- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:42, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dry Lake Watershed
- Dry Lake Watershed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per this. Hike796 (a supposedly banned user who hasn’t been unblocked, see the recent WP:SOCK entry for US40AL-01) recreated the deleted category in article space. Shannontalk contribs 21:48, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete on the basis that, as I understand it, a general discussion was held about the validity of articles on watersheds (as opposed to some other system of geological/geographical classiciation), and the watershed method was deprecated resulting in the deletion of watershed articles. Therefore this is a recreation of a page deleted in a previous deletion discussion and would be a candidate for speedy deletion. (I am wiling to change my vote if I've misunderstood the history.) - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:24, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Pfly in the discussion for Hot Creek-Railroad Watershed. Clearly this lacks notability as would be expected when you try and create articles for over 200,000 items listed in a database. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:50, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete on grounds on lack of notability. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 11:46 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.