- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. This could have been legitimately speedy-keeped, as no legitimate grounds for deletion was raised. As said, en-wiki uses English. Only 1 editor suggested a grammatical rename, so I've not implemented it as part of my close. Anyone is free to BRD as they wish (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 10:40, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bahasa Rojak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Rencana ini ditulis dalam bahasa Inggeris yang merupakan bahasa perantaraan utama dunia menyebabkan rencana ini dapat dicapai oleh ramai orang dari seluruh dunia.Perkara ini membimbangkan kerana rencana ini mendedahkan kelemahan dan menjatuhkan maruah bahasa dan bangsa Melayu serta negara Malaysia.Cukuplah hal ini setakat diketahui oleh orang dalam sahaja dan kita perlulah cuba menyelesaikan masalah ini. Hrs Hzr (talk) 10:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC) Creating deletion discussion for Bahasa Rojak
- Google translation Bahasa Malaysia to English of the above message by User:Hrs Hz - see below
"The plan is written in English which is the leading language of the world making it accessible to many people around the world. This is worrying because it exposes the weaknesses and degrades the Malay language and the nation and Malaysia. and we should try to solve this problem."
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment. @Hrs Hzr: This is English Wikipedia, thus please use English for any communication. Secondly for the same topic, there is an existing page in Malay Wikipedia page - see here and you can use Malaysia language there. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep.Wikipedia is not censored and the article is well-sourced with independent, reliable sources, thus pass WP:GNG. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- From a quick look around, this appears to be a well-documented subject. The nomination has no basis in Wikipedia:deletion policy. Uncle G (talk) 17:58, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep because the deletion rationale is invalid. Also, move to Bahasa rojak, as per Malay wikipedia ([1]), because it is not a proper noun. --Mkativerata (talk) 21:17, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.