- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn. SL93 (talk) 20:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Talk to Me (2005 film)
- Talk to Me (2005 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found nothing that shows notability for this film. The only source in the article is the official website. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 16:56, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable film.Lugnuts (talk) 09:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]- Keep per improvements. The film is sourcable as having aired on Channel 4, [1][2] and I quickly found coverage in The Guardian, [3] and weaker ones in Paste Magazine, [4], NPR,[5] and a few others. Nice that years after its original screening, the film still receives some coverage as I did not expect continued coverage for this 2005 documentary short. Article now being improved through regular editing... so far turning the nominated stub into THIS. Is this the most notable documentary ever? Nope. Does it meet WP:NF through sourcable coverage and review? I think yes... just. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Change to Keep following the excellent work done by Michael. Lugnuts (talk) 07:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.