- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Laverne Antrobus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails notability. PR page for non notable person, created and majorly contributed to by COI/SPA. Very little relevant info shows up in searches. Rayman60 (talk) 13:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Weak keep Has one published book (of little note) - the other publication is a pamphlet. Has appeared in an hour-long BBC show based on her work. So verging on notable, but barely there. LaMona (talk) 16:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 17:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 17:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for now at best and draft and userfy later if needed as my searches found nothing better than a few passing mentions (two articles from 2007 and 2010) at News, hardly much for a considerably better notable article. SwisterTwister talk 22:20, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.