GA Review
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Opening comments
Well written article; doesn't look like it'll need very much alteration before it can declared a good one. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 12:41, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Review
A nice piece of work, just a couple of things to tick off.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
The lead section could do with a little expansion to cover all of the main points of the article.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
The last sentence of the article needs a cite; consider merging refs 10 and 11.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Maybe we could have a short summary of what happened 1905-1939 and 1945-1970 (just a sentence, or half of one), but only if it can be cited, of course.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- I do like the images; you might consider touching them up (or not, for that authentic look).
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Just a couple of things to fixAll good
- Pass/Fail:
- Jarry1250 (t, c) 13:08, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Hello, Jarry1250, and thank you for taking the time to perform the GA review on this article. I believe that I have addressed all of the suggestions made in your review, with the exception of "short summary of what happened 1905-1939 and 1945-1970." Although I recognize the omission of this information is an inherent weakness in the article, I could find no information about these periods in any of the reference material available to me. I hope that these modifications meet with your approval. Alphageekpa (talk) 12:05, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough, we're only human. Duly passed, with the traditional suggestion that you go review someone else's potentially good article. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 12:44, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello Ladies and Gentlemen; Our home (1942~1964) was within four city blocks of A&B Allentown; and my older brother was an accountant for A&B. I may require help adding to the LEHIGH VALLEY portion of the Pennsylvania Portal project. This is my first 'edit' attempt.70.15.231.113 (talk) 07:11, 27 February 2011 (UTC)