GA Review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- These sentences, in the Plot section, ---> "The Dunder Mifflin crew goes on a "motivational" cruise on a Lake Wallenpaupack ship Princess, captained by "Captain Jack" (Rob Riggle)" and "The boat's captain puts Dwight Shrute (Rainn Wilson) in charge of a fake wheel, which Dwight thinks is real", are a little hard to understand, it would be best for them to be re-written. Same section, I know who Katy is, but how 'bout the person that reads this article.
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- In the lead, it would be best to add (NBC) after "National Broadcasting Company". It would be best to link "Dunder Mifflin" in the Plot and it wouldn't hurt to link "Greg Daniels" in the Production section.
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article! Also, contact me if the above statements are answered.
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:43, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your time, I made changes off your suggestions, tell me what you think! --Mr.crabby (Talk) 01:59, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Its my pleasure, since this is one of my favorite tv shows. Thank you to Mr.crabby for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks again, this is the quickest GA review I've ever had --Mr.crabby (Talk) 21:56, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Its my pleasure, since this is one of my favorite tv shows. Thank you to Mr.crabby for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC)