Archive 10 | ← | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | → | Archive 20 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Roger Goodman
Email received around 5pm 5/22. Reference is no longer valid and considered libelous--hence the removal by news org. Any further edits to contain this false information will be considered an intentional violation. If you need further explanation I can send you the detailed explanation approved by family law attorneys. Thank you for your cooperation.
- ^ Liv, A few minutes ago, KOMO changed the offending sentence in the text version of our story about the PAC funding ads against the Roger Goodman campaign to read: “I asked Carns if it was fair to quote divorce documents in the Goodman ad.” The videos we post to our website are cut from our aired newscast and thus cannot be edited after the fact. The video has been removed. Kelly Just Executive Producer, Problem Solvers Unit KOMO-TV 140 4th Ave. N – Suite 370 Seattle, WA 98109 Desk: (206) 404-4235
Liv Grohn (talk) 09:30, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Liv Grohn
Roger Goodman
I reviewed your message. Please review mine as it seems that others are violating by not ensuring that their "undo" content is verifiable.
The divorce declaration cited in occurred in October 2012. The Motion of Contempt filed in August 2013 (presented in court September of 2013) is a completely separate entity from the Temporary Orders filed back in October. The Motion of Contempt, was in fact, filed in regard to violations to the Final Order (which was the settlement) which occurred in June of 2013. The contentious divorce documents from October 2012 were not a part of the Final Order.
"I asked Carns if it was fair to quote contentious divorce documents in the Goodman ad, particularly since they're part of his ex-wife requesting more money in the settlement."
Therefore, the contentious divorce documents had nothing to do with the Motion of Contempt that you site. And since it is is impossible to change any financials after a divorce settlement is signed (in our case June 2013)--the three things are not one related to the other, placed in a sentence as if they are:
contentious divorce documents (Temporary Order--October 2013) and settlement (Final Order/Settlement--June 2013) requesting more money (Motion of Contempt--August/September 2013)
Requests for financial relief for attorney fees when forced to return to court for violations of parenting plans and settlement agreements is routine, but completely separate from the final settlement (inferring money) Final Order.
That is why I continue to edit this so that it is factual. The "undo" edits are disingenuous and an inaccurate picture. Erroneous and libelous.
I need to add that while you might have an opinion that my statements made under penalty of perjury were simply allegations, that is an opinion--not based in fact. Contentious indicates: causing or likely to cause an argument; controversial. Roger too, had the right to respond to my supposed "allegations," under penalty of perjury but chose not to. That was the time to dispute my supposed "allegations." Under penalty of perjury. Through the court of law. Not now, through a medium other than the court of law that doesn't apply the same standards or opportunity to rebut the accusations made.
Therefore, it should be assumed that my divorce declaration statements were not contentious because they caused no argument or disagreement. Roger, making no response to the court, indicates concurrence, not controversy.
I can only assume that the edits are made by supporters who are not caring about the Wikipedia standards for truth and non-inflamotory statements. Facts are very different from truth in Wiki world as well as my world. The edits essentially state that statements made under penalty of perjury are assumed false while statements with no standards for assessment or recourse are not. That is incongruent with reason. As you know, edits must be made fairly and rationally accessing the validity of claims.Perhaps you should be paying more attention to those who are not following the rules for biographies. I will be reporting those who continue to make libelous claims and making copies for my attorneys.
If you would like, I can have one of my attorneys explain in legalese. If you have any questions please feel free to ask.
I understand completely how this kind of error could have been made. That is why I simply request that you make the corrections asked.
Liv Grohn (talk) 10:10, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Liv Grohn
Good morning Stuartyeates. I thank you for taking an interest in this page. I am surprised that you take exception to the (very large) number of persons mentioned who have no notability whatsoever apart from qualifying as at one time owning or skippering one of these vessels. This of course is almost inevitable in the nature of a list.
I would of course like to see this page as good as it can be. Would moving the page to "List of Murray-Darling steamboat people" overcome your misgivings? Doug butler (talk) 23:03, 24 July 2014 (UTC) Doug butler (talk) 23:08, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
- Mr problem is not with the name. My problem is that much of the material appears to be based on primary sources, with no obvious sources for much of it. Wikipedia is meant to be based on secondary sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)data
- I was going to address that point at a later stage when I had better knowledge of WP acceptable sources. The vast majority of data has come from contemporary newspaper reports, which I understood was OK. No; I referred to your first review, "This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: Many people fail WP:LISTN; this needs to be trimmed or moved to a different namespace. Please help improve this article if you can. (July 2014)" Doug butler (talk) 00:06, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Notability guidelines, including WP:LISTN and similar, are grounded in the use of secondary sources that cover the topic(s) in detail. Moving the article to draft:, User_talk: or User: namespaces would remove the immediate need for reliable sources by indicating that the article is not 'ready' yet. These issues are all derived from a lack of secondary sources; add secondary sources and all your problems go away. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:28, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- I was going to address that point at a later stage when I had better knowledge of WP acceptable sources. The vast majority of data has come from contemporary newspaper reports, which I understood was OK. No; I referred to your first review, "This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: Many people fail WP:LISTN; this needs to be trimmed or moved to a different namespace. Please help improve this article if you can. (July 2014)" Doug butler (talk) 00:06, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 July 2014
- Wikimedia in education: Education program gaining momentum in Israel
- Traffic report: The World Cup hangs on, though tragedies seek to replace it
- News and notes: Institutional media uploads to Commons get a bit easier
- Featured content: Why, they're plum identical!
Wikidata weekly summary #119
Reference Errors on 27 July
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Socialist Alternative (New Zealand) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 7
Books & Bytes
Issue 7, June-July 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)
- Seven new donations, two expanded partnerships
- TWL's Final Report up, read the summary
- Adventures in Las Vegas, WikiConference USA, and updates from TWL coordinators
- Spotlight: Blog post on BNA's impact on one editor's research
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 July 2014
- Book review: Knowledge or unreality?
- Recent research: Shifting values in the paid content debate
- News and notes: How many more hoaxes will Wikipedia find?
- Wikimedia in education: Success in Egypt and the Arab World
- Traffic report: Doom and gloom vs. the power of Reddit
- Featured content: Skeletons and Skeltons
Wikidata weekly summary #120
Disambiguation link notification for August 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lionel Bradley Pett, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BSA, MD and MA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Exe (locomotive)
Hi. I've removed your deletion proposal for this article. I do see your point, and although I could upgrade and expand the article, as this is one of a class of locomotives built for the line (plusa modern replica, and another in construction), I think a better solution is to merge all three or four similar articles into one. If you can give me a week or so, I will get that put in place. Hope that is okay with you. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 23:50, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- A couple of weeks is fine. A couple of years, not so much :) Stuartyeates (talk) 23:52, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Invitation to WikiProject TAFI
![]() |
Hello, Stuartyeates. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement. Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's Nominated articles page. Also feel free to contribute to !voting for new weekly selections at the project's talk page. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. NorthAmerica1000 17:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC) |
- Thanks for joining the project! Please note that if you'd like to receive weekly notices about new TAFI selections, just add your name to the project's Notifications list. NorthAmerica1000 02:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 August 2014
- Technology report: A technologist's Wikimania preview
- Traffic report: Ebola
- Featured content: Bottoms, asses, and the fairies that love them
- Wikimedia in education: Leading universities educate with Wikipedia in Mexico
This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2014)
![]() Sheridan Le Fanu was one of the leading ghost story writers of the nineteenth century
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Animatronics • Vatican Library Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:02, 11 August 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
Disambiguation link notification for August 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Rena Owen
- added links pointing to John Anderson, John Simpson, Kevin Reynolds and Vincent Ward
- Alister George McLellan
- added a link pointing to Westport
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #121
autoblock
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
- Stuartyeates (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Bardolivaaro". The reason given for Bardolivaaro's block is: "Copyright violations".
- Blocking administrator: JamesBWatson (talk • blocks)
Decline reason: System's telling me it can't find the block and it may already have been lifted. — Daniel Case (talk) 08:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- It does appear that I can now edit from this IP address. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:08, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: July 2014
|
Edit war
Stuart. Please refrain from sending me self-serving messages about edit warring when the only issue is your insistence in removing properly sourced, relevant material from the Hager article on extremely flimsy pretexts. Come on man, you know that's not on. 101.98.195.208 (talk) 00:58, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Edit war
![Stop icon](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history at Nicky Hager shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Should I post this notice on User:GHSinclair as well? I see you didn't notify your co-editor.Edgespath24 (talk) 03:30, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Professor Michelle Coote
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Professor Michelle Coote requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 05:23, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #122
Wikidata weekly summary #114
This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2014)
![]() A historical map of West Africa from 1707
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Ghost story • Animatronics Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:11, 18 August 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
The Signpost: 13 August 2014
- Special report: Twitter bots catalogue government edits to Wikipedia
- Traffic report: Disease, decimation and distraction
- Wikimedia in education: Global Education: WMF's Perspective
- Wikimania: Promised the moon, settled for the stars
- News and notes: Media Viewer controversy spreads to German Wikipedia
- In the media: Monkey selfie, net neutrality, and hoaxes
- Featured content: Cambridge got a lot of attention this week
I see you removed the PROD from Helen McGregor (geologist). In what way do you think notability is satisfied? A h-index of 12 is well below the threshold of WP:PROF#C1, and everything else listed is typical for an ordinary academic, -- 101.117.57.69 (talk) 08:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
I see you also removed the PRODs from Rebecca Spindler and Erin Roger, which have similar notability concerns. I would like to request that all 3 articles be listed at AfD. -- 101.117.57.69 (talk) 08:16, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
- You're more than welcome to get an account and put them up for AfD. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:00, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Donald Bannerman Macleod
- added a link pointing to BA
- Keith Syers
- added a link pointing to University of Newcastle
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:23, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 August 2014
- Traffic report: Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero
- WikiProject report: Bats and gloves
- Op-ed: A new metric for Wikimedia
- Featured content: English Wikipedia departs for Japan
Wikidata weekly summary #123
This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2014)
![]() A solar flare erupts from the Sun, an example of solar activity.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: History of West Africa • Ghost story Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:03, 25 August 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
Hi Stuart - what makes her notable? and Keith Syers. Also Miriam Meyerhoff and Pablo Gabriel Etchegoin - NealeFamily (talk) 02:26, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- They're part of a recent tranche of academics I've done. I believe that they all meet Wikipedia:Notability (academics), which is a pretty low bar. Feel free to tag them / nominate them fro deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:11, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francis Brian Shorland, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Conduction, Kenneth MacKenzie and John McKinnon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 August 2014
- In the media: Plagiarism and vandalism dominate Wikipedia news
- News and notes: Media Viewer—Wikimedia's emotional roller-coaster
- Traffic report: Viral
- Featured content: Cheats at Featured Pictures!
This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2014)
![]() A Nunivak Cup'ig man with raven maskette – in the Raven Tales the raven is the Creator god
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Solar activity • History of West Africa Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:02, 1 September 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
Wikidata weekly summary #124
Authority control
May I pester you, again, to return to Template talk:Authority control? Cheers, Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:49, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
ANI notification
Hi, I mentioned your name at ANI here Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Abuse of deletion process so performing the mandatory notification. Cheers. Nil Einne (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
I mentioned you in the same discussion. -- nafSadh did say 23:24, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks people. I've reluctantly replied. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:24, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 September 2014
- Arbitration report: Media viewer case is suspended
- Featured content: 1882 × 5 in gold, and thruppence more
- Traffic report: Holding Pattern
- WikiProject report: Gray's Anatomy (v. 2)
This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2014)
File:Jvc gz-mg555-02.jpg Hello, Stuartyeates.
A handheld camcorder ia a typical consumer electronics device
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Raven Tales • Solar activity Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:02, 8 September 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
Block McCloud
Hi, I have found this news magazine article, regarding to a history of Block McCloud. Is this an acceptable source? TwinTurbo (talk) 09:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- That's an excellent source. A couple more like that and you've saved the article :) Stuartyeates (talk) 09:25, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: August 2014
|
Disambiguation link notification for September 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leon Francis Phillips, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wiley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #125
The Signpost: 10 September 2014
- Traffic report: Refuge in celebrity
- Featured content: The louse and the fish's tongue
- WikiProject report: Checking that everything's all right
This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2014)
![]() Arches were used in Ancient Roman architecture to build aqueducts, such as the Aqueduct of Segovia
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Consumer electronics • Raven Tales Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:03, 15 September 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:23, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi Stuart - I was assessing this article but she does not seem to be notable from what you have written. Am I missing something? NealeFamily (talk) 22:52, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- @NealeFamily: Fair enough. I've moved it to draft and will add some more to it. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:56, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- If you want me to do some research on her, let me know - happy to help. NealeFamily (talk) 02:39, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- @NealeFamily: Thanks for the offer, but I'm seeing a buttload of hits on nzherald and stuff for her name, so I'll sort through that and the more well-known blogosphere first. It is, after all, my responsibility to find the sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:17, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- You do so much, I don't mind assisting NealeFamily (talk) 03:20, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- @NealeFamily: The fact that I know friends will ping me when my stubs get too stuby gives me the confidence to continue creating the number and breadth of stubs that I do. Anyway, take a look at the new Draft:Prue Hyman. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:29, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- If you want me to do some research on her, let me know - happy to help. NealeFamily (talk) 02:39, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Looks much better and should cross any notablitiy threshhold. She has made some significant contributions especially in NZ I suggest you move it back out of draft and I will add further information as I find it. Keep up the good work.NealeFamily (talk) 07:51, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 September 2014
- WikiProject report: A trip up north to Scotland
- News and notes: Wikipedia's traffic statistics are off by nearly one-third
- Traffic report: Tolstoy leads a varied pack
- Featured content: Which is not like the others?
Constructiveness and Teamwork
Your revert yesterday instantly branded as unconstructive a protest against a laughably prejudiced destruction of a serious WPbiog of Dennis Rawlins. Up to a few days ago it had accented his lifetime of primary research in refined academic areas. But after August 30 complaints on Graeme Bartlett WPtalk about CSICOP tool and WPadministrator Vsmith's slanders and threats against Rawlins, the biog was deleted on September 12 by Vsmith's catspaw Drmies and replaced by a stub blatantly designed by CSICOP detractors to pretend that Rawlins's career has accomplished almost nothing but headlines in second rate newspapers and referring to him as merely a "professional skeptic". (Such preciously unselfconscious smearing from professional skeptic CSICOP is as amusing as irony gets.) Do you find that constructive? Will you help create a fair biog, more competent than the original, but which recognizes not only Rawlins's few errors (which he repeatedly insured were fully represented in the biog) but provides at least a summary of his many credits and discoveries, also his repeated vindications by unexpected new evidence? Will you do what you can to discourage threatening and conniving administrators and vandals?
How did the Rawlins biog get onto your watch list? The flap over it is a cesspool of revenge, threats, extortion, slander, and primarily suppression which deserves chronicling as much as the original "sTARBABY". (And the offending organization is so well known that its behavior will interest a lot more people.) Anyone asked to become a partner in constitutionally unhumble Vsmith's unprovoked and dementedly bungled (see Bartlett talk on Velikovsky) war against Rawlins should check his conscience and his caution.2thedef (talk) 04:32, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- I know very little about Dennis Rawlins, CSICOP or any of these other people. What I do know is that wikipedia is an encyclopedia, a tertiary source, built on reliable independent secondary sources. If I understand your complaint correctly, finding such sources relating to Dennis Rawlins needs to be your first step. Without secondary sources you're unlikely to get far. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:59, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
You do not even acknowledge the obvious question of how and by whom you got assigned to a subject you admittedly know so little about. There are secondary sources galore in the previous biog, University of Cambridge, New York Times, British Museum, Isis, and so on. But Vsmith's Drmies tossed them all out, instead slumming at the low end of newspaper stories to create a half-smear rather than a biog. The material you autoeliminated was rambunctious but valid in all respects while the biog you protect is deliberately misleading. Why are you fronting for smearers and suppressors? Your calling the September 16 intro to the biog unconstructive is typical of the Rawlins WP biog history. Faced with undeniably relevant and accurate facts — find some excuse for deletion to protect the ever more deeply invested censoring and threatening culprits and their heroes and saints, while denigrating or disappearing material in favor of their devils. Kill as many awful facts as possible using labels like "blog", not Reliable, "stuff", unencyclopedic, "junk", not constructive, "trivial". If you are serious about finding secondary sources then just undo Drmies's edit and you will have dozens of such sources. With input from every side the biog can then be mutually improved in stages to the satisfaction of all but fanatics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2thedef (talk • contribs) 22:06, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Woo Wing Thye
Hello. Am trying to improve the Woo Wing Thye page. Curious why academic journals should be considered unreliable or "self-published." Please advise.Malwriter (talk) 09:24, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- Material written by the subject is not independent, even after peer review. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:30, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- Right. If your subject has exciting things to report, secondary sources should do it. Otherwise every academic biography would turn into a resume. Or, to put it another way, a journal article by person X on topic Y is a reliable source, possibly, for article Y. It is not an acceptable source for article X. Drmies (talk) 15:28, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Assessment
Hi Stuart, if you do assessments of new MP pages, can you please include the politics parameters, too? And the Maori parameter, where appropriate. Here's some code for copy-pasting: Schwede66 21:01, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
{{WikiProject New Zealand |class=Stub |importance=low |politics=yes |politics-importance=low |maori=yes |maori-importance= low }}
I normally use a tool that doesn't allow me to do that, so I should probably stop doing these MPs. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:03, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2014)
![]() Arches were used in Ancient Roman architecture to build aqueducts, such as the Aqueduct of Segovia
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Ancient Roman architecture • Consumer electronics Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:03, 22 September 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
The Signpost: 24 September 2014
- Featured content: Oil paintings galore
- Recent research: 99.25% of Wikipedia birthdates accurate; focused Wikipedians live longer; merging WordNet, Wikipedia and Wiktionary
- Traffic report: Wikipedia watches the referendum in Scotland
- WikiProject report: GAN reviewers take note: competition time
- Arbitration report: Banning Policy, Gender Gap, and Waldorf education
This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2014)
![]() Aerial photograph of George Bush Intercontinental Airport, an international airport in Houston, United States
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Ancient Roman architecture • Ancient Roman architecture Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:03, 29 September 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
Wikidata weekly summary #126
Disambiguation link notification for October 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Zealand Parole Board, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Victoria University, Tony Taylor and John Robson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Alert to Vrobot
Future discussion of Dennis Rawlins's biog will soon shift to Talk:Dennis Rawlins. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2thedef (talk • contribs) 01:26, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 October 2014
- From the editor: The Signpost needs your help
- Dispatches: Let's get serious about plagiarism
- WikiProject report: Animals, farms, forests, USDA? It must be WikiProject Agriculture
- Traffic report: Shanah Tovah
- Featured content: Brothers at War
Wikidata weekly summary #127
Ferrymead 125 and NZ Rail 150
Hi, re your PROD of Ferrymead 125 and NZ Rail 150: I notice that you used the rationale "Not notable. No evidence of awards, charting or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. No refs" - why are awards necessary, and what "charting" would there have been? This sounds like a rationale for a music album, not a railway event. It is also not the first time that you have done this: you used almost exactly the same rationale two months ago on this steam locomotive. Please ensure that the PROD rationale is appropriate. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:16, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2014)
![]() Seasoned and chargrilled lamb fillet steak
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: International airport • Ancient Roman architecture Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
Tech News: 2014-41
06:10, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 8
Books & Bytes
Issue 8, August-September2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)
- TWL now a Wikimedia Foundation program, moves on from grant status
- Four new donations, including large DeGruyter parntership, pilot with Elsevier
- New TWL coordinators, Wikimania news, new library platform discussions, Wiki Loves Libraries update, and more
- Spotlight: "Traveling Through History" - an editor talks about his experiences with a TWL newspaper archive, Newspapers.com
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Enjoy Public Art Gallery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dominion Post. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Wellington GAA
Hi Stuart - noticed your prod on the Wellington GAA article. There is also an Auckland GAA one. I think it might be better to merge both articles into a new one about Gaelic Football in New Zealand instead. Your thoughts? NealeFamily (talk) 00:09, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- The problem with that approach is that neither of them have reliable sources, so merging doesn't help. Indeed, Australasia_GAA is also lacking independent sources. Sport really isn't my thing, but someone needs to find sources for these. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:58, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed, but they probably will have some sources as it is an international sport, albeit that it would be relatively minor in NZ and probably Australia. It put a note to the author and see what happens. NealeFamily (talk) 03:33, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 October 2014
- In the media: Opposition research firm blocked; Australian bushfires
- Featured content: From a wordless novel to a coat of arms via New York City
- Traffic report: Panic and denial
- Technology report: HHVM is the greatest thing since sliced bread
This Month in GLAM: September 2014
|
Wikidata weekly summary #128
Merge and redirect
Just so you know, "merge and redirect" is the same as "merge" since "redirect" is implied once the merge is complete (so as to keep the links of attribution). czar ♔ 16:10, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm aware that redirect is the default. I find "merge and redirect" a better explanation for newbies, however. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:34, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2014)
![]() Central America is the geographic region that connects North America and South America.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Steak • International airport Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:04, 13 October 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
Tech News: 2014-42
08:54, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:45, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 October 2014
- Op-ed: Ships—sexist or sexy?
- Arbitration report: One case closed and two opened
- Featured content: Bells ring out at the Temple of the Dragon at Peace
- Technology report: Attempting to parse wikitext
- Traffic report: Now introducing ... mobile data
- WikiProject report: Signpost reaches the Midwest
Nomination of Sophophobia for deletion
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sophophobia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophophobia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Srleffler (talk) 21:33, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Fear of daylight for deletion
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fear of daylight is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fear of daylight until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Srleffler (talk) 21:45, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Bibliophobia for deletion
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bibliophobia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibliophobia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Srleffler (talk) 21:59, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Queensland Heritage Register - live and dangerous!
I have started rolling out the articles (and learning new things as I go and tweaking the generator accordingly for future articles). They automatically go into the hidden Category:Articles incorporating text from the Queensland Heritage Register (please review) which is a sub-category of the hidden Category:Articles incorporating text from the Queensland Heritage Register. After someone other than me has reviewed/refined them, I am asking if they can move the article into the parent category. That way, the "please review" category should contain only the newer unreviewed items. So when you have a spare moment, please feel free to review/refine the new articles. I am not sure how quickly I will roll them out (a bit under the hammer with real life and WMAU events at the moment). So thanks in advance for any help you can give. With continual editor attrition, I think we have to move more to using to automation to create and maintain articles, but it is a "dark art". Kerry (talk) 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
FYI
You might be interested in in this. Cheers, Jim Carter (from public cyber) 04:59, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2014)
Inside an ice hotel in Jukkasjärvi, Sweden
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Central America • Steak Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
Tech News: 2014-43
13:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #129
Disambiguation link notification for October 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wystan Curnow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Landfall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 October 2014
- Featured content: Admiral on deck: a modern Ada Lovelace
- Traffic report: Death, War, Pestilence... Movies and TV
- WikiProject report: De-orphanning articles—a huge task but with a huge team of volunteers to help
Wikidata weekly summary #114
This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2014)
Grand Canyon of Yellowstone, the world's first national park
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Ice hotel • Central America Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:05, 27 October 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
Tech News: 2014-44
05:21, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Halloween cheer!
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Women's Refuge (New Zealand), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
WP:PERM Request
Please see your request details and comments at the permissions page.
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cd/Wikipedia_Accountcreators.png/130px-Wikipedia_Accountcreators.png)
After reviewing your request for the account creator right, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:
- The account creator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
- The account creator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the account creator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the account creator right. Happy editing! — xaosflux Talk 13:44, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Class project welcome template
Hi, Stuart. Could you tell me where this template is located? I had a look around Category:Welcome templates but couldn't find a likely candidate. Cheers. -- Rrburke (talk) 17:20, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- You mean the one I've been using on new student user pages? I use Wikipedia:Twinkle which makes it a pointy-pointy clicky-clicky operation, now typing involved. I have no idea what the underlying template is called, sorry. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:25, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Rrburke: It's
{{subst:Welcome student}}
. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:17, 30 October 2014 (UTC)- Thanks! -- Rrburke (talk) 21:24, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Rrburke: It's
Disambiguation link notification for October 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ruahine Albert, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages MP and Women's Refuge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 October 2014
- Featured content: Go West, young man
- In the media: Wikipedia a trusted source on Ebola; Wikipedia study labeled government waste; football biography goes viral
- Maps tagathon: Find 10,000 digitised maps this weekend
- Traffic report: Ebola, Ultron, and Creepy Articles
Wikidata weekly summary #131
This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2014)
![]() A pizza is an oven-baked flat bread typically topped with tomato sauce, cheese and various toppings
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: National park • Ice hotel Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:23, 3 November 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
Tech News: 2014-45
17:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
This stub's deletion might be controversial. Bearian (talk) 21:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
New Wikipedia Library Accounts Now Available (November 2014)
Hello Wikimedians!
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b3/Wikipedia_Library_owl.svg/150px-Wikipedia_Library_owl.svg.png)
The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:
- DeGruyter: 1000 new accounts for English and German-language research. Sign up on one of two language Wikipedias:
- Fold3: 100 new accounts for American history and military archives
- Scotland's People: 100 new accounts for Scottish genealogy database
- British Newspaper Archive: expanded by 100+ accounts for British newspapers
- Highbeam: 100+ remaining accounts for newspaper and magazine archives
- Questia: 100+ remaining accounts for journal and social science articles
- JSTOR: 100+ remaining accounts for journal archives
Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team.23:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
- This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.
New Wikipedia Library Accounts Now Available (November 2014)
Hello Wikimedians!
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b3/Wikipedia_Library_owl.svg/150px-Wikipedia_Library_owl.svg.png)
The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:
- DeGruyter: 1000 new accounts for English and German-language research. Sign up on one of two language Wikipedias:
- Fold3: 100 new accounts for American history and military archives
- Scotland's People: 100 new accounts for Scottish genealogy database
- British Newspaper Archive: expanded by 100+ accounts for British newspapers
- Highbeam: 100+ remaining accounts for newspaper and magazine archives
- Questia: 100+ remaining accounts for journal and social science articles
- JSTOR: 100+ remaining accounts for journal archives
Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 23:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
- This message was delivered via the Mass Message to the Book & Bytes recipient list.
The Signpost: 05 November 2014
- In the media: Predicting the flu, MH17 conspiracy theories
- Traffic report: Sweet dreams on Halloween
Threat
I find it strange that you should threaten me with a formal notice of banning when you are the one reverting. I on the other hand have followed all Wiki guidelines by providing refs and going to the talk page and explaining at length and in detail, in a constructive manner, the significance of my addition. Your brief, flippant and misspelt response is unacceptable and juvenile.This is not the first time you have been warned about edit warring. You have obviously not read what I wrote .To clarify: the original edit simply contained bald facts that were referenced. When challenged to explain these, I did. Then you said I was "pushing a line".I was just explaining the significance of the edit to anyone unfamilar with NZ history. The explanation or interpretation is not part of the edit!Very simple really. Claudia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.62.226.243 (talk) 01:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- Then you flow up with a demand for me to be civil!!This is rather arrogant. Do you have a problem with women who know what they are talking about? You are off topic -the edit in question has been approved by another, independent editor. I think you are well meaning Stuart, but somewhat out of your depth in editing NZ history. Your father was more knowledgeable than you. You will note my multiple, positive,accurate and very detailed additions to NZ history etc on wiki over many years. My contributions to wiki take long hours of research per edit.There is nobody else doing this. Your recent edits appear to be sudden and impulsive over reactions. My contributions to Nz history etc have resulted in far more balanced, factual accounts of our history -far more than any other editor. I have managed to get rid of most the hopelessly biased, seriously distorted and maybe politically motivated versions that used to inhabit wiki. Do you need to examine your own motives for your behaviour? It is important for a person in your position and age to be self aware(why do I behave like this? Why do I hold these views?) and avoid lashing out. Maybe you just need a break. Claudia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.62.226.243 (talk) 21:51, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
- I think we have to accept that "Claudia" is a troll, with an online personality spiced up by constant reminders that "I am a lady! That's what I am, a lady!" This editor plays a game of brinksmanship, provoking and taunting other editors while carrying out a deliberate campaign of misinformation and distortion in articles. Until he/she goes so far that banning is definitely warranted, I see no option but for editors to be vigilant and prompt in tagging or removing his/her most egregious edits and not wasting time on pointless debates. BlackCab (TALK) 23:15, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2014)
Sleeping is part of everyday life
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Pizza • National park Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:17, 10 November 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
Wikidata weekly summary #132
Tech News: 2014-46
15:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)