new discussion to the *bottom* of the page |
→Standard for including Alberta in place name: new section |
||
Line 361: | Line 361: | ||
Just a comment; you don't really need to tag an article for improvement when it's been blanked as a copyright violation - it'll be deleted or restored/rewritten with all of the old categories and links (or maintenance tags other people already put on it before it was blanked). [[User:VernoWhitney|VernoWhitney]] ([[User talk:VernoWhitney|talk]]) 20:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC) |
Just a comment; you don't really need to tag an article for improvement when it's been blanked as a copyright violation - it'll be deleted or restored/rewritten with all of the old categories and links (or maintenance tags other people already put on it before it was blanked). [[User:VernoWhitney|VernoWhitney]] ([[User talk:VernoWhitney|talk]]) 20:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Standard for including Alberta in place name == |
|||
Hello again. |
|||
I hope it is not too much of a bother, but I was hoping you could chime in on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alberta#Standard for including Alberta in place name]], because it involves moves only an administrator can do, and none of the current commenters are admins. Thanks, [[User:117Avenue|117Avenue]] ([[User talk:117Avenue|talk]]) 05:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:17, 4 September 2010
Please post new comments at the bottom of this page, not at the top.
Troublesome user
I noticed that you have had some interaction with LAVINA4194 (talk · contribs). In addition to the problems you have warned him about, I would like to point out that all of the pages he has created about Ohio politicians are referenced using a Google books search link that does not result in a page that verifies the information provided in the article. I have mentioned this on the user's talk page, but I thought you might like to keep an eye on the situation. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:41, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Sylvia Jones
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Sylvia Jones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
{{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Mcmatter (talk|contrib) 20:06, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- sorry I removed the Copyvio instead- Mcmatter (talk|contrib) 20:22, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Marking things as Uncategorized
I noticed that you're using AWB to "categorize" articles. For some reason, you're tagging a bunch of articles that do have categories (for example Bijou (cocktail)) as uncategorized. Is this a fault of AWB, a mistake on your part, or me misunderstanding something? Qwyrxian (talk) 08:44, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed, you are ignoring categories that are added with a template, such as a stub template. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 02:20, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
- To cite another example, see IBM 2821 Control Unit. Please either fix or stop running AWB. John Sauter (talk) 02:37, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- In case anyone else has this same problem and sees this topic, here is Bearcat's response from my Talk page: “An article is not considered to be "categorized" just because it has a stub template on it, because stub templates are for maintenance purposes and are meant to be removed as soon as the article is no longer of stub length. An article is correctly tagged as being uncategorized, no matter how many stub "categories" are present, if it doesn't also have at least one real, permanent content category on it in addition to the stub templates.” John Sauter (talk) 13:51, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Creed of the United States Coast Guardsman
Your deletion of the article Creed of the United States Coast Guardsman is erroneous. This material is property of the Federal Government and was written by VADM Harry G. Hamlet for use by the United States Coast Guard. It is available on the web at this official Coast Guard website. Your deletion did not give me the courtesy of a notice on the page requesting a deletion or a chance to rebut your actions. The website that I reference here was a part of the references noted in the article and had you bothered to follow the link you would see that the use of the Creed is legitimate under public ownership. As such it is not copywritable. I request that you reverse you deletion of the article and in the future be just a little more careful before pulling the plug. Thank you for your cooperation in the correction of this error Cuprum17 (talk) 17:13, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
- I have to second that. I saw your response, where you cited that it was merely a text dump. That may or may not be true, but it is not a valid speedy deletion criteria; the one you gave was a copyright violation, but there is no copyright on public domain works. I request that you undelete the article and prod or place it at AfD if you still feel the same way; this should have a chance to go through the proper avenues. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 20:52, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
sorry
hi im sorry because of bad word...
sorry
hi im sorry because of bad word... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirhasanov (talk • contribs) 23:57, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:King Records albums
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f4/Info_talk.png/36px-Info_talk.png)
Category:King Records albums, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:35, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, just wondered what the reason was for removing South Wales Valleys from Category:Geography of Wales. Daicaregos (talk) 22:51, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Daicaregos (talk) 06:43, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Sudbury Mayors
Dear Bearcat Thank you for explaining the naming convention. I appreciate the feed back. I look forward to hearing from you again.
Adam —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam C Toews (talk • contribs) 09:41, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Barb Higgins Deletion
Hi, I noticed that on July 31 you deleted the Page "Barb Higgins" for the reason (A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content). I would like to ask that you reconsider this deletion as Ms. Higgins is currently a candidate for mayor of Calgary and according to two recent polls she is the frontrunner (http://www.globaltvcalgary.com/Calgarians+putting+their+support+behind+upcoming+Civic+Election/3337533/story.html). As the Mayoral election approaches voters will be looking to Wikipedia for information on the candidates, and many of the others have active pages. If she wins, which appears likely, we will certainly want to have a municipal politics page on her. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lola60311 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Michael Laxer article deletion debate
Hi Bearcat:
The Michael Laxer is being proposed for deletion [[1]]. He is a current political candidate in the Toronto municipal elections, for city councillor in Ward 6, Etobicoke Lakeshore. Could you please put a stop to this, until at least after the October 25th election. The article is of course, as usual in many of these cases, poorly written.--Abebenjoe (talk) 16:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Red algae category
I see you categorized at least two red algae articles (Peyssonnelia and Cruoriopsis) into Category:Eukaryotes. As far as I can tell, they should instead be in a subcategory of that category, presumably Category:Red algae. I mention this in case there are other articles affected by this. Kingdon (talk) 20:17, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
United Kingdom and Great Britain
Hi Bearcat
In this edit, you added Category:Members of the United Kingdom Parliament for English constituencies to a person who died in 1797. I have replaced this with Category:Members of the Parliament of Great Britain for English constituencies because he could not actually have been a member of the Parliament of the United Kingdom; in his lifetime the Parl at Westminster was the Parliament of Great Britain.The United Kingdom Parliament was not created until 1801.
HTH! --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:50, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Massive redaction of Core synchronism article
Bearcat, based on what criteria did you delete nearly all of the content and references for the Core synchronism article? You wrote that what you did was merely categorization/tagging/cleanup, but a much more systematic removal seems to be at play. Nothing untrue was stated in the article as it existed before your edit. It spoke of models and views which you might not agree with, but a number of people do. Is that legitimate cause for removing nearly everything? Did you mean to delete nearly everything or just to add an opposing viewpoint? The latter seems appropriate and, in my understanding, in the spirit of the wikipedia undertaking.
Dln108 (talk) 23:33, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry about that misunderstanding, Bearcat. I misread the history. What is best etiquette for my mis-allocation of that action to you? Just delete that paragraph above? Dln108 (talk) 02:31, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Kim Hughes (radio)
I have nominated Kim Hughes (radio), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Hughes (radio). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. J04n(talk page) 12:23, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Mozilla Drumbeat article deletion
Hi Bearcat, I disagree on the deletion of the Drumbeat article. I believe the stub should be expanded instead of deleting it. Drumbeat is growing in importance with both local events (like two months ago in Paris, and in three months in Barcelona) and growing community (promoted by Drumbeat grants and hosting of multiple projects).--Samer.hc (talk) 22:12, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Donnelly and Cooper
I am confused. Complete lyrics are found in a great majority of the articles in the same category. What about the complete lyrics for "God Save the Queen" or the feature article "Amazing Grace", should they be removed, too? I am new and was just trying to emulate similar articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colemcginnis (talk • contribs) 04:26, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Tagging
Every single individual season redirect contained within Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens football, 1889–1899 is already categorized, so please stop adding the {{uncategorized}} tag to it. Jrcla2 (talk) 04:33, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Categorization
Thanks for correcting me to use the right categorization on biography pages. What template should be placed on their Talk pages? Critisizer (talk) 04:14, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
US Open
it'll eventually be created I'm sure, so I don't see any reason why it cann't be included at this moment, especially since we're about 2 weeks away from the US Open. Afro (Say Something Funny) - Afkatk 14:58, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Request
Since the Michael Laxer article has been deleted, would it be possible for you to replace it with a redirect to New_Democratic_Party_candidates,_2003_Ontario_provincial_election#Michael_Laxer_.28Scarborough_Centre.29? Thanks. 70.55.218.131 (talk) 18:20, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
New Stuff
Been a long time since I made myself known on this talk page, but I just uploaded a new screenshot (and subsequently added a new article). Maybe you can help solve some slight hiccups. Maple Leaf fan '04 (talk) 19:39, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Sorry about that. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:52, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Category tag
Hiya. I see you've been an admin. for a number of years, so you'll know this WP thing well.
You added this tag to an article which already had several categories. May I ask why you did so?
I added another category & removed your tag. Was I right to remove the tag? Thanks, Trafford09 (talk) 10:08, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation on my talk page. I see now. Trafford09 (talk) 16:51, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Archives
Me again. I was wondering about archives of talk pages. I archive mine, & it appears that most people do.
It seems you as an admin. choose not to. What advice would you offer to a person considering whether they should/shouldn't archive their talk page? Thanks, Trafford09 (talk) 10:12, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notes on my talk page. Best, Trafford09 (talk) 16:52, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Jake Dinwiddie
Hello from Spain,can you put a photo of this boy in his article of wikipedia? Other thing, could you write the article of Jake Dinwiddie in spanish wikipedia? Thanks you :)
Húsasmiðjan and Categorization
Thank you, Bearcat, for your courteous critique :) I thought that the stub template assigned an article to a category automatically, as a category was then displayed at the bottom of the text where there was none before. Shows what I know; I'm more of a Wikipedia angel or whatever you call us; I do little things that I hope mean something. I'll cease with pulling the category tags, though, and thanks again for the education :) Best to ya! Cesium_133 (talk) 06:12, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Get Low (film) reference contents
Hi Bearcat,
I noticed there were only a handful of references/external links about Get Low, the Sony Pictures Classics small budget film currently in release.
There is a video editorial online on Get Low that may interest Wikipedia in referencing the content.
http://midnighttracks.net/2010/getlowvid
Hope this helps in some way. I left a similar message to some of the original crew members that created the Get Low wikipedia page in the hopes this would be discussed and then unanimous action is taken.
CinemaFanCA
--76.170.118.23 (talk) 07:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Bearcat! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 86 of the articles that you created are currently tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 729 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Peter Prilesnik - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Craig Halket - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Elizabeth Gray - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Gordon Graydon (Alberta politician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Michelle McAdorey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Ray Hunter - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Anne Loree - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Bill Brewster (politician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Fred Bradshaw - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Judy Bradley
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Deletion Notice
Just in case you're interested, there is a speedy deletion notice for Bruce and Pepper Wayne Gacy's Home Movies by Bruce LaBruce and Candy Parker, which will probably result in a deletion debate. If this is something you might want to express an opinion about, I understand there is a limited time frame (7 days?) in which to do so. I am not sure if it is now against the rules to let others know about deletion notices; there are so many new rules and regulations since the days when I regularly edited here that I hope I haven't done anything wrong, and hope it's ok to let you know about this! Intheshadows (talk) 06:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Category:Hawaii
I do not agree with the removal of top level articles from top level categories. For the most part, these types of changes have been made unilaterally without discussion by one editor, who has forced their poor categorization to the detriment of editors and readers alike. I will therefore be restoring these categories, not because I like or prefer them, but because the reader benefits from having top level subjects in the base category. Viriditas (talk) 04:59, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- An article is not supposed to be filed in Category:Hawaii if it's already in one or more subcategories such as Category:History of Hawaii or Category:Geography of Hawaii. There is no benefit to the reader in duplicate categorization. Bearcat (talk) 05:02, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- There is no such rule. A misguided editor who felt that top level articles should never appear in duplicate or higher categories removed them all against the wishes of other editors. The fact is, top level categorization has always been acceptable and the reader greatly benefits from browsing and viewing the top level articles at the base, giving them a quick visual overview of the subject. This is academic. If you don't see or understand the benefit then it's because you aren't looking at this as a reader. Part of the problem here is a narrow approach to editing that fails to understand the different types if editors who use this site and the different ways they view and browse categories. I would be happy go explain this to you in more detail later, as I'm on a cell phone at the moment. Viriditas (talk) 05:12, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
I am experimenting with an active form of dispute resolution that involves putting forward a compromise that both of us can accept as a short-term solution. It occurs to me that I can get the same desired result from simply adding a list of top level articles to the header of the category page as I would get from adding an actual category. Would you have an objection to this compromise? In other words, if you find it acceptable, I would link to the articles in the heading of Category:Hawaii in a clearly descriptive way, while reverting to your version of the article pages without the category. If this is acceptable to you, let me know. Viriditas (talk) 10:16, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Bearcat, I am an user from German Wikipedia, and I work with the "fine arts" - team there. The page Bodo Sperling in German WP was made as a self promotion and it is still continued. So we have a special eye on it. Now an IP puts in a "referece"-book (publisher is general LLC books) consisting of copied en-WP articles. I think it is not okay to reference WP by WP, and also the german article will be referenced by the en WP through the back door. (the article is closed by the moment in German WP, because of edit-war). Please have a look at the article and its discussion page, where I put my thoughts. Sorry for my bad English. Kind Regards --Robertsan1 (talk) 17:36, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
BC & BCE v AD & BC
Hey Bearcat:
Will leave them alone until there's a way to fix it properly. It does, bother me and others, because it is a Christian designation and there are other religions in the world, that include 2 major groups.
Yo —Preceding unsigned comment added by YoMenashe (talk • contribs) 16:09, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Jay LaBoy
Hi Bearcat, I made the changes you suggested a while ago on Jay Laboys page. Please let me know if it is okay. I also have another question, I started to add references to Philip Jamision article, a famous painter that lives near me. Then it lead me to the Jamison twins, which I thought I would pull info together to improve their page. There was a section removed on the dedication of their book. I have added this type of section before for Nick Brandt. I wrote on Verbal's page to ask why he removed it, was it a mistake and he is not responding. I just want to know what I'm allow to do? Can I add it back since he is not responding? I'm still learning here at Wiki, please let me know.Thisandthem (talk) 01:21, 23 August 2010 (UTC) YoMenashe (talk) 16:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Fortis Hospitals
Was there not a previous version of this page that could be reverted to?
MattyMatt01 (talk) 19:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Categorizing musicians/bands
Are these changes following the standard for categories? [2] [3] User is changing individuals to group cats. It doesn't seem right to me. See discussion on editor's talk page... not exactly a convincing argument. Thanks. --CutOffTies (talk) 20:51, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the follow up. --CutOffTies (talk) 11:39, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Decoding Reality
- 23:26, 14 August 2010 Bearcat (talk | contribs) deleted "Decoding Reality" (Blatant advertising)
What could be changed about this page to make it such that you won't consider it advertising? It's not intended to be, but rather documenting an important popular text which is available in most book stores. This has to deal with quantum theory, quantum computation, and there are only a few texts on the subject written for a popular audience, and this has now become the most popular of these. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob.biamonte (talk • contribs) 14:51, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments - I'm new to wiki land and what you sent was helpful. I'll get the book page up and ready and contact you when it's good to go. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob.biamonte (talk • contribs) 11:30, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Moncton City Hall
An IP user has repeatedly added a link to a website attacking Moncton City Council to the page and attacks me whenever I remove it. I don't remember how to report this kind of thing (apparently the vandalism report page thing is for serious problems or something) so I am letting you know. link vıdıoman 10:06, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Trying to change "American scientist open access forum" to "American Scientist Open Access Forum"
Thanks for the suggestion to put in links, but it would help if I could change the name to caps, and I don't know how! Is there a way to alias it? Stevan Harnad 00:41, 29 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harnad (talk • contribs)
Thanks for moving "American scientist open access forum" to "American Scientist Open Access Forum"
Thanks so much -- and for the speed too! Stevan Harnad 01:21, 29 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harnad (talk • contribs)
Would you please let me know why you have deleted the page of "College of Engineering Ewha Womans Univ.?
I think this is not an advertising page, and is kept updating. Please let me know what was the problem.Childman1204 (talk) 01:25, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed. I was in the middle of fixing problems. Thanks for pointing out the problem. Is there any way that I can see the original page, such that I can fix and update the page? I could not find the original page, as it's been deleted.. Thanks for your help.Childman1204 (talk) 01:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your great help. I am trying to obey the rules of Wikipedia. Thanks again. Childman1204 (talk) 01:45, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
M-A92
Can you double check M-A92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). I pretty sure they are the return of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Éric Gagnier but I'd like another view. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 12:56, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking care of that. I'll leave a message with one of the English speaking admins on the French Wikipedia later. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 20:22, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
AWB
For some reason AWB seems to be putting disambiguation templates at the top of pages, above maintenance templates like {{refimprove}}. I'm not sure this is how the templates are supposed to be placed.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:32, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- I think Template talk:About and/or Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser would be better places for you to ask your question. Although I use AWB, I'm not a developer, so there's not really a lot that I can actually do one way or the other. Bearcat (talk) 18:41, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- I will check that out then.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
CIDA
The Canadian International Development Agency's page is locked indefinitely. I'm not sure I understand what you mean by having 10 undisputed edits before we can edit the page again. Please advise. Thanks. Missmiu (talk) 21:53, 29 August 2010
Category question
Hey Bearcat, as the resident Canadian Category Expert, what is your thought on Category:Canadian francophone municipalities outside Quebec?
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
WWMX review?
Would you mind looking at the article and adding suggestions on how it could be improved (to the talk page)? Thanks. ---- Theaveng (talk) 05:42, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Stockton Grand Rapids
I am unsure why you deleted the page Stockton Grand Rapids. Although it was a page about an artist/ or musical group I provided valid press references, and was in the process of making improvements to the page. Kind of a dick move. —Preceding unsigned comment added by StocktonKG (talk • contribs) 15:33, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Ambassador21
OK, thanks for response. Does it mean you can write real bullshit about AMBASSADOR21 - for example, we never sing in Belorussian language and we don't play breakcore. May be we can collaborate better, instead? Thanks! Alexey Protasov / AMBASSADOR21 / Invasion invasion@ambassador21.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Invasion21 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. I corrcted it. All data according official band web-site. All other information not nessessary. Will be very appreciated if in the end there will not wrong information. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Invasion21 (talk • contribs) 09:38, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Just a comment; you don't really need to tag an article for improvement when it's been blanked as a copyright violation - it'll be deleted or restored/rewritten with all of the old categories and links (or maintenance tags other people already put on it before it was blanked). VernoWhitney (talk) 20:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Standard for including Alberta in place name
Hello again. I hope it is not too much of a bother, but I was hoping you could chime in on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alberta#Standard for including Alberta in place name, because it involves moves only an administrator can do, and none of the current commenters are admins. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 05:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC)