- ^ a b Parker v. D.C., 478 F.3d 370, 401 (D.C. Cir. 2007) ("As such, we hold it unconstitutional.").
Paco Yunque
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paco Yunque
Hi Fred Bauder/Test. Tagging this article for AfD within just 6 minutes may have been a bit on the quick side. Do take a moment to check out WP:DELETION to be sure that you are applying the right tags, and you can also find out more exactly what NPP is all about at the New Page Patrol project. Please also remember to click the 'mark this page as patrolled' link to prevent the page from continuing to be listed. Not doing so can cause problems for bots that are also doing various clean ups and indexing. Thanks again for volunteering your time at NPP, and happy editing! Kudpung (talk) 13:44, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Paco Yunque
Please take some care when nominating an article for deletion. You tagged Paco Yunque for deletion 6 minutes after its creation. A quick google news search would have shown many hits in Spanish. Same goes for a google book search. In a situation like this where there is apparent possiblities for sourcing from non-English sources, don't you think it would be better to tag an article for notability and sources rather than jumping straight o an AFD? -- Whpq (talk) 15:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
You play whack-a-mole with terrible new pages like no one I've ever seen! Awesome!
See "New Page Patroller's Barnstar" at User:Timneu22
- Complete discussion
- Discussion on Jimbo's talk page about nomination for speedy deletion of swim ~ one moment after its creation [1]:User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Female_participation
- "I'm simply not interested"
- "I'm not concerned about this one bit"
- "I just. Don't. Care"
- Blanked, "I'm not in the conversation, so this isn't the place for it"