- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:50, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 21st Century Male (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable film by director whose article was recently deleted. Prod was removed without explanation. No evidence of significant coverage within the article and none found from a Google search. Michig (talk) 19:12, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - This documentary is only 8 minutes long, certainly not worthy of an article.BritishWatcher (talk) 19:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The size is irrelevant. If a (hypothetical) 8-minute documentary happens to be highly controversial, is written about extensively in the press and wins awards, it's notable -- despite its size. - Mgm|(talk) 20:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I give permission to anypne to restore this article once it has won an Oscar for 'best documentary', but until then, it will lie in the Wikipedia 'Recently Deleted' Pit. TopGearFreak Talk 20:07, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non-notable documentary. Schuym1 (talk) 00:18, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:45, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per nom. Toddst1 (talk) 02:01, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.