- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kafziel Complaint Department 06:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Dukes of Haggard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable indy film, seemingly no distribution to speak of, no reliable sources, and only 54 unique Google hits, fouled by an eponymous San Diego-area bluegrass group. Fails WP:V, WP:N. Ravenswing 08:45, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The film makes no notability claims, and doesn't appear to stand up to notability criteria of WP:NOTFILM. Most of the films' web presence is on Youtube, which doesn't even appear to have any significant views. Not that this is a criteria for notability, but it does seem consistent with all the other issues. My vote is a deletion. Rasadam (talk) 08:52, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "Non-notable" is being rather kind to it--this barely escapes an A7 by the skin of its teeth to my mind.Blueboy96 18:15, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete who cares? Dreamspy (talk) 19:14, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:56, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.