- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:43, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Claudia Costa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability concerns - lacks the importance or significance of the subject. Fails any criteria of WP:PORNBIO. Cybergirls of the weeks are not equivalent to Playboy playmates. --Smilemeans (talk) 06:28, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 11:46, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 11:46, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I usually don't comment on these skin girl AfDs, but it says she was a playmate for the mexican edition of playboy. If there isn't a rule/essay already on whether that's sufficient, there should be, as that seems the primary claim of interest.--Milowent (talk) 20:40, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "Playboy Mexico, Playmate for Nov 2009" was added recently into article, but doesn't have its source. --Smilemeans (talk) 21:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I am sure if she indeed has that title, someone will tell us. Is that sufficient for notability? Just wondering, as I see these lesser-playboy AfDs a lot and wondered what the "rules" are.--Milowent (talk) 21:58, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:15, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep if we can get a picture put in the article somehow WildHorsesPulled (talk) 00:15, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The Mexican Playmate claim is unsupported with any source and isn't mentioned on her own MySpace page as far as I could find. And that seems to be the strongest claim to notability in the article. --RL0919 (talk) 21:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite 00:43, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.