- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Social IQ score of bacteria
- Social IQ score of bacteria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The page appears to just restate what's in a single scientist's paper. All other references are tangential to the page topic. Searching on GScholar shows this term doesn't seem to have been adopted outside the Ben-Jacob lab. Topic is mentioned in some press releases from scientist's home university, but doesn't meet WP:GNG (not covered in independent sources). Ajpolino (talk) 04:10, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Ajpolino (talk) 04:11, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Ajpolino (talk) 04:11, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
- Merge to Eshel Ben-Jacob#Bacterial decision-making. Some good material but not enough secondary coverage for a standalone article. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:57, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Not even mergable, just an individual's attempt to put a cute spin. The cuteness is obvious fdrom the contsnts of the article, which talk about bacteria as if they were conscious and make comparisons with humans. DGG ( talk ) 22:21, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.