- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Seddon talk 08:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Qualitest Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG, lacks reliable coverage Zackdasnicker (talk) 12:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Zackdasnicker (talk) 12:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete It may still be a large outsourcing company, but it is not notable failing both Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) and WP:GNG. Looking at my comment in the last RfC, it might be time to WP:SALT. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:38, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. I haven't yet examined if Qualitest Group meets WP:NCORP so just commenting for now. Qualitest is owned by the Bridgepoint Group so if found to be NN, it should be merged, not deleted. gidonb (talk) 02:02, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Most sources are press release or non reliable. An apparently reliable source is just a passing mention [1]. MarioGom (talk) 18:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.