- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 15:02, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Paraná Banco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I nominated this article for deletion because:
- It's not in english
- Has no third-party sources Richevans69 (talk) 18:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Richevans69 (talk) 18:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete under WP:A2
- Procedural keep; the language issue is irrelevant, because an English-language article was overwritten with Portuguese in 2018, so I've reverted to the English article. Even if there weren't English content in the history, A2 also wouldn't apply, since it's meant for when an en:wp page is moved elsewhere (or, I suppose, a page elsewhere is wrongly moved here), and the Portuguese page here was different from the pt:wp page. The only potentially valid reason for deletion is on notability grounds, and on that I'm neutral. I say "procedural keep" because I don't want this discussion to be influenced by anything other than the notability issue. Nyttend (talk) 02:54, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment On the notability question there seems to be some results about them in Google News. Although I don't speak the language and therefore don't want to a decision on their reliability, but sources about the company do seem to exist. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:43, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:05, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.