- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Lent Bumps#Crews finishing Head of the River as an WP:ATD Salvio giuliano 07:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lent Bumps 2023 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence found of notability, source in article isn't independent. Only source in Google News is Varsity, which is a University newspaper. This year's activities don't seem to receive any attention from WP:RS outside the university. Perhaps older years need to be deleted as well if they have the same issues, this AfD though is only for the 2023 edition. Fram (talk) 14:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Sports, and United Kingdom. Fram (talk) 14:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as it does not meet WP:GNG, unless a suitable redirect target can be found.Onel5969 TT me 13:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 15:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to Lent Bumps#Crews finishing Head of the River, where the winners for this are listed. No evidence this passes WP:GNG, and the same is almost certainly true for many other years of this event. Redirect is a valid WP:ATD. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- keep - either delete the lot, or none. Deleting just one year makes no sense William M. Connolley (talk) 17:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Some of them might be notable, but this one isn't. And if you bundle too many together, it will always end up as a procedural keep per WP:TRAINWRECK. So nominating some separately like this is perfectly sensible, and WP:OSE isn't a valid keep reason. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:34, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment. It is quite weird to have Category:Lent Bumps results with all these detailed stats. Maybe we should consider merging it with some kinda summarizing. Suitskvarts (talk) 20:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete No indication that it meets WP:GNG. Perhaps the other years are not notable either, but that's not the issue here. Nigej (talk) 11:10, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per Nigej and one15969. I suspect many other examples of this aren't notable either, but we can deal with those in due time. RobinCarmody (talk) 14:19, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.