→DYK for Intelligence in Canada: just noticed |
|||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
:But socks deserve nothing! --<span style="text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Σ|The Σ]] <sup>[[User talk:Σ|talk]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-3.5ex">[[Special:Contributions/Σ|contribs]]</sub></span> 00:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC) |
:But socks deserve nothing! --<span style="text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Σ|The Σ]] <sup>[[User talk:Σ|talk]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-3.5ex">[[Special:Contributions/Σ|contribs]]</sub></span> 00:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
::How...disappointing. I thought he was just an enthusiastic and unusually mistake-prone editor...never occurred to me he might be a sock. <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Book Antiqua, Palatino, serif;" color="#BBAED0">[[User:Feezo|Feezo]] <font size="-2">[[User_talk:Feezo|(send a signal]] | [[Special:Contributions/Feezo|watch the sky]])</font></span> 00:39, 6 June 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:39, 6 June 2011
![]() |
![]() Talk page () |
![]() Pending Changes |
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
TUSC token 2339c534cb61cc74abb7ceaa3d0854e7
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Talkback
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 02:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
... discospinster talk 02:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 04:02, 2 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
... discospinster talk 04:02, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
BLP unsourced vs other more appropriate tags
Can you please try to use tags such as {{BLP sources}} and {{No footnotes}} instead of {{BLP unsourced}} for articles that have a source, but is listed as an external link or similar, such as this one, especially when the reference is generally considered as reliable. If it was to a personal website/facebook/myspace/twitter then I'd agree with unsourced, but to well established database sites or things like university faculty sites, then the sources and no footnotes still lets the article creator that we need more, but doesn't confuse him into thinking you must not have seen the reference that he provided. {{primary sources}} is another good one to use. Regards, The-Pope (talk) 12:44, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Phew!
I feel your pain and will try to get those points down.
Hey Matt, um, I would like your advice on how to proceed. I have built up info on nuclear waste classification and it seems that a very powerful administrator deleted the page, as "random fork" but by which i suspect he meant redundant. Buuuut this is such a vast topic that IMO he could be convinced to let the article move forward. Here is what I have prepared for him although have not yet provided him with a![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 23:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC)DYK for Intelligence in Canada
- But socks deserve nothing! --The Σ talkcontribs 00:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- How...disappointing. I thought he was just an enthusiastic and unusually mistake-prone editor...never occurred to me he might be a sock. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 00:39, 6 June 2011 (UTC)