Content deleted Content added
Kirill Lokshin (talk | contribs) |
Newyorkbrad (talk | contribs) →Liancourt Rocks article probation: vote, comment |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:Support: |
:Support: |
||
:# [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill]] 22:53, 6 January 2008 (UTC) |
:# [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill]] 22:53, 6 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
:# See [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Liancourt Rocks]] for background. This expansion of the remedies appears to be necessary in view of subsequent events currently being discussed on ANI [[WP:ANI#Liancourt Rocks|here]]. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad|talk]]) 23:07, 6 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Oppose: |
:Oppose: |
Revision as of 23:07, 6 January 2008
On this page, Arbitrators propose motions in prior (already-closed) cases, or motions in lieu of full cases. The majority (i.e., the number required to pass the motion) is the number of active Arbitrators listed as active, less those who recused themselves from the relevant case. Only Arbitrators may vote on such motions.
Liancourt Rocks article probation
The Liancourt Rocks article is placed on article probation. Editors making disruptive edits may be banned from the article and its talk page by any uninvolved administrator. Any editor that continues to edit in violation of such a ban may be blocked, for up to a year in the event of repeated violations. All blocks are to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Liancourt Rocks#Log of blocks and bans.
- Support:
- Kirill 22:53, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Liancourt Rocks for background. This expansion of the remedies appears to be necessary in view of subsequent events currently being discussed on ANI here. Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:07, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose:
- Abstain: