- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 07:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- Embassy of Colombia, Beijing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:ORG. there is no bilateral article to redirect to. All the article confirms is its location plus a recycled paragraph that appears in every Colombian embassy article that the embassy represents Colombian interests etc. LibStar (talk) 13:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom, sources confirm existence but do not establish notability. Vrac (talk) 12:17, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NORG. There is some passing coverage but nothing that rises to the level of having an article. JbhTalk 22:59, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as I'm not seeing much better here. SwisterTwister talk 05:40, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.