- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
2Build 4Ward International Organization
- 2Build 4Ward International Organization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found zero significant coverage for this organization. The only links in the article are unreliable - Blogspot, Facebook, and Twitter. Fails WP:ORG. SL93 (talk) 00:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 13:31, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I looked and agree with nom, nothing to show notability. As a year-old, apparently all-volunteer charity, this lack of evidence is to be expected. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 15:24, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I found two articles in the Sacremento Press: [1] and [2]. The first article is not independent as it written by a member of the organisation, and the second article is not significant coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 17:52, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.