- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:39, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Michel Perrault (sociologist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Possible hoax; see talk page for more. NW (Talk) 17:09, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:HOAX Contribution from a single purpose account (SPA) [1] is reason to ask further questions which, in this case, the article cannot answer [2]. The occasional hoax is a small price to pay for the freedom of having an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Some might say that four months is proof that they "got away with it"; I'd say it's actually proof that the article was so uninteresting, nobody bothered to read it until now. Mandsford 17:56, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unverifiable. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:30, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, for the reasons I outlined on the talk page. EdwardTattsyrup (talk) 23:17, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:22, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as hoax. The composer Michel Perrault is the only author of this name found in WorldCat, the Bibliothèque nationale de France catalogue, Google Scholar or FRANCIS. I suspect that the supposed quotation is output from the Postmodernism Generator; for example, compare the first sentence of our quotation ("If one examines capitalist narrative, one is faced with a choice: either reject neosemiotic nihilism or conclude that narrative must come from the masses") with the first sentence of section 4 here. EALacey (talk) 03:31, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. I cannot find any references to confirm that such a sociologist indeed existed (would prefer input from a native French speaker about search results in French though). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 04:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:00, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unverifiable at best. Edward321 (talk) 13:12, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.