Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Archive 5) (bot |
→WP:NPPDRAFT: copied |
||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
Some background discussion can be found at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation#Move_to_Draft_space_as_an_alternative_to_deletion]]. Please share your thoughts. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 22:11, 10 July 2019 (UTC) |
Some background discussion can be found at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation#Move_to_Draft_space_as_an_alternative_to_deletion]]. Please share your thoughts. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 22:11, 10 July 2019 (UTC) |
||
:{{u|Kvng}}, I suggest putting this at [[WT:NPP/R]] which is the more active place to catch reviewer attention. Best, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 22:51, 10 July 2019 (UTC) |
:{{u|Kvng}}, I suggest putting this at [[WT:NPP/R]] which is the more active place to catch reviewer attention. Best, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 22:51, 10 July 2019 (UTC) |
||
::I have copied the proposal [[Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers#WP:NPPDRAFT_vs._AfC_acceptance_criteria|there]]. Anyone seeing this please reply at the new location. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 15:38, 12 July 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:38, 12 July 2019
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
/patrolled pages for discussion on development of the special patrol page (inactive). |
This page has archives. Sections older than 91 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Reading times
- Welcome: 2:42
- The Purpose: 3:40
- Special:NewPagesFeed: 1:19
- op level areas of concern: 2:03
- Copyright violations (WP:COPYVIO): 6:41
- Conflict of Interest (COI) and paid advocacy: 5:09
- Recreations: 0:49
- Sourcing issues: 0:46
- Deletion: 5:02
- Drafts: 1:35
- Foreign language pages (WP:Notenglish): 2:36
- Article titles: 5:06
- Stub tagging: 0:28
- Categorizing: 0;23
- WikiProject Sorting: 0:31
- New unreviewed article: 0:8
- Be nice to the newbies: 2:01
- Unreviewing: 1:42
A new newsletter directory is out!
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
- – Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Notification of related bot request
Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 38 § DannyS712 bot 38 DannyS712 (talk) 21:27, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
The NPP Browser
I am learning about new page reviewer requirements, and saw the link for the NPP Browser is not working. Is that only a recent error or is that tool no longer working? --- FULBERT (talk) 12:45, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Yup, it fell victim to a recent software change on the hosting platform, and the author hasn't gotten round to migrating it yet. Hope they'll manage it at some point; it's rather a useful tool. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:40, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Are there any other tools that allow for keyword or category searches Elmidae (talk · contribs)? I am starting off on my new page reviewer journey, and thought that would be helpful to be able to sift through the many requests that are out there. Thanks. --- FULBERT (talk) 04:35, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- FULBERT Fulbert: Welcome to NPP. Feel free to ask questions as you go about your work these next couple of weeks. As far as I know it was a one of a kind. It really is too bad that it hasn't been ported over because it was a great tool. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:37, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks Barkeep49. Seems a simple way of trying to organize the queue, but perhaps it will be replaced by something even more helpful. Hey, wishes and hopes keep us young! --- FULBERT (talk) 13:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- FULBERT Fulbert: Welcome to NPP. Feel free to ask questions as you go about your work these next couple of weeks. As far as I know it was a one of a kind. It really is too bad that it hasn't been ported over because it was a great tool. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:37, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Are there any other tools that allow for keyword or category searches Elmidae (talk · contribs)? I am starting off on my new page reviewer journey, and thought that would be helpful to be able to sift through the many requests that are out there. Thanks. --- FULBERT (talk) 04:35, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
I you don't mind the possible risk, you can access it at http://139.162.191.26/NPP/public/. I found the link at User:Rentier. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
The draft section suggests that "A newly-created article may be about a generally acceptable topic, but be far from sufficiently developed or sourced for publication." This is either bad or sloppy advice. We should not be moving articles that meet AFC acceptance criteria in to Draft namespace.
Primary AFC acceptance criteria is that the article is unlikely to be deleted at AFD. Based on my AFD experience, I beleive safe to say that an article about "a generally acceptable topic" is still not WP:LIKELY to be deleted. The other policy-based reasons for AFC rejection are severe NPOV and copyvio issues. I beleive NPP articles with these issues are usually disposed through G11 and G12.
My preference is that we strike the Draft option for NPP reviewers. I've been told, without supporting evidence, that moving underdeveloped new articles to Draft space works well. If so, perhaps the advice can be tightened up to mesh better with AFC policy.
Some background discussion can be found at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation#Move_to_Draft_space_as_an_alternative_to_deletion. Please share your thoughts. ~Kvng (talk) 22:11, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Kvng, I suggest putting this at WT:NPP/R which is the more active place to catch reviewer attention. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:51, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have copied the proposal there. Anyone seeing this please reply at the new location. ~Kvng (talk) 15:38, 12 July 2019 (UTC)