salem witch trials, but actually a criticism of the McCarthy hearings as well as the general atmosphere of paranoia and persecution that accompanied them.[79]
Labeled as Witchhunts
McCarthyism The most famous 'witch hunt' of the 20th century is perhaps the McCarthy Era of 1950-1954, in which Senator Joseph McCarthy accused many American citizens of being Communists or Communist sympathizers, and hearings were held by anti-Communist committees, panels and "loyalty review boards" across the United States. These hearings, later deemed unconstitutional, resulted in ostracism, ruined careers or even imprisonment for tens of thousands, and represent a major breakdown in civil liberties and civil discourse.
Political Confirmation Process The term has also been used to describe allegedly harsh treatment or investigations of those undergoing the political confirmation process of U.S. presidential appointees.
Involuntary Commitment The practice of involuntary commitment has been described as a witch-hunt, with systematic bias in the standards for involuntary commitment, the search for people to involuntarily commit, and the judicial procedures that may result in their commitment. [citation needed]
See also
- Christian views on witchcraft
- European witchcraft
- Trial by ordeal
- Pierre de Lancre (conductor of a bloody witch-hunt in Labourd)
- Salem witch trials
- Torsåker witch trials
- Basque witch trials
- Würzburg witch trial
- Ramsele witch trial
- North Berwick witch trials
- Bideford witch trial
- Parma witch hunt
- Blood libel
References
- ^ International Standard Bible Encyclopedia article on Witchcraft, last accessed 31 March 2006. There is some discrepancy between translations; compare with that given in the Catholic Encyclopedia article on Witchcraft (accessed 31 March 2006), and the L. W. King translation (accessed 31 March 2006)
- ^ "witch" here translates the Hebrew מכשפה, and is rendered φαρμακός in the Septuagint.
- ^ "those that have familiar spirits": Hebrew אוב, or ἐγγαστρίμυθος "ventriloquist, soothsayer" in the Septuagint; "wizards": Hebrew ידעני or γνώστης "diviner" in the Septuagint.
- ^ Jordanes. The Origin and Deeds of the Goths. pp. § 24.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/560-975dooms.html
- ^ a b Jenny Gibbons (1998). Recent Developments in the Study of The Great European Witch Hunt. Retrieved 12 June 2006.
- ^ a b Culianu, Ioan Petru. "The Witch and the Trickstress in Dire Straits. Part I - The Witch: who did the hunting and who put an end to it?", conference held at Chicago University 1986-05-05, transcribed in Template:Ro icon, Antohi, Sorin; Antohi, Mona (eds.), Popescu, Cornelia (transl.) (2002). Jocurile Minţii. Polirom Publishing House, pp. 191-219. ISBN 973-683-910-9
- ^ H.C. Erik Midelfort, Witch Hunting in Southwestern Germany 1562-1684,1972,71
- ^ Wolfgang Behringer, Witches and Witch-Hunts,2004,83
- ^ John H. Langbein, Torture and the Law of Proof (Chicago and London, 1977), p.81ff.
- ^ Brian Levack, The Witch-Hunt in Early Modern Europe (2nd ed, 1995), p.202; see also Christina Larner, Enemies of God. The Witch-hunt in Scotland (London, 1981), pp.62-3
- ^ A detailed account of Hopkins and his fellow witchfinder John Stearne can be found in Malcolm Gaskill's Witchfinders: A Seventeenth Century English Tragedy (Harvard, 2005). The duo's activities were portrayed, unreliably but entertainingly, in the 1968 cult classic Conqueror Worm (US: Witchfinder-General).
- ^ Brain P. Levack, The witch hunt in early modern Europe, Second Edition (London and New York: Longman Publisher, 1995) 64-67.
- ^ Brain P. Levack, The witch hunt in early modern Europe, Second Edition (London and New York: Longman Publisher, 1995) 64-67.
- ^ Brain P. Levack, The Witch Hunts in Early Modern Europe, page 38
- ^ Wallace Notestein, A History Witchcraft in England From 1558 to 1712, page 98
- ^ Linda Alchin, “Elizabethan Superstitions.” Elizabethan Period, http://www.elizabethan-era.org.uk/elizabethan-superstitions.htm (accessed November 2, 2007).
- ^ Brain P. Levack, The witch hunt in early modern Europe, Second Edition (London and New York: Longman Publisher, 1995), 117.here
- ^ Alan Macfarlane, Witchcraft in Tudor and Stuart England A regional and Comparative Study (New York and Evanston: Harper & Row Publishers, 1970), 20.
- ^ Alan Macfarlane, Witchcraft in Tudor and Stuart England A regional and Comparative Study (New York and Evanston: Harper & Row Publishers, 1970), 20.
- ^ Alan Macfarlane, Witchcraft in Tudor and Stuart England A regional and Comparative Study (New York and Evanston: Harper & Row Publishers, 1970), 87.
- ^ Robert H. West, Reginald Scot and Renaissance Writings (Boston,: Twayne Publishers, 1984), 102.
- ^ K.M Briggs, Pale Hecate’s Team, an Examination of the Beliefs on Witchcraft and Magic among Shakespeare’s Contemporaries and His Immediate Successors, page 31.
- ^ Brian P. Levack, "The Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661-1662" in The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1. (Autumn, 1980), 91-96. (Accessed from JSTOR on October 9, 2007)
- ^ Brian P. Levack, The Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661-1662, page 95
- ^ Brian P. Levack, “The Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661-1662.” The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1. (Autumn, 1980), 91-96. (Accessed form JSTOR on October 9, 2007)
- ^ Brian P. Levack, “The Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661-1662.” The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1. (Autumn, 1980), 97-101. (Accessed form JSTOR on October 9, 2007)
- ^ Brian P. Levack, “The Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661-1662.” The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1. (Autumn, 1980), 97-101. (Accessed form JSTOR on October 9, 2007)
- ^ Brian P. Levack, The Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661-1662, page 98
- ^ Carol F. Karlsen, The Devil in the Shape of a Woman: Witchcraft in Colonial New England (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1998), 156
- ^ Brian P. Levack, “The Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661-1662.” The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1. (Autumn, 1980), 97-101. (Accessed form JSTOR on October 9, 2007)
- ^ Brian P. Levack, “The Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661-1662.” The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1. (Autumn, 1980), 97-101. (Accessed form JSTOR on October 9, 2007)
- ^ At The Bottom of the Garden, Dark History of Fairies, Hobgoblins, and Other Troublesome Things. By Diane Purkiss, Page 88
- ^ At The Bottom of the Garden, Dark History of Fairies, Hobgoblins, and Other Troublesome Things. By Diane Purkiss, Page 89
- ^ Wallace Notestein, A History Witchcraft in England From 1558 to 1712 (New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company, 1968), 18-21.
- ^ Barstow, Anne Llewellyn (1994) Witchcraze: A New History of the European Witch Hunts San Francisco:Pandora. p. 23
- ^ a b Gibbons, Jenny (1998) "Recent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Hunt" in The Pomegranate #5, Lammas 1998.
- ^ Madar, Maia. Estonia I: Werewolves and Poisoners. pp. 257-272
- ^ Barstow, Anne Llewellyn (1994) Witchcraze: A New History of the European Witch Hunts San Francisco:Pandora.
- ^ See Keith Evans' Religion and the Decline of Magic, first published in 1973.
- ^ on the "nine million" number often repeated in popular culture see below, and Template:De icon Behringer, Wolfgang: Neun Millionen Hexen. Enstehung, Tradition und Kritik eines populären Mythos, in: Geschichte in Wissenschaft und Unterricht 49. 1987, pp. 664-685, extensive summary on [1]
- ^ "Estimates of executions". Based on Ronald Hutton's essay Counting the Witch Hunt.
- ^ 1057 executions over 30 years, compared to some 90 million deaths over the same period.
- ^ an estimated 4,000 executions per year, with a population of 1.2 billion with a life expectancy of ca. 73 years.
- ^ SALAZAR Y FRÍAS, Alonso de, article by Ainhoa Arozamena Ayala for the Spanish-language Auñamendi Encyclopedia
- ^ "Africa: South Africa: Homes Burned In Witch Hunt", The New York Times 26 February 2005.
- ^ Witch Hunts in Africa
- ^ Four tribals held for killing 'sorcerer', The Hindu 4 December 2000. Retrieved 1 September 2006.
- ^ Women branded 'witches' to settle scores, The Asia Times 23 February 2000. Retrieved 1 September 2006.
- ^ "Congo witch-hunt's child victims". BBC News. 1999-12-22. Retrieved 2007-04-16.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ a b "Tanzania arrests 'witch killers'". BBC News. 2003-10-23. Retrieved 2007-04-16.
It is believed that any aged, old woman with red eyes is a witch
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ ACLU of Oklahoma Files Federal Lawsuit on Behalf of Student Accused of "Hexing" a Teacher
- ^ A Modern Movement of Witch Finders Audrey I Richards (Africa: Journal of the International Institute of African Languages and Cultures, Ed. Diedrich Westermann.) Vol VIII, 1935, published by Oxford University Press, London
- ^ Christian responses to witchcraft and sorcery
- ^ Barry Shlachter, "Bothered and bewildered; Wiccans at Hood shrug off media hubbub," Fort Worth Star Telegram, Aug. 7, 1999.
- ^ H.C. Erik Midelfort, Witch Hunting in Southwestern Germany 1562-1684,1972,31
- ^ H.C. Erik Midelfort, Witch Hunting in Southwestern Germany 1562-1684,1972,31-32
- ^ H.C. Erik Midelfort, Witch Hunting in Southwestern Germany 1562-1684,1972,31
- ^ H.C. Erik Midelfort, Witch Hunting in Southwestern Germany 1562-1684,1972,69-0
- ^ Wolfgang Behringer, Witches and Witch-Hunts,2004,88
- ^ H.C. Erik Midelfort, Witch Hunting in Southwestern Germany 1562-1684,1972
- ^ Gunnar Heinsohn/Otto Steiger: "Witchcraft, Population Catastrophe and Economic Crisis in Renaissance Europe: An Alternative Macroeconomic Explanation.", University of Bremen 2004 (download)
- ^ Gunnar Heinsohn/Otto Steiger: The Elimination of Medieval Birth Control and the Witch Trials of Modern Times, International Journal of Women's Studies, 3, May 1982, 193-214
- ^ Gunnar Heinsohn/Otto Steiger: "Birth Control: The Political-Economic Rationale Behind Jean Bodin's "Démonomanie"", in: History of Political Economy, 31, No. 3, 423-448
- ^ Heinsohn, G.(2005): "Population, Conquest and Terror in the 21st Century." [2]
- ^ Walter Rummel: 'Weise' Frauen und 'weise' Männer im Kampf gegen Hexerei. Die Widerlegung einer modernen Fabel. In: Christof Dipper, Lutz Klinkhammer und Alexander Nützenadel: Europäische Sozialgeschichte. Festschrift für Wolfgang Schieder (= Historische Forschungen 68), Berlin 2000, S. 353-375, [3]
- ^ see John M. Riddle: "The Great Witch-Hunt and the Suppression of Birth Control: Heinsohn and Steiger's Theory from the Perspective of an Historian", Appendix to: Gunnar Heinsohn/Otto Steiger: "Witchcraft, Population Catastrophe and Economic Crisis in Renaissance Europe: An Alternative Macroeconomic Explanation.", University of Bremen 2004(download); also see John M. Riddle: "Eve's Herbs: A History of Contraception and Abortion in the West", Princeton: Harvard University Press 1999, ISBN-10: 0674270266, esp. Chapters 5-7
- ^ Diane Purkiss, "A Holocaust of one's own," 8
- ^ Diane Purkis, "A Holocaust of one's own," 8
- ^ Klaits, Joseph — Servants of Satan: The Age of the Witch Hunts (1985) p.68
- ^ Gardner, Gerald (1954). Witchcraft Today. pp. p. 139.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Gage, Matilda Joslyn (1893). Woman, Church and State.
- ^ Poole, Robert (ed.) (2003) The Lancashire Witches: Histories and Stories. Manchester: Manchester University Press. ISBN 0719062047. p. 192.
- ^ Hutton, Ronald. Triumph of the Moon. pp. p. 141.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Template:De icon Behringer, Wolfgang: Neun Millionen Hexen. Enstehung, Tradition und Kritik eines populären Mythos, in: Geschichte in Wissenschaft und Unterricht 49. 1987, pp. 664-685, extensive summary on [4] - ^ Witchcraft Today p. 52.
- ^ Keith Thomas 514-7, Hutton passim.
- ^ [5] European population, 16th century.
- ^ See Hutton, Ronald. Triumph of the Moon. chapter 18 for his exploration of their ideas.
- ^ Arthur Miller, 'Why I Wrote "The Crucible"', New Yorker, October 21 & October 28, 1996, p.158.
Further reading
- Behringer, Wolfgang. Witches and Witch Hunts: A Global History. Malden Massachusetts: Polity Press, 2004.
- Briggs, Robin. 'Many reasons why': witchcraft and the problem of multiple explanation, in Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe. Studies in Culture and Belief, ed. Jonathan Barry, Marianne Hester, and Gareth Roberts, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
- Midlefort, Erick H.C. Witch Hunting in Southeastern Germany 1562-1684: The Social and Intellectual Foundation. California: Stanford University Press, 1972. ISBN 0804708053
- Oberman, H. A., J. D. Tracy, Thomas A. Brady (eds.), Handbook of European History, 1400-1600: Visions, Programs, Outcomes (1995) ISBN 9004097619
- Oldridge, Darren (ed.), The Witchcraft Reader (2002) ISBN 0415214920
- Poole, Robert. The Lancashire Witches: Histories and Stories (2002) ISBN 0719062047
- Purkiss, Diane. "A Holocaust of One's Own: The Myth of the Burning Times." Chapter in The Witch and History: Early Modern and Twentieth Century Representatives New York, NY: Routledge, 1996, pp. 7-29.
- Sagan, Carl. The Demon-Haunted World, Random House, 1996. ISBN 039453512X
- Thurston, Robert. The Witch Hunts: A History of the Witch Persecutions in Europe and North America. Pearson/Longman, 2007.
- Purkiss, Diane. The Bottom of the Garden, Dark History of Fairies, Hobgoblins, and Other Troublesome Things. Chapter 3 Brith and Death: Fairies in Scottish Witch-trials New York, NY: New York University Press, 2000, pp. 85-115.
- Levack, Brian P. The Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661-1662''The Journal of British
Studies,Vol.20, No, 1. (Autumn, 1980), pp. 90-108.
- Levack, Brain P. The witch hunt in early modern Europe, Second Edition. London andNew York: Longman Publisher, 1995.
- Macfarlane, Alan. Witchcraft in Tudor and Stuart England A regional and Comparative Study. New York and Evanston: Harper & Row Publishers, 1970.
- West, Robert H. Reginald Scot and Renaissance Writings. Boston: Twayne Publishers,1984.
- Briggs, K.M. Pale Hecate’s Team, an Examination of the Beliefs on Witchcraft and Magic among Shakespeare’s Contemporaries and His Immediate Successors. New York: The Humanities Press, 1962.
External links
- The Stages of a Witch Trial — a series of articles by Jenny Gibbons.
- 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia entry on "Witchcraft"
- The Burning Times A Wiccan discusses what she considers the three myths of "The Burning Times"
- Jenny Gibbons (1998). [6]. Retrieved 21 November 2006.
- Crises: Witch hunt
- The Decline and End of Witch Trials in Europe by James Hannam
- Witch Trials Documentary Archive and Transcription Project
- Witch Trials
- Dame Alice le Kyteler, convicted of witchcraft in Kilkenny, Ireland, 1324
- [Elizabethan Superstitions in the Elizabethan Period ]by Linda Alchin