→Devoke Water: Reply Tag: Reply |
→April 2023: new section Tag: New topic |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Thanks for spotting that Pam! Easily done [[User:A.D.Hope|A.D.Hope]] ([[User talk:A.D.Hope#top|talk]]) 18:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC) |
:Thanks for spotting that Pam! Easily done [[User:A.D.Hope|A.D.Hope]] ([[User talk:A.D.Hope#top|talk]]) 18:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC) |
||
== April 2023 == |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Duke of Lancaster]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about [[WP:EPTALK|how this is done]]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> |
|||
:'''Note''': You need to be aware your first edit on the article today constitutes your first revert for 3RR. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa|talk]]) 17:11, 26 April 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:11, 26 April 2023
You left this as a puddle under 4 ft long! Always worth checking ones edits. I hope I guessed right that you meant it to be 1.17km long. Happy Editing. PamD 17:59, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for spotting that Pam! Easily done A.D.Hope (talk) 18:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
April 2023
![Stop icon](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history at Duke of Lancaster shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
- Note: You need to be aware your first edit on the article today constitutes your first revert for 3RR. DeCausa (talk) 17:11, 26 April 2023 (UTC)