Welcome!
Hello, Proxxt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! -Phoenixrod (talk) 13:29, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
You are most welcome. I feel guilty as I have not finished the plot summary. I listened to this via audio book and got very busy with real life and did not get to finish. Am planning on checking the book out of the library and finish off the plot summary when I get back from vacation. I wish there were more sources, i.e. reviews for these books to provide more material to get the article out of stub/start class. If you find any let me know. I have some more books in the series ready to go on my Ipod so hopefully some more articles in the series will get created. I see you also enjoy the Harry Potter series, those were great books. Have you checked out WP:NOVEL, its a good project for people who enjoy fiction. Well gotta go finish packing..... --Captain-tucker (talk) 12:39, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar!
![]() |
The Order of Merlin (Third class) |
The Order of Merlin, the WikiProject Harry Potter Barnstar, is awarded by Lord Opeth to Proxxt for the dedication shown to the Harry Potter topic by doing a lot of grammar and typo work.. |
HP articles and Notability
Hey there. I would like you to the discussion taking place in the WikiProject HP regarding the Notability of the remaining articles. Cheers! --Lord Opeth (talk) 17:45, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Invite
I recently joined a project to help make Wikipedia better by decreasing the number of unreferenced articles, thought it might interest you:
--Captain-tucker (talk) 19:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Help with grammar and typos
Hi Proxxt. I need some help with this new section I wrote for Hermione: Hermione Granger#Reception. Would you please take a look and correct all grammar mistakes and typos? It is a very short section so it will not be such a great deal. --LøЯd ۞pεth 20:11, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks again for the grammar cleanup. I have never been very good with grammar. Have you read any of the books in this series? I really enjoy them, I just started the next book and will hopefully get an article up for that book as well. Thanks again for cleaning up my english. --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:17, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for your comments on my editor review page. You should be bold and start a new article, writing one for a novel is really not that difficult. As a librarian I would imagine you have access to the databases where you can find reviews in things like Publishers Weekly, Library Journal, Kirkus Reviews etc... I get access to these through my local libraries web site. So you should be able to easily create a reception section, then its just a matter of writing a plot summary. Some of which are included in the reviews. Give it a try, it will give you a good feeling of accomplishment when you are done, and feel free to ask me anything. Thanks again and have a great weekend.--Captain-tucker (talk) 13:04, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Marking edits "minor"?
It appears you mark most--if not all--your edits "minor". Perhaps this is done by default, but the Minor attribute has a specific meaning (see WP:MINOR), part of which is, "A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute."
While I think your edits are great, some of them could easily be disputed and are, therefore, not Minor. Please consider using the Minor checkbox only for those edits that fit the Wikipedia definition of "minor".
Thanks! — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 00:30, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, this is very helpful. I have been marking most changes I make as "minor", as I am usually making grammatical changes and don't change factual detail much or make big changes to core content. I am mindful of the good will out there and the great work people do. The "Ancient Rome" article has been driving me crazy as it has the potential to be an excellent resource but much of it is expressed in a very poor level of English useage and very inconsistent.
I am very pleased you drew this to my attention as one can feel a bit isolated working on Wikipedia and I am only too pleased to be directed to the most appropriate practices. It is very frustrating to leave invitations for comment on article discussion pages and find they are often ignored. So your comments appreicated. Proxxt (talk) 08:31, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, you're right. Sometimes, this feels like herding cats. I have nearly 1000 pages on my watch list; it's difficult to keep an eye on all of them. Keep up the good work! — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 10:02, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Chaheel Riens (talk) 12:38, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library needs you!
Did you know that Wikipedia has its own library? The Wikipedia Library is seeking volunteers from those in galleries, libraries, archives and museums.
- Become an account coordinator to distribute research accounts to editors
- Get involved in some of our special projects:
- Expand our Resources page with free resources for editors in all subject areas
- Help develop a template for citing archival collections
- Write guides to accessing and using library resources
Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Proxxt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Proxxt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Proxxt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)