Content deleted Content added
→Bower: fiddle. fiddle. |
Drivenmadness (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
__NOTOC__ |
__NOTOC__ |
||
== Abecedarian == |
== Abecedarian == |
Revision as of 06:14, 12 February 2010
Abecedarian
(ay-bee-see-DAYR-ee-uhn)
noun
- One who is learning the alphabet.
- One who teaches the alphabet.
- One who is a beginner in some field.
adjective
- Alphabetically arranged.
- Relating to the alphabet.
- Rudimentary
And what, say, would abecedarians think of Wikipedia ?!
Articles created
- Manjeera
- Hindu iconography
- Alice Stewart Trillin
- Behind the Scenes (US TV series)
- Mina P. Shaughnessy
- Prevention of Terrorism Act, India
- Suzanne Labin
- Bibliography of Hindu scriptures
- Shubha Raul
- The Jaguar Smile
- CIA's family jewels
- Dineshchandra Sircar
- A Vedic Word Concordance
- Baba (honorific)
- Sadhana (weekly)
- W. Norman Brown
- 2009 Nobel Peace Prize
- Uploaded Images
Hidden to prevent theft or fading
|
---|
|
Wikiphilosophy or: how I learned to stop worrying and love the trolls
- What we are building here ? Encylopedia of everything
- How we are building it ? With persistence
- Who's building it ? Uhh ...
But why should I contribute to an article? I'm no expert.
That's fine. The Wikipedia philosophy can be summed up thusly: "Experts are scum." For some reason people who spend 40 years learning everything they can about, say, the Peloponnesian War -- and indeed, advancing the body of human knowledge -- get all pissy when their contributions are edited away by Randy in Boise who heard somewhere that sword-wielding skeletons were involved. And they get downright irate when asked politely to engage in discourse with Randy until the sword-skeleton theory can be incorporated into the article without passing judgment.
Subpages
- Administratory
- Maleabroad - tracking socks of user (defunct)
- Sandbox (empty)